Communism And Vegetarianism In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Improved Essays
Communism is known to be a political theory that advocates class war and leads to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. Communism if often seen bad by Americans because that is what the bourgeoisie teach us proletarians to believe. The bourgeoisie are people of a higher class than the proletarians that own the means of production and hire employees of wage laborers. Proletarians are the middle class people who must sell their labor to the bourgeoisie in order to survive and most Americans are of the proletarians. Anyways, the bourgeoisie want us proletarians to believe communism is bad because communism wants to destroy them and of course they don’t want that. In the writing, “The Communist Manifesto” the author Karl Marx explains how communism is a good thing by how it aims to destroy the bourgeoisie and their private property which leads to the proletarians gaining power and making the profits they deserve. …show more content…
However, they do tend to rip off their employees by either paying them low wages or by continuously building on new factories and machinery taking away their jobs. For example Marx says, “Meantime the markets kept ever growing, the demand ever rising. Even manufacturer no longer sufficed. Thereupon, steam and machinery revolutionized industrial production”(339). Marx is explaining how the bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing instruments of production like machinery. However, the proletariats cannot survive without work and these machines take away thousands of jobs. Therefore, the bourgeoisie are bad because their productions are taking away jobs that the proletariats can't

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” is about communism, which is when the proletarians overthrow the bourgeois by starting a revolution. The main goal of a communist is to demolish the hierarchical society and establish…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Marx, the bourgeoisie class controlled the manufacturing system and established “new conditions of oppression” to control the proletariat (Marx, 159-160). Therefore, a class struggle existed and it was worsening for the proletariat class as the bourgeoisie were “constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society” (Marx, 161). However, for Marx, the exploitation of the proletariat for capital will not continue as the bourgeoisie are digging their own graves by continuing to oppress the working class (Marx, 169). Also, in contrast to Nietzsche who says that the slaves are weak and hopeless, Marx does not consider the proletariat as inherently weak. In fact, Marx is clear in stating that the “fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable” especially with the increase in the proletariat’s revolutionary consciousness (Marx, 169).…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Karl Marx was a German economist, historian, and sociologist. Marx got into trouble with the government when he criticized a new law that prevented peasants from gathering dead wood in the forest in an editorial he wrote. This was the start of his views, which were so radical and revolutionary that he had to leave Germany. His most comprehensive work was Das Kapital, translating to Capital in English it was published in three volumes and was completed by Engels after Marx died in 1883. In the Capital, he explained why capitalism, as an economic theory was so morally wrong that it would eventually destroy itself.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx, a philosopher, economist was again the ideas of Industrialization. One of Marx argument is the increases in wealth gap between the rich and the poor. While the owner of factory run businesses and make money, the workers are still providing labor in the businesses. One is getting richer, other is still stay poor. On the other hand, there is also guilds that are suffering due to deceases demands for their skill.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto was a piece of writing that Karl Marx and Frederich Engles created. The influence that The Communist Manifesto had was huge. It describes the two types of societal classes the, Bourgeoisie’s and the Proletariat’s. Not only that, but The Communist Manifesto describes what both of those classes consist of and the roles each played. It went on to tell the effects the Bourgeoisie’s have on the Proletariat’s, and how a communist society is created.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Marx assert that implementing these laws would not directly combat the root of the problem in the first place. While Mill might have argued that lack of government oversight over the safety of the workers caused the factory collapse, Marx would argue that class distinctions in bourgeois society leads to the conditions that caused the factory to collapse; the factory owners valuing their workers solely by the value of their labor. In “the Communist Manifesto” Marx states that “modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few,” (Marx 170). Marx asserts that the bourgeois system of private property elevates the bourgeoise owners of private property and production, over the proletariat who produce for the bourgeoise. In their pursuit of private property, the bourgeoise devalue the work of the proletariat and begin to exploit their labor for gain.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto was considered one of influential documents during the 1840's and still today. The Communist Manifesto was a pamphlet that originally had twenty-three pages, but it was so inspiring to many people. This Manifesto was written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The pamphlet discusses subjects that were not unheard of nor new, but Marx and Engels were the first to write a powerful paper copy of all the ideas of the past and hopes for the future. The Communist Manifesto was represented many times throughout Animal Farm, especially through Old Major's dream.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Communism Vietnam Dbq

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Communism is one word that the Americans never wanted to hear. Communism is a society where land and the means of production are collectively owned. Communism is a place where not one person had ownership of their things, everything was shared. The Americans believed in the domino theory and, if the United States of America did not stop the spread of communism, every country that bordered a communist country, would eventually become a communist county. This is one reason why the United States sent thousands of military advisors to Vietnam in 1964.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto is the collection of ideas shared by Marx and Engels, detailing social and political life during the nineteenth century. Their book also alluded to how the dismemberment of capitalism would lead to the penultimate reign of a socialist society, which would then transform into communism. Communism would be the last leg of the journey, from which the life of…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An easy way of looking at it, communism is a more extreme form, of socialism. As socialism involves those in the community giving up some of their wealth to be distributed to level out the social class, while communism requires that everyone give up their individual property and everyone receive the same as everyone else to satisfy their needs. Another key difference between the two involves the projected fall of capitalism. According to the Communist Manifesto, Marx believed that the fall of capitalism would occur by a revolution from the middle-class (or bourgeoisie) after the exploitation they faced at the hands of the upper-class. Rather than believing in this violent demise of capitalism, socialist (as previously discussed) believe more in trying to narrowing the gap built between to social classes, instead of terminating them…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Communist Manifesto was a report that made legitimate the entire speculation behind the lifestyle of communism and also the goals that these sorts of overseeing propose to accomplish as time goes on. The affirmation faced off regarding the conclusion between the various classes of society that incite the uprising improvement of the business and production of stock of the economy. Before long associations between the classes wound up noticeably nonexistent; it was by then another class ascend and assumed control. This proclamation has its individual explanation. Among them was the disagreement that free endeavor was flimsy and can't get a handle on these progressions.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The bourgeois forced the proletariat to sell their labor on the market, in order to make ends meet, where they often faced rather dour working conditions. The events of the Industrial Revolution can be characterized by its very name, a revolution of the industrial. Workshops were replaced by factories, and mass amounts of relatively low workers were required to run these factories where the general quality of work had decreased substantially. The bourgeois manipulated the proletariat who would produce twelve hours’ worth of value in eight hour of work with eight hours’ worth of pay. The excess went straight to the bourgeois and helped them to further cement their concentrations of economic and political…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Argument Research Essay My topic for this paper is communism. My opinion on this topic is that although the idea of communism appears good as a theory, if it were to be put into practice, to run a society, or promote the system to other countries, it would not be as effective as it appears in theory. The reality of communism would show actual flaws, that would not keep up the system ideals. What is communism?…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The one thing that doesn 't abide by majority rule is a person 's conscience.” (Lee, 1960), Social movements are a large part of how our society shifts to new norms. Social movements are causing a cultural change in our society based on a social ill that has been deemed necessary to be fixed. The types of social movements can go from one end of the spectrum to another, One could have riots and violence, and the other could have speeches and a passive nature. They are all capable of being able to go through the four stages of a social movement, emergence, coalescence, bureaucratization, and decline.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays