Impartial Judges

Decent Essays
Judges should not be part of the political system, for then they are beholden to someone and may not be impartial as they should. The fault of any alliance to a political thinking is evidenced in the Supreme Court appointments as presidents appoint judges with whom they will have an alliance of ideology. History has recorded cases in which certain judges of the Supreme Court have, in their single presence or in their single absence, made the difference in a ruling. Judges should not be part of the political system, for then they are beholden to someone and may not be impartial as they should. The fault of any alliance to a political thinking is evidenced in the Supreme Court appointments as presidents appoint judges with whom they will have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge may also feel pressured to support the group who donated money to their election campaign. Another factor that may help correct the system would be to remove judicial party affiliation. Judges who are affiliated with either party are…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harry L. Carrico Essay

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judges whom are selected should not be biased nor infringe on the rights of mankind (Gustitis,…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ramona Salvarez Interview

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today I will be interviewing The Honorable Ramona Salvarez about her being an honorable judge. Me: How is your role in government different from an elected official? Salvarez: The role I play in the government differs from those who are elected officials.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “BAM!” with the slam of a gavel one life no longer seems to be in existence. Could you imagine having to hold another human's life in your hands as they say any and everything to convince you not to punish them from sob stories to logic, it’s a heavy burden to carry. On one hand you will make the world a better place but you will also be destroying his/hers life within seconds. Do you think you could make the right choice? These kind of choices can cause a dramatic impact on someone's mind.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merit Selection In Texas

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When our founding fathers created the American Constitution, it was very clear that they wanted the judicial system to be free from political influence. There are many opinions on how to achieve this goal: appointment by the governor, election by the voters and the merit selection. The merit select is a method of choosing judges using a nonpartisan commission of locate, investigate, evaluate and recruit applicants for the judicial system. Once the applicants have been selected the governor then makes the final decision. The selected judge serves a specific amount of time (typically one term) and then placed on a ballot, not as candidate but instead to ask voters if the judges should remain in office.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Deference

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction This paper is based on varied literature including journal articles, research papers, online resources, edited books, etc. The main focus of this paper is to examine the UK courts procedure in relation to the concept of deference with regards section 3 and section 4 of the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998, it’s limitations and the essence of judicial deference to legislation and the interference of Parliamentary supremacy. In addition, it would be potent to highlight ‘the judicial approach to the scheme of the HRA particularly the interpretation and application of the interpretive obligation laid down in s 3 and the power to declare legislation incompatible under s4 as well as the construction by the judiciary of a principle of deference’…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Responding to Dejon Warren post, I disagree with him allowing non-lawyers to serve as justices in the village courts, because these are ordinarily folks who not have a basic understanding of the law, or the legal procedures. During class, the professor discussed how the people in village do not take the election of these justices seriously, anyone can become a justice in these small towns even with little education background. How can they be impartial, and unbiased when they aren't familiar with the basic concepts of law that are in place? It is absolutely necessary for the judge to have a full knowledge of precedence in the courts, because he/or she are the ones making the decisions for the people in their town. Many articles even stated…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How is your role in government different from an elected official? The role I play in Government is my job is look over all of the evidence and understand it, and make sure every piece of evidence is presented. Also, the President appoints us rather than a Political Party which appoints elected officials. How is it the same? Judges and Elected officials share a common characteristic in the sense that both of us only want the best for the nation and the people.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being a judge is regarded as one of the most prestigious professions in the world. Depending on the court, whether the judgeship is state or federal, and the state, there are many different processes used for how judges take their office. Judicial selection has been a topic for discussion as people argue about which selection method is superior and why. As a proposal to Governor O’Malley, I will offer my opinion on which method should be used for the Maryland State Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, examine other methods, and ultimately provide why my solution is the ideal choice for judicial selection.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To maintain the strength of the Judicial Branch having a strong system to provide checks and balances of the other branches of government, there should be a certain level of independence for the Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch often has the last say in matters regarding judicial review, and because of this, they should be able to operate independently from the other two branches and serve as the final say in these matters. According to Padovano, Sgarra, & Fiorino, (2003), the judiciary is generally better positioned to check such unlawful behavior then voters, since he has access to much better information than they do. Voters that often want a bigger say in these rulings are not always the best options for keeping a strong checks and balances for the highest level of decision making that occurs in the judicial review process. A certain level of independence to the Judicial Branch can allow the certainty of a strong separation of powers and checks and balance system that cannot be controlled by the very parts of government it is trying…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Hanging Judge Analysis

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosopher, Jiddu Krishnamurti once said, “The ability to observe without evaluating is the highest form of intelligence.” (Vajda, 2009). However, every person on this planet is guilty of passing judgement on other individuals. Whether the evaluation be made in a local grocery store or in as contentious an environment as a United States courtroom, humans are all guilty of judging individuals by their perceived covers. In an ideal world, legal punishments would reflect officials’ objectivity toward permissible evidence, however, empirical research has revealed additional arbitrary factors.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays