First, they are mainly accountable for supervising officers from the rank structure, second they are also accountable to the courts for their way of exercising the power in cases that result in prosecution, and they might be the subject to criminal or civil court accounts (Zander, 2013). Lastly, they are answerable to the society for investigating and recording complaints that are made against police from community members. Most significantly as a part of legislation, individual police officers holding account is the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). The Act creates a method from which any individual public who were wounded from any phase of communication with police officer may have that communication interrogated and examined and independently analysed and guarantees the neutrality and transparency of the method from exterior observing of by from PCA (Zander, 2013).
There are three major areas of accountability in order to consider within most policing firms that includes Financial, Personal and Operational. All of which at certain level are the duty and responsibility of the Chief Officer of Police. If there contains certain level of police independence, then providing the hierarchic police firm’s nature, this translates within a great contract of personal independence for Chief Officer in governance of the cooperation, and consequently the personal responsibility for any supposed …show more content…
It is true that Police services have great capital funds to direct. What mainly cause issues is trying hard to fit policing results in sort of loss balance sheet and profit that accountants are familiarised. For instance, the ideologies of effective management of all these are possibly not immensely diverse from the philosophies of any industry that may lead to depend on receiving the greatest worth for money from its factories, vehicles, shops and