The more times you paired the wrong items the higher your preference was for the opposite. While this test may seem valid it does have several flaws. The first of which is how reliable are the IATs? The first time I took the Gender-Career test I was found to have a slight association of male with career and female with family. However the second time I took this same test my results were opposite. Saying I had a moderate association of females with careers and males with family. In order for tests to be reliable, they must have high repeatability. Meaning that one should be able to retake the same test and obtain similar results. Another flaw with the IAT is that results are easily skewed. The participant may be able to fake their results more favorable to the results they want to see by purposefully getting associations wrong. Which in turn ruins the validity of this test. People can determine the outcome and make themselves seem less bias which goes to show that implicit association tests are not factually
The more times you paired the wrong items the higher your preference was for the opposite. While this test may seem valid it does have several flaws. The first of which is how reliable are the IATs? The first time I took the Gender-Career test I was found to have a slight association of male with career and female with family. However the second time I took this same test my results were opposite. Saying I had a moderate association of females with careers and males with family. In order for tests to be reliable, they must have high repeatability. Meaning that one should be able to retake the same test and obtain similar results. Another flaw with the IAT is that results are easily skewed. The participant may be able to fake their results more favorable to the results they want to see by purposefully getting associations wrong. Which in turn ruins the validity of this test. People can determine the outcome and make themselves seem less bias which goes to show that implicit association tests are not factually