Essay On Jury Of Peers

Great Essays
A jury is an important part of the American Courts System. Having a jury of peers is important because having multiple people decide consecutively on a case makes the ruling more legitimate and free of any biases. As a juror, it is important that you understand that you will only be deciding on the facts of the case, not the law. The judge will decide on what the law is and you simply must apply it to the facts of the case. You will not know the facts of the case until you get there. If you have seen synopsis’s of the case on television or in the news, you are not automatically disqualified from being a juror. Only if you have formed a pre-convinced opinion of the case—about who is responsible— and know that you have already solved the …show more content…
Then there is the defendant, the one who is being accused of the crime or the plaintiff has taken to court to receive compensation for some wrong done to them personally. The trial will be continuos and will not stop once it starts. Otherwise, important details could be forgotten. And besides, it can be in-convent for a trial to be drawn out for you, the other jurors, and of course everyone else involved. It also makes it more exciting in a way. It is called a “clash” and must be kept heightened. This will make the trail go by faster and is designed for the jury to be kept interested and attentive to the trail. The adversary system that Americans court system is based on is one where both parties present their cases and through the arguments the truth is found. There is a legal rule called “equality of forensic arms” that means must side have equal opportunities to present their case. So throughout the entire trail each party will alternate with doing the same actions. You will be listening to a Federal Civil Case, or a Criminal Case. However, it is most likely that it is a criminal case, considering juries in civil cases must be requested and is only in the Federal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Judge then handed the floor to the plaintiff attorney Richard Whitley introduced himself and his client which was named Michelle Moore. The defendant name was Joshua Muniz. He stated that the case was a motor vehicle accident and had already been trialed at a criminal court, which Defendant Muniz had plead guilty and was on probation and has severed community service for committing the crime. Moore was now suing for Punitive damages and mental anguish for damages that were occurred during the accident.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As criminology majors, we must learn the inner workings of the court system as well as the crucial courtroom players. We have all watched series such as Law and Order, CSI, American Crime, etc., but they give us a false sense of what an actual courtroom setup looks like. Unlike these shows, there are various steps that must be taken before the defendant is prosecuted. There is the arrest, initial appearance, bail is set, either a grand jury or preliminary hearing is conducted, arraignment occurs, along with all pre-trial motions being heard before trial, a trial is then started, a sentence is given, and sometimes the defendant appeals the charge. In contrast, assembly line justice cases end at the arraignment phase since the defendant accepts a plea deal.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Terry Edwards Trial

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Abhilash Gogineni Tinoco English 1A 3 March 2017 What Determines if You are Guilty or Not? Currently around the world, there have been many topics circulating about race, such as the Black Lives Matter movement. This movement promotes minority justice by trying to reduce the number of police brutalities in society.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bench Trial Dbq

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, a typical person generally has a lot of sympathy for other individuals. If they feel sorrowful for the defendant they are likely to give them the benefit of the doubt. In a bench trial, a professional judge with years of experience has no sympathy for an ordinary citizen no matter the circumstances. The jurors are human and haven’t trained as near as much as a trained judge. If a person chooses the jury trial…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How the jurors go about deliberating is never really brought into the attention to the court or to the public in general which makes it easier for other people to think the portrayal is correct. However, they make it seems if the jurors are stuffed in a hot little room and fight emotionally against each other’s opinions. In one scene, the 8th juror even pulls out a similar weapon that was used during the murder scene that he bought near the scene of the accident, which is not a legally possible. Ultimately this information can be misinterpreted with films because it isn’t information that the public is usually well aware about what is the formal way to decide on is the decision of the…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main concept of a voir dire is to determine whether a jury can be “fair, impartial arbiters of fact”. Potential jurors usually are selected from voter registration records for what is commonly referred to as jury duty. In the U.S., they must be from the same jurisdiction as the defendant. After a pool of potential jurors is selected, attorneys for both sides either suggest questions for the judge to ask, or they ask questions themselves of the jurors. The attorneys for both sides have a limited amount of “peremptory challenges,” with which they can bypass the judge and dismiss possible jurors for any reason.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is cases that are presented that are not necessarily justifiable to what the law says its right and wrong and there can be many factors that play into why a certain individual in a special case may not be guilty even though there is clear evidence that the crime was committed. It gives the jury a chance to plug in the factors of who, what, where, when and why and to treat each case as its own. Having the responsibility to use your own judgment holds great potential in a jury system as well as having a wide variety of people from different backgrounds leads to having a wide variety of opinions in a…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, this means that there may also be a prodigious amount of room for mistake in convictions. Therefore, the jury system is not as effective as a bench trial due to it not being judged by a professional on the subject of law, the manner in which the court selects jurors is unfair, and the way that the jury is forced to decide can cause some poor judgment. Judges are given the powers they have because they are professionals on their subject matter; however, a jury is not quite the same. A jury trial is a trial that has twelve randomly selected citizens coming to a verdict instead of a judge.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Main Juror Jury Functions

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Not every Juror, however, qualifies to attend a trial and determine the faith of the defendant. In order for a person to qualify as a juror, they are required to sustain certain functions in the court of law. That being said, the main function that a Juror must follow is the idea of determining who is a reliable witness and which statement is the most credible (Gardner and Anderson, 2010). Once the testimony has been evaluated…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine, you have lived your life without cause, you are a law abiding citizen, you have never been in trouble, furthermore, your life is established, your married, you have kids, the perfect job, life is excellent. Then one day, by haps, you are stopped, detained, arrested, charged with a crime, not just a crime, a violent crime, a crime that is unspeakable, child molestation! Your life is upside down, your wife, your family, your friends, even your co-workers all look at you differently. However, your innocent, and you protest such, to everyone who is willing to listen to you, however, you cannot get over the fact that no one is listening to your cries, now your life is in the hands of strangers, a prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, and…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You can, however, say that some of the jury would not be paying attention which could impact the trial but, a jury is made up of more than a couple of people. It is possible that a small portion of the jury would be listening to come up with a decision. This decision would either be the majority of the votes or the same decision would be chosen by people who were not paying attention to agree with the vast majority (Document D, Cartoon1). To continue, another reason for being in favor of jury systems is it prevents corruptions. In bench trials anyone can bribe the judge in order for them to win the case, but in jury trials you will not know who the people are until you show up in court.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    but there is time constraint and group think has been taken place in the movie. Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent is 12 Angry Men a critique of the legal system? The 1957 film, 12 Angry Men, revolves around the discussion in a courtroom regarding the alleged killing of a Hispanic boy’s father. Reginald Rose, through some of his characters, showcases the flaws in the legal system and how prejudice influences the men’s decisions. The film shows the racist, personal biases that sway the decisions of the men, as well as the un-cooperation between the jurors.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics