Effects Of The Imperial Presidency

Improved Essays
'The imperial presidency ' is a term first used in 1973 by Professor Arthur Schlesinger to describe a trend that had developed since the USA had entered the Second World War and subsequently entered the Cold War. Following the attack on Pearl Harbour, the constitutional restrictions specifying congressional checks on the President 's powers regarding foreign policy were seemingly relaxed in the following decades. For example, in 1950, President Truman sent troops to South Korea without congressional authorisation and this unconstitutional action was repeated by Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy and Nixon for various conflicts around the world. President Johnson even gained permission from Congress to do this due to the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, …show more content…
This included the Case – Zablocki Act of 1972, which forced the President to inform Congress of any executive agreements within 60 days of it happening and the War Powers Act of 1973 which reinforced Congress ' ability to be the one to authorise the use of troops. These actions arguably lead to another new era of the 'imperilled presidency ', in which the President was far more restricted in power to act without …show more content…
But, certainly in the sphere of foreign policy has since rescinded almost back to where they started with a President currently seeming to commit troops to another war in Iraq with no congressional authorisation. The events of September of 9/11 and the current war on terror seemingly allowed the imperial presidency to return to an imperial role because of public opinion – reversing the effects of Watergate to some degree. This, in theory, should have led to a return of the imperial presidency. But to apply that tag to Obama 's reign seems inappropriate, his constant struggles with Congress to apply any meaningful legislature at home during his two terms make it incredibly hard to apply that term to him. So perhaps the political scientist Aaron Wildavsky 's theory of a presidency that is strong abroad but weak at home is the most accurate in describing the modern

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rudalevige examines the ways in which the executive branch of government has evolved since it was first constructed under the founding fathers. He has found that the executive branch has become much larger and dramatically evolved since it was first created in the eighteenth century (Rudalevige, X, 2). Undoubtedly some changes were believed to be for the good of the country. At times these changes and expansions have proved to be fatal for the American citizens who were promised to be represented in the Legislative branch of government through the constitution. The creation of president’s dealing in “secrecy”, “deceit”, and “careless exercise of power” certainly developed through time (Rudalevige, 5).…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Forty Three men have served as the President of the United States. Each man brought his own ideas, philosophies and ambition to the office. Some of the these gentlemen have been credited with changing the presidency and defining the age, while others have been credited with being helplessly defined by the events of the era in which they held the office. History gives reverence to all of the men who served in what is considered the most powerful position not only in the United States, but also in the world. Perhaps history shows us, that it is not about getting elected to the Presidency that should be applauded, but how one handles the social, political, and economic climate, which he inherits.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By calling military action as “conflicts” instead of war, or by engaging on executive agreements rather than treaties. While the president throughout the course of history has become more involved in domestic affairs, there still seem to be more focus on foreign affairs. This is due to the fact that in foreign affairs the president is able to exercise his executive power more…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Presidential Power Dbq

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many historians believe that the power of the President has decreased over time. This assumption usually results from the President’s inability to line item veto, or rejecting individual provisions of a bill. However, after much reevaluation, many other historians argue that the power of the president has increased over time because of his unique powers that he does not share with Congress. A key role model during this increase of power is Andrew Jackson, symbolizing the expandment of presidential authority due to his significant enlargement of the use of vetoes. Mandates, or official orders from the President to do something, also symbolize an independent expansion of presidential power.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How has the power of the presidency changed over time? Drawing upon some historical examples, explain how presidents have acted to secure more power. What can the modern president do to overcome congressional, judicial, or bureaucratic opposition? How is a more powerful president beneficial/detrimental? Reference course readings, lectures, and examples as appropriate.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge, Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Richard Nixon all sent troops into foreign nations without approval from Congress. Richard Nixon’s presidency is a time in when the executive branch held much more power than Congress. Nixon controlled the spending of the country, a right the Constitution…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress itself has given the president powers that it does not constitutionally have, and the constitution is vague in some areas so the president takes advantage of the opportunity. For example, when he deploys troops to war without congressional approval because the constitution says he is the commander in chief. The role of the president has changed from weak to a strong one because he has more powers than the founding fathers intended. Institutional, cultural, and policy changes have altered the role of the Presidency because they caused the president’s power to strengthen and ultimately giving the impression that the president is the most…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Evolution Of Presidency

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This grants the President the power to veto any legislation, any bill that is to be voted on has to be sent to the President for review (UShistory.org). Though Congress has ways to go around the President to get bill passed to turn into laws (UShistory.org). If the bill were to sit on the President’s desk for more than ten days without him signing or vetoing then the bill becomes a law (UShistory.org). Congress can also over throw the President’s veto by a two-thirds vote…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that when Schlesinger speaks of an “ imperial presidency”, he is referring to the tendency of presidents to exercise their powers beyond the intended limits of the framers of the U.S constitution. (47). While the constitution is clear about the enumerated powers available to the executive branch, presidents such as Franklin Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln deliberately took matters into their own hands by making decision that was once deemed without the consent of congress ( 50). One example of this came when President Lincoln acted individually and authorized the increased power of the army and navy, as well establishing a voluntary military draft , all without congressional consent (50). Earlier presidents often kept their executive…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will address the extensive debate regarding presidential powers and the fact that, though unwise and poor law, the War Powers Resolution is not unconstitutional. In order to determine whether or not the War Powers Resolution intrudes too deeply on standing presidential power, it is first necessary to identify the legitimate executive prerogative that the Congress may have infringed upon. Opponents of the War Powers Resolution make a serious argument on intrusiveness regarding only one executive prerogative, the President's power as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States”, which is said…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The President of the United States seems to wield immense power; through executive orders and bill vetoing, it often appears that the president has a disproportionate amount of influence. However, other times, the president appears limited in his influence towards policy. Aaron Wildavsky proposed a Two Presidencies theory, which proposes that the president has significant power in relation to foreign policy, but limited power in relation to domestic policy. In reality, it seems that the president has power and influence, albeit checked by different branches and entities, in all areas of government.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The modern presidency is something of a media invention, partly out of convenience – we need a protagonist, a character through which to tell the story of American politics” (Achenbach). There is no argument that the President hold enormous influence on the nation and the world. By going public the President can gather support directly from citizens for a certain law, bill, treaty, war, etc., and while he or she might not be able to rally the entire nation in his or her favor, an address from the President has a tremendous pull on the nation or will at least get the world talking. But when it comes to policy making, the President influence is much more limited. For example, although the President can institute executive orders, these orders can be overturned by congressional hearing, judicial review, or the next president in office.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of US V. Curtiss

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people tend to wonder the actual power of the president. Is it just a title? Or is he secretly the most powerful man; much like a dictator? Well, by going back in time to specific court cases that could have swayed either way, one can easily tell that the president has more powers than everyone thinks. Many think that issues involving wars and foreign relations are solely powers given to the President, but these powers can be tested when problems occur that are not clearly stated in his job description.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Theodore Roosevelt was an American statesman, author, explorer, soldier, and naturalist he also served as President of the United States from 1901 to 1909. He is best known for his conservation efforts and his part in the Spanish American war. Roosevelt established the United States Forest Service, signed into law the creation of five National Parks, and signed the 1906 Antiquities Act, under which he proclaimed 18 new US national monuments. He also established the first 51 Bird Reserves, 4 Game Preserves, and 150 National Forests, including Shoshone National Forest, which was the nation's first. The area of the United States that he placed under public protection totals approximately 930,000 km.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, “The Perils of Presidentialism” Juan Linz observe that there are few stable democracies that have presidential systems of government. On the contrary, there are many parliamentary democracies and historically, they have performed better. Three major problems of presidential systems can be deduced from his essay; 1) Dual legitimacy, 2) fixed term, and 3) winner-takes-all logic. After explaining all three problems, this paper argues that winner-takes-all logic is as much applicable to parliamentary systems as it is to presidential systems.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays