Are Abrahamic Religions Compatible

Great Essays
Abrahamic Religions and it’s Compatibility with Liberal Democracy The topic of religion and democracy’s compatibility is an especially complex one. The academic debates and the current literature express different opinions regarding religion and democratic values and if they are compatible or not. What is meant by compatibility is, if the core values of them both are contradictory or not. This essay will argue that the Abrahamic religions and it’s values are incompatible with liberal democratic values. There are three main reasons why they are incompatible. First being that religion is static, meaning it’s core values do not change over time, whereas a democracy is always changing according to the people’s demands and needs. Second, …show more content…
One of religion’s objectives is to explain the unknown and to establish social order by claiming that one should have faith. If one is to doubt, instead of having faith, it is considered a sin. Liberal democracy needs public policies to govern, which are based on science. Public policy is needed for an effective democracy, as it groups human issues and problems and finds a way to solve them using logic that is scientifically based and has sufficient evidence. With Abrahamic religions, because faith is used in most circumstances, if democracy was to be based on faith the probability of creating effective policies and laws will be low. For example, if there happened to be an epidemic, religion may implement a policy based on faith and praying rather than policies that are based on science, medication, and research. Some religious branches of christianity such as Jehovah’s witness do not believe in taking another person’s blood even in emergencies, which has led to deaths. This simply proves that faith, which is a key component of religion is not compatible with the policies that democracy may implement because it is what the people of a nation require. It is not say that religious individuals cannot live with these policies but, it undermines some of their religious …show more content…
Eventually if religions keep “progressing” or changing their core values to accommodate democratic needs the traditional and original religion’s survival becomes threatened. The reason for the threat of survival that has been taking place is because “core Christian doctrines of sin, repentance, and election were reduced to a “theological populism” (Heclo, 2009) . This is the reason why democracy and religion are not compatible, because of the strong impact it has on religion departing from the orthodox practices and traditions. The church especially, is leaving the traditions of moral teaching to accommodate liberal movements. Hence, the authenticity of religions has been loss and democracy and the need for policies that came with it is responsible for that. For example, if Christian pastors wanted an accommodation of not going against their religious beliefs to marry a gay couple, “religious accommodation claims of this kind may continue democratic conflict in new forms” ( Nejaime & Siegel, 2015) Or for instance, if 51% of a democracy votes that all rapists should be killed the only way the religion is going to be compatible with that new policy is if they undermine, or disregard what is said in their own books or set of laws about not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Charles Colson’s God and Government: An insider’s View On The Boundaries Between Faith & Politics breaks down the conflicts between two kingdoms: God’s and our government. Fear of another crusades would happen and the possibility of an overpowering religious government could arise (Colson 47). Colson believes that the christian foundation and morals is what the American government should take after. He says that in some views of the non-believers they agree with values of some religious faiths, “Today, many thinkers, even those who reject orthodox faith, agree that a religious-value consensus is essential for justice and concord” (Colson 52). He goes on saying how we need, “civil structure” because not only religion can fulfil order and “Both…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those against vaccines take pieces of scripture and warp them in a way that makes it appear as though vaccination is against religion. Doing so, however, reveals a personal belief and does not adhere to what is being taught in these scriptures (A Review of Religion). This means that realistically, the number of people being granted religious exemption should drastically…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Awakening Essay

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Religious uniformity takes away our religious freedoms and impedes on our civil liberties. We would be forced to believe in one God and be judged for not following the teachings of God. We would be forced to follow one faith, in a country that is made up of so many different cultures and religions. Established churches and tax-supported ministers would force us to pay another tax for a service that goes against our belief system making them a super power. By not challenging the authority of ministers, they would be given authority to enforce the teachings of God and strip us from our natural rights.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the United States has progressed into the 21st century, more and more people have started to turn away completely from Jesus, proving difficult for recent leaders to incorporate Jesus into their political views. President Barack Obama has been criticized by the religious right and their argument of political issues. "I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons," he said, "but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God 's will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all” (“God in the White House”). President Obama is proof that not all Christians have to be caucasian, evangelical…

    • 1016 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Religion Vs. Science

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Humans have spiritual needs that can be dealt by religion but not by science. In summary, religion isn 't good at dealing with scientific issues just as science isn 't good at dealing with religious issues. Conflicts between religion and science arise when people try to use religion to deal with issues best handled by science and when scientists try to use science to deal with issues best handled by religion. This conflict could be easily be avoided by personal choice if oneself refuses to…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, Liberalism is based upon respecting past, but refusing to be under its dominion. A liberal ponders, investigates, and rejects sacred beliefs and writings if they do not commend to his intelligence or moral values. Therefore, liberals claim that even the most Christians writing, including Scriptures must be refuted and dismantled if they do not agree with a human mind. Conversely, Machen states that Christianity is founded upon Scriptures, implying that the Scriptures are the most sacred presentation of God and their validity must not be questioned or changed by the human reason. Hence, Liberalism is totally different than Christianity as it is based on emotions and perceptions as…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we think of morality, many questions, such as “what is considered right ?”, and “what is considered wrong?”, come to mind. While many people believe that religion can help us answer these questions, others argue that morality is self- determining and should not relate to religion in any way. When morality and religion are put together, it causes conflicts because one person 's’ morals are not the same as another individuals. One person’s morals can be based off of one religion while others’ morals come from a separate religion, or in some cases, no religion at all. Thus, causing conflict because of all the different opinions on what is considered right and what is considered wrong.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rorty explains all of this in his book Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality. Alternatively, in Perry’s book The Idea of Human Rights, he argues that human rights must involve religion to be intelligible. Rorty definitely has some valid ideas on the topic of human rights, but they seem to be good in theory and not necessarily in reality. Rorty identifies the biggest problem in our world to be that people do not respect human rights. The reasons for that being that people tend to identify others as not fully human, even subhuman, through tribalism, racism, and sexism.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I do not think these two topics go hand in hand or are related in any way. Of the three ideas I have discussed, I can agree most with Immanuel Kant’s independence thesis and how religion and morality are independent from one another. I believe there is a God, but I am not extremely religious, yet I am still capable of making morally good decisions. I also liked Kant’s idea of immorality, how we are not perfect so immorality is expecting from everyone at some point. I think that for some people religion is a huge part of their actions, whether they be good or bad, but personally religion and morality do not…

    • 1113 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Some doctors automatically object for religious reasons” (Humphry 174). Even though some religions do object, there is no reason to restrict everyone else’s access to this humane treatment option. The religious groups would not have to participate if physician assisted suicide became legal in all fifty states. “Lord Carey previously opposed assisted suicide but stated his reversal was not ‘anti-Christian’, reasoning that ‘in strictly observing the sanctity of life, the Church could now actually be promoting anguish and pain, the very opposite of a Christian message of hope’” (“Assisted Suicide Split”). Lord Carey went against the beliefs of the Church and changed his opinion about physician assisted suicide.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays