Importance Of Centralized Government

Improved Essays
Dejah Small
Introduction to Government and Politics 1327 9:00AM
December 5th, 2016
Paper Option 2
Centralized Governments and The U.S. Constitution Throughout the course of history, there has been controversy over the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. Both documents having had its issues of not having a strong enough foundation or violating the idea of a stronger national/ centralized government. First off, a central government has the authority to control an entire nation, and is sometimes referred to as a national government. The importance of a central government is so that they can have control over the states, and so that there is enough power to enforce laws among the states. A central government shows more efficiency
…show more content…
Acemoglu and Robinson believed economic success developed from the government became accountable for the citizens, which is due to a central government. I feel as though these two authors take on the position of federalists under the Constitution. They saw that the states having control wasn’t the best option, especially when it came to benefiting the people. Both authors would understand that a decentralized government was causing failure to the nation. I believe they would agree with Madison and Washington very much especially on the points that the Articles of Confederation was a complete failure and that we needed a new system to follow. Both authors understand that the national government and states share sovereignty, since the Anti-federalists create this idea that the states are just run by the federal government without a say in anything that is happening. I feel as though the importance behind this is that when things get chaotic and the states try to go off and do their own thing, the federal government would take …show more content…
Although many opposed what this document stood for, I feel as though without it the nation would have been caught in a web of destruction, debt, and chaos. The Constitution saved the United States from the failure it was heading towards. With the help of Washington and Madison, as well as federalists, the federal government took control over the states, being that they had an excessive amount of power. I completely agree with Washington when he says, the states were only united by a rope of sand, because that is a perfect representation of how things were, before the creation of the United States. Being that the federal government had limited power of the states, it was only a matter of time, before that rope of sand holding the nation together fell apart and created more problems for the government to deal with. Without centralized government, it would have been like a teacher trying to run a class where there are rules, but the students could choose whether they listened, and that is exactly a point of Acemoglu and Robinson’s theory of why nations fall apart. Without centralization/ national government and Constitution to replace the articles of confederation, our nation would have fallen

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This branch does not work to cooperate with the other branches to take over the United States and gain complete control of everyone inside the country. The anti federalists see the federal government as one that agree with each other and that will simply pass any law that they wish in order to make them richer and stronger, but in reality only truly necessary laws would be allowed to pass. They forget what happened back in the late 1700s when states and their governments power were greatly uneven. The states that could offer more economically would inevitably have more power leaving other states weak. The federal government helped fix this problem by creating a Union that helped every state.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Checks and Balances is a system used by the U.S government to limit the power of each branch so that every branch is equal in power and no branch has too much power. This Checks and Balances system is important to our government because if not, one branch would take over the others and there would be no control or equality with the power our government has and is given by the people. The colonists past experiences with British rule led to the fear of creating a strong central government. Because of this fear the Articles of Confederation seemed like an amazing constitution for the U.S. It established a weak national (federal) government and strong state governments.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our founders distrusted direct democracy, and prefered a representative form of government because direct democracy gives too much power to the majority; ensuring that the general will, will always prevail. Even The Articles of confederation, a form of government that favored general will over the federal government so much so the federal government had so little power, it couldn't even get the states to pay their war debts, was not a direct democracy. England was a representative government as well, but they represented the people by social class; our founders did not agree that this was a fair and just way of governing. SImilar to England to vote in america one had to qualify; you had to be a white male who owned land. Unlike england; land was fairly easy to acquire in America, so around seventy percent of the white population could vote.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jefferson wanted states to be independent within themselves, but united when dealing with foreign affairs. The federal government was only for dealing with foreign concerns. On the contrary, not only did Hamilton want to model the American economy after England’s, but he wanted to shape the government after them as well. Hamilton believed state power will be the enemy of the federal government. State governments will make it too difficult to maintain the national government, they are bias, and Americans should have a firm union in this new nation.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are states worth our time? Could the United States function as efficiently if states were dissolved? Ultimately, states are necessary for our federal government to function. Since the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, Founders believed in a division between governments to ensure no single entity would gain power. While a division between levels of government is needed to secure the rights of citizens, history has indicated a struggle for power between national and state institutions.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Articles of Confederation attempted to provide structure, and governance to the newly emancipated states. After ratification, numerous problems arose from the setup of the government. This prompted for a revision of the Articles of Confederation. Two groups emerged around the debate for a new constitution. The two groups are the federalist who supported a strong central government, and the anti-federalist who did not.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Conservatism

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over the past centuries the American people evolve their own ideas and have expanded their views on the government from holding them back. Which makes you think that Conservatism is incompatible with democracy. Conservatism is founded on deception because of its prejudice and inequality, which makes it to be a destructive system to the Untied States. I think the solution to get past the idea is that the government needs to stop whining with one another and figure out how to make the Unites States a stronger country. I like the idea of John Stuart Mill (1899) that the power of the government should only be used is if there is harm coming to an individual.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Examples Of Free Republics

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The result of such a government would be a completely changed society where people are honest and virtuous. In the Constitution I see a government driven by ambitions, but in my mind I have small-scaled governments envisioned. In small-scaled governments, citizens would be free to live their own lives. The other kind of government as laid out in the Constitution would entail taxes, drafts, offices, and wars that would damage human dignity and thus, be fatal to self-government. Large power governments are not to be trusted.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism is the One and Only History abounds with tales of destructive dictatorships and the failed democracies. Which is better: governments with casualties or casual governments? Absolutism is a more expedient form of government because it is quick and painless; it provides the guidance and boundaries to keep countries and citizens out of turmoil; democracy is slow, messy, and ineffective. In the United States of America, a representative democracy, Congress takes long to do little. The Washington Informer proves this through their article “Democratic, GOP Squabbling Leads to Government Shutdown” written by journalist Barrington Salmon.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To follow up my point, “ according to Fallon” the orbital cortex puts a brake on another part of the brain called the amygdala, which is involved with aggression and appetites.” (NPR, 2010). Also, I cannot agree with Hobbes on the issue of the government/sovereign being superior over the people in the social contract. I agree that Locke is right that the sovereign or government is subordinate to the people, especially in a democracy as theoretically the people make up the government so if the people are upset, it is most likely that the system has been corrupted, thus justifying a revolution using Locke’s theory, but not Hobbs. Obviously, the right to revolution is something that I agree in if the governmental system set up in place becomes corrupted. The only way that Hobbs would justify a revolution is if the sovereign/government ceases to function properly, not if the people are just unpleased with the system.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays