Sir Karl Popper's Discourse On Method

Improved Essays
“I think therefore I am”, was said by one of the most important philosophers from the Enlightenment period. This philosopher goes by the name of René Descartes. He used the deductive method to arrive to ‘truths’, which eliminated nonsense errors. However, it began when he questioned intellectual certainty. Descartes found the need to restore philosophy and the way that one should acquire knowledge. Thus, he sets himself to find a system, a method, that challenges skepticism. His famous work, entitled the Discourse on Method, originally written in French, explains the advantages of his method that should lead to unquestionable knowledge and scientific discoveries.

In part two of his discourse, Descartes presents his method and its rules.
…show more content…
He is a 20th century philosopher whose characteristic work was to find a theory that distinguished the difference between science and pseudoscience. This is the demarcation problem. He classified unfalsifiable as pseudoscience, or as unscientific, and vice versa. Popper made several considerations that discuss the importance to test scientific theories. This is found from an excerpt entitled Science:Conjectures and Refutations. It was believed that a scientific theory should be verified, meaning that is can demonstrated to be correct with evidence. For example, the followers of Marxist. Marxism was one of Popper’s targets. However, Popper believed that in order for a scientific theory to be certain, it should have the ability to be to falsified. However, Popper claimed that there was a bias for the people who believed in Marxism because of newspapers. Popper claimed that Marx’s predictions were not carried out for testing. Contrary, there was an ad hoc hypothesis which the theory was incapable of being falsified. Thus, he created a formula for proper scientific research. This is Popper’s formula : P1, TE, EE, P2. P1 is the initial problem , following is TE which is the tentative hypothesis, EE is the error elimination process where experiments are conducted and finally P2 is the new problem which is derived from the analysis the data and the conclusion of the TE (to be approved, or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I will outline two related skeptical arguments made by Montaigne, explicate them, and then provide Descartes response to these arguments, followed by a brief examination to determine which argument hold more persuasive power. I will begin by outlining two arguments presented by Montaigne, and then expand upon them to better explain their meaning and significance. The first argument I will discuss is the seventh argument presented by Montaigne in his work on skepticism, and proceeds as follows; “To judge appearances that we receive from subjects, we would need a judicatory instrument; to verify that instrument, we would need demonstration; to verify the demonstration, an instrument; here we are going round in a circle. Since the senses cannot…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sociology 313 Final Assignment In Collins’ Statistics versus Words, he states how in order to have adequate research, one needs to provide a hypothesis to have validity. He argued that if you don’t come up with a hypothesis before you examine the phenomena, you would not be able to test the evidence fully. He states that if you create your theory after finding evidence, there is no way to test the validity of the theory using that evidence. According to Keynes, he stated that those who provide evidence after coming up with a hypothesis essentially will have more weight placed on it as oppose to a theory that is created surrounding the findings.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to attain true knowledge, Descartes realized he would have to throw away all of his previous notions of truth and knowledge and start again from the original foundation of his knowledge. This foundation was that of sensory perception; Descartes did not believe that the information that we receive through our senses could be trusted, because they are often quite deceptive. Descartes plants the seed of doubt in the senses, and then throughout his meditations shows what he knows to be true. The following essay will describe how he comes to establish the truths at the start of his proof, the consequences of the proof and some of the flaws in his argument. To start his proof, Descartes begins by analyzing all of his basic beliefs.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas of truth and falsity are familiar concepts that pertain to any number discussion topics, especially those regarding higher power and error. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he seeks to validate his own thoughts, ideas, and beliefs through reasoning, and in doing so raises questions about the existence of God and the sources for error. Through the course of his argument, his premises and conclusions debate these topics, which allows the Meditations to be followed as a sequence of arguments. However, on the path of the argument, Descartes’ logic can be called into question, as well as his methods of distinction. As Descartes attempts to verify his previous knowledge, he causes his own arguments to be thrown into doubt.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Huemer’s essay, “The Lure of Radical Skepticism,” he expands on the idea that ‘we cannot know anything,’ by outlining four different arguments supporting the claim. (Huemer 47-57) René Descartes holds the opposite opinion, which he discusses in ‘Meditations One and Two.’ While there is validity to both sides of the argument, Huemer’s essay proves to be more reliable after dissecting Descartes’ concepts of existence. Huemer proposes that no one can know anything about the external world, or anything that exists outside of the mind.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The demarcation problem between science and pseudoscience is one of the Gordian knot problems in the field of philosophy of science. Several proposals have been made in this regard. Karl Popper proposes a ‘falsification principle’ that aims to test the scientific status of a theory. Kuhn has brought forward a claim against this principle that it is only applicable to occasional revolutionary parts rather than the most part of science. However, another attempt has been made by Lakatos in which a progressive research program draws the distinction between science and pseudoscience.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2. How does Kuhn 's view differ from Popper 's view of science? Kuhn 's view differs from Popper 's view of science in the way of scientific method. Popper sets a very high standard for scientific method by the principle of demarcation and criticism.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    René Descartes was a French philosopher born in 1596. He is often thought of the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. He is also recognized for his work in mathematics, and sciences, where he created a universal method of deductive reasoning. Although he is known for all of theses, his primary field of study was in Philosophy. His most famous quote is “I think, therefore I am” (first written in French “Je pense, donc je suis”).…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes associates as an Early Modern Thinker as he obtains opposing views from the Medieval Period. Descartes believes that the Medieval Period thinkers suffer corruption because of their theocentric views and negligence regarding advancing knowledge, as the medieval thinkers practice exegesis. Descartes concludes that an intellectual revolution is necessary in order to completely break with the corrupt past in order to gain new knowledge and truths. In order to achieve new truths and most certain knowledge, Descartes yearns for indubitably, the inability to doubt claims.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Once a hypothesis is proven to be plausible numerous times, than it turns into what is known as a theory. In science something can be proven to be false but nothing can be proven to be 100 percent…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is particularly important in concepts that involve past events, which cannot be tested. Take, for example, the Big Bang Theory or the Theory of Biological Evolution as it pertains to the past; both are theories that explain all of the facts so far gathered from the past, but cannot be verified as absolute truth, since we cannot go back to test them. More and more data will be gathered on each to either support or disprove them. The key force for change in a theory is, of course, the scientific method. A scientific law, said Karl Popper, the famous 20th century philosopher, is one that can be proved wrong, like “the sun always rises in the east.”…

    • 6226 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics