Importance Of Barriers To Critical Thinking

Improved Essays
Barriers to Critical Thinking

Do you ever contemplate why it is numerous individuals (possibly even yourself) often tend to deviate from employing efficacious critical thinking skills? The answer to this inquiry is quite simplistic in nature. There are, in fact, innumerable sources of deterrents that merely serve to impede one’s ability to think critically, which consist of two, boundless categories. Elaborating, the two categories of critical thinking hindrances include Internal Barriers and External Barriers. While there 's a multitude of “shaping agents” (Ridel, 2015), that thwarts thinking perspicaciously, it’s imperative to ascertain the capability
…show more content…
26) explains the origination of barriers as follows:

"Your ability to think critically, like the formation of opinions, attitudes, values and goals, is influenced by your social environment and the collective actions of shaping agents that define it. Some configurations promote you to develop your critical thinking skills - while other arrangements thwart your ability to become a critical thinker."

Simply stated, we aren’t born with the impediments that foil our critical thinking skills, as they are learned, instead! (They’re not biological they’re sociological - brought on by our social environment). Moreover, these negative influences are broken down into two types of barriers, which include internal and external sources.

Defining Internal Barriers

Now, you have a greater cognizance of what binds people from being proficient critical thinkers. However, what exactly, are internal barriers? "“Internal” will refer to barriers that originate from within you," (Ridel, 2015, p. 27). These obstacles that stem from inside ourselves, require that we learn to decipher what falls under this category, followed by modification of said barriers in which you particularly struggle with. The most significant and problematic characteristics which are in correlation with internal barriers are as follows (Ridel, 2015, pp.
…show more content…
I seem to become extremely stubborn once in a while. If I believe I am right about something, regardless if I am in fact, correct or even if I am wrong, I get stubborn and stand by my claim. I act as if that is the final say in the matter and demonstrate no interest whatsoever, in hearing the opposing side. As also suggested by Ridel (2015, p. 66), possible solutions for overcoming stubbornness are listed below:

• Realize that factual evidence is what truly matters, therefore, focus on objectivity;
• Avoid standing by stubborn claims, even more so when presented with factual evidence that proves otherwise;
• Be certain not to ever invent false data just to support my claim. Let’s move on and discuss external barriers.

External Barriers Explained

External barriers, unlike internal, require replacement as opposed to modification. What’s considered as an external barrier? They are as follows (Ridel, 2015, p. 27):

• Family
• Friends
• Teachers
• Media

When it comes to the matter of overcoming external barriers, we require replacing what is blocking us from thinking critically, with what will encourage critical thinking. Summary of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Why we get triggered and what helps. The trust triggers, the feedback is wrong, unfair, and unhelpful. They feel that before we figure out what to do with the feedback, we must first understand it. We have to get a sense of where the givers are coming from. Then we have to shift from the wrong to tell me more.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If it were merely subjective knowledge that we employed there would always be a revolving circle of conflict about what decisions were just. Evaluation of argument: It is my view that if we rely on subjective position only it would not hold up that it can’t be deployed in support of itself. Merely asking the question if one can be objective or not suggest that they can. Who would even care in searching for the truth if someone could be objective if it has not occurred at some point before? Otherwise, we are all just blabbering idiots, going on and on about our own experiences and agendas.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This stage is known as functional analysis; it is crucial for learning how thoughts, feelings, and situations can present maladaptive behaviors. This procedure can be difficult, especially for patients who struggle with self-analysis, but it can eventually lead to self-discovery and awareness that are important part of the treatment…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glenn explains the stress and limitations involved with multitasking in the article. He speaks about the different parts of the brain used when we multitask. It is interesting to understand the systems we use to derive a priority system that establishes how people determine what actions come before others while we execute many tasks at one time. We try to stay objective while we are doing several things at a time. The article shows it is not always beneficial due to parts of the task being lost while we are distracted.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Misconceptions Essay

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I am very stubborn. Yet, when people’s only argument against my opinion is that I only feel this way out of stubborn I cannot help but, be peeved. That is not a valid argument against me. I am allowed to not want to do things and not like things for reasons outside of being stubborn and people need to realize that. I am stubborn but, that is not all that I…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opening myself to feelings and the feelings of others requires ongoing practice. To use the knowledge acquired during this course one needs to identify and understand the barriers to effective communication. These barriers maybe physical, and or psychological obstacles that interfere with the planning, organization, transmission and understanding of a message. In my case I have identified my obstacles as been impatience, not listening and most importantly not been able to express myself in an effective way. I have come to learn that the natural result of such obstacles or interfering factors leads to the misunderstanding of messages.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The society’s perceptions about a phenomenon are not a stable pre-existing internal state but vary depending on the purpose, circumstance and context of the discourse. It can accordingly be argued that the truth about a given phenomenon is not assumed by individual participants in a social discourse, but perceived through the lenses of their specific society or context. This is because participants in a social interaction are both producers and products of culture within their social environment. In other words, to make sense of what people say, we need to take into account the social context within which they speak (Willig,…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are heuristic methods that are systematic cognitive biases that limit our intellect and often trap the decision-maker by making decisions based on preconceived notions when a more complex way of reasoning is needed. Because these biases are hardwired into our thinking process it 's important for decision-makers to have the ability to recognize the potential misuse of them. It is important for leaders to recognize that they have these preconceived biases that may influence the way they make decisions. It may be impossible to completely remove the influence of these biases, but they can be reduced by realizing they exist and being open…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When reviewing this dilemma with the current knowledge, multiple aspects would be altered to handle the situation differently. Firstly, stronger skills in relation to critical thinking and rationalization are needed. Pollock (2015) states that critical thinking allows someone to separate facts from concepts. This is crucial to have, as well as a firm structure in place to reference when ethical dilemmas arise. These structures guide individuals through complicated decisions, when all normal reasoning is lost, to determine what course of action needs to take place.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My threats are my verbal delivery, faulty decision making, and risk of losing relationships. The delivery of a message is vital in reference to communicating with others. My aggressive tone can be unfavorable and result in receiving subtle feedback and engagement from individuals in the work place. My results in the Myer-Briggs exercise reflects this trait. On the S/N scale, which indicates the type of data I prefer states that I focus on facts and usually individuals with this trait tend to be pragmatic, concrete and inductive.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics