The assessment chosen to be analyze is the formal assessment 3.1 and 3.2. Assessment 3.1 given at the end of the learning segment. Assessment 3.1 consist of six matching items and four true and false questions. The matching is to assess the students’ comprehension of the difference between the text features and their purpose in the text. Assessment 3.2 consists of four written response questions the questions are to assesses the students ability to use the literacy strategy to effectively locate information to answer questions on a given topic.thi9s has been the central focus of the learning segments. The learning targets being evaluated are from lessons one through three. Learning target one “I can match a different text features with their
…show more content…
The set evaluation criteria involved students correctly matching six text features with the purpose/definition, and identify which statement provided regarding nonfiction text features were true or false which is is directly related to the learning target one .The Students were also assessed on their ability to effectively use the essential literacy strategies related to the learning targets two and three. In order to mete the evaluation criteria for the written response section of the assessment the students had to search the specific text name then locate text features that will provide them information needed to answer specific questions being asked on a topic. Students had to write the name of the text feature and the page number where they located the text feature. Students had to also answer each questions using complete sentences, if the students did not answer all parts of the questions they would lose …show more content…
The data showed the following results based on the set evaluation criteria. Three out of the four students in the group had met all the evaluation criteria thus showing they had mastered the essential literacy strategy and met all the learning target for the assessments. One out of the four students assessment showed she had met most of the evaluation criteria and had comprehend the use of the essential literacy strategy, although the student made errors on the assessment it was not directly related to the use of the essential literacy strategy, but with other factors such as following the directions on the assessments which did not allowed her to meet all the criteria set for each section of the assessment. There was one student out of the four students in the group whom had difficulty meeting the evaluation criteria. This student work sample showed he had the most difficulty with the written response section of the assessment. The student did not complete questions three and four of the assessment. Although the student did not meet all the evaluation criteria for the written response question, matching, and true and false section. He did correctly matched 4 out of the 6 features with their purposes and identified 3 out of the 4 statements which were true or false about nonfiction text features. I don’t believe the
The set evaluation criteria involved students correctly matching six text features with the purpose/definition, and identify which statement provided regarding nonfiction text features were true or false which is is directly related to the learning target one .The Students were also assessed on their ability to effectively use the essential literacy strategies related to the learning targets two and three. In order to mete the evaluation criteria for the written response section of the assessment the students had to search the specific text name then locate text features that will provide them information needed to answer specific questions being asked on a topic. Students had to write the name of the text feature and the page number where they located the text feature. Students had to also answer each questions using complete sentences, if the students did not answer all parts of the questions they would lose …show more content…
The data showed the following results based on the set evaluation criteria. Three out of the four students in the group had met all the evaluation criteria thus showing they had mastered the essential literacy strategy and met all the learning target for the assessments. One out of the four students assessment showed she had met most of the evaluation criteria and had comprehend the use of the essential literacy strategy, although the student made errors on the assessment it was not directly related to the use of the essential literacy strategy, but with other factors such as following the directions on the assessments which did not allowed her to meet all the criteria set for each section of the assessment. There was one student out of the four students in the group whom had difficulty meeting the evaluation criteria. This student work sample showed he had the most difficulty with the written response section of the assessment. The student did not complete questions three and four of the assessment. Although the student did not meet all the evaluation criteria for the written response question, matching, and true and false section. He did correctly matched 4 out of the 6 features with their purposes and identified 3 out of the 4 statements which were true or false about nonfiction text features. I don’t believe the