Analysis: The Import Tariff On Iron

Superior Essays
The Import Tariff on Iron
The Morrill Tariff of 1861 effectively increase import tariffs in the United States. The tariff was implemented as a result of the start of the Civil War. The tariff increased rates to encourage manufacturers and ensure employment for industrial workers. The iron industry, in particular, was heavily impacted by the increased protection. At the time, the iron industry was an import competing sector. During this time, the demand for domestically produced iron was extremely sensitive to the price of imported iron. However, by the end of the 19th century iron was one of the largest manufacturing sectors in the US. These newly imposed high tariffs were meant to offset increased taxes that were necessary to fund the war.
…show more content…
iron industry: Domestic production and foreign competition”, Joseph H. Davis and Douglas Irwin discuss the role of import tariffs in the growth of U.S. manufacturing in the antebellum period. This article focuses on whether or not the iron industry could have survived without the import tariff, it “seeks to enhance our understanding of the antebellum iron industry’s vulnerability to foreign competition.” When import duties were raised in 1842 the production of pig iron more than doubled. At this time, imports did not increase; however, they did so rapidly when the tariff was reduced in 1846. “From this point, domestic production collapsed, falling 46 percent from 1847 to 1851, such that the volume of imports actually exceeded domestic production in 1851 and 1852.” In class, we concluded that tariff would cause quantity supplied to increase and imports to decrease. This is exactly what is seen here. When the tariff was higher, domestic firms produced more and imports from foreign firms decreased. The authors concluded that production of iron in the antebellum US was very sensitive to the relative price of imports, as well as domestic demand conditions. He discusses just how sensitive production was, saying slight rises in import prices coincided with increased U.S production. A decrease in import prices, caused domestic producers to suffer. Therefore, from this standpoint the iron industry needed the tariff in order to survive at this time. Unlike the previous, this article, does not consider the fact that iron consuming industries suffered from the tariffs. From these points, the gainers of the tariff were firms within the iron industry, as they enjoyed protection from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One of the major changes to come out of post-Civil War America and Reconstruction was the revamping of the South’s economy and labor force. In pre-Civil War South the economy was mainly agricultural and based upon slave labor. However, after the abolishment of slavery the South had to industrialize and therefore the labor force grew to encompass the production of tobacco. However, “of all other areas, the New South’s main success lay in its expansion of its textile production which began in the 1880s” (powerpoint)…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Effects Of King Cotton

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a result, planters bought more slaves and more land, in order to produce more cotton. The cotton was sent to the North and then shipped to England, so it could be argued that the economic prosperity of other areas depended on the peculiar institution of slavery. The exportation of cotton helped to stimulate the growth of the American economy. In fact, the South produced more than half of the world’s cotton supply by 1850 and cotton cloth became the single most important product manufactured in the United States. Many Southerners believed that the British would side with them if conflict were to break out between the North and the South. After all, British factories would be forced to close their gates if they didn’t receive Southern cotton. The rise of the Southern economy ensured that small farms became smaller and large plantations became larger. However, slaves were considered an investment of capital, which accounted for some of the financial instability of the plantation system. Rebuilding the economy proved to be a difficult task during the Reconstruction Era, since the South had previously relied on only one type of economic activity. Southerners were resentful towards the Yankee middlemen, bankers, agents, and shippers who reaped the benefits of cotton production. They realized that, despite the plantation system, the equipment they used was manufactured in the North, where they also sent the cotton fibers to be made into…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Much of the tariff revenue collected from Southern consumers was used to build railroads and canals in the North (Marotta & Russell, 2013). Between 1830 and 1850, 30,000 miles of track was laid. At its best, these tracks benefited the North. (Marotta and Russell). Those in Western states and manufacturers in the Mid-Atlantic States argued that strengthening the industrial capacity of the nation was in the interest of the entire country (Tariff of 1828). Some New England Congressmen saw what they believed to be long-term national benefits of an increased tariff, and voted for it; they believed the tariff would strengthen the manufacturing industry nationally (Tariff of 1828). The benefits that came from this tariff for the nation overpowered the fact that one section of the nation was receiving no profit from this…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result of the war, industries such as the manufacturing of clothes, flour and wheat grew rapidly to satisfy the demands of the war. Also, a large amount of money was invested in the production of war materials and basic materials. Therefore, following the Civil War, America rapidly expanded, cities grew and the economy thrived. The growing industrial and economic strength of America in conjunction with its newfound national unity, impacted the country in the long term and assisted the country’s rise to power. The establishment of a central, powerful government across the entire nation, provided a foundation for America’s rise as a world power. The war was advantageous to society, as becoming one unified nation, increased the strength of America as a foreign power, hence by 1870, America was growing as a strong national…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will discuss the way that war and economics have shaped the the development the United States. I want to focus on the two to three main points of history in each topic. On the economic side of things, I want to discuss Colonial America, Slavery, and The Great Depression. On the war side of things I want to discuss The Revolutionary War and The Civil War. Now there are more topics that I could dive into, but I would like to focus on some of the events and not all. Economics, as well as war, have played a pivotal role in Modern day America.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the Civil War, there were many economic differences between the North and South. For example, things produced in the South and North were different. In a letter to John Adams, Thomas Jefferson says, “We use little machinery. The Spinning Jenny and loom can be managed in a family; but nothing more complicated.” (Document 2) This means that the states in the North focused more on the use of machinery, while in South states, little machinery is used. This is also why Jefferson explains, “...we shall depend on your northern manufacturers.” (Document 2) Clearly, the South could not produce the same type of goods as the North. These differences may have begun during colonial times, when the New England colonies and Southern colonies already…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For much of the 21st century it was believed that slavery caused the economy of the Antebellum South to stagnate. Many historians took issue with the profitability of slavery and thought that its demise was inevitable, regardless of the Civil War. Some even consider the Antebellum South’s economy to be backwards in the sense that slave labour rates were so competitive that it resulted in the wages of other free workers to drop below the subsistence level (Conrad & Meyer 1971, 341). This created a deficit of skilled white labourers in the market and prevented a sustainable perfectly competitive labour market. In addition to this, slavery was criticized as being preventative to long-term economic growth. Slavery required capital outlays which…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since the founding of the U.S. a struggle for economic power has existed. John C. Calhoun voiced the opinion of countless southern farmers, on the tariff of abominations. “the proposed tariff was in fact little more than “an immense tax on one portion of the community to put money into the pockets of another.” The Northern and Southern states evolved into two very different territories, because of their vastly different economies. The diverse needs of the different economies caused economic policies controversial, because each policy could only support one economy. The Southern States were slave societies, relying on millions of slaves to maintain their vast plantations. The Northern states however did not need slaves. Some families owned…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Transcontinental Railroad had a substantial effect on trade within America, and also made the country stronger in the sense that ideas, culture, and thought were no longer kept on one side of the Mississippi. The economy of the United States felt a large surge as the railroad “shipped $50 million worth of freight coast to coast every year” (pbs.org). The…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Interpretation A supports the view that the First World War was the main reason for the booming economy as it gave impetus to agricultural and industrial expansion which is shown by the annual Gross National Product of the USA increasing by 40% during 1922-29. Furthermore, there was an increase of machinery and productivity, shown by the introduction of the assembly line which allowed for faster manufacturing, due to labour shortages during the war as the workers were at war this is a further viewpoint that World War One was the major reason for the booming industry in America during the 1920s. However, interpretation A also suggests that another major reason was that the government disregarding their policy of laissez-faire and assisting businesses…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Civil War DBQ

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Early in the 1800’s, sixty years before the war, the north had begun industrializing, but the south remained with an agrarian economy. While the north was building factories and…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Impending Crisis of the South” by Hinton Helper, Helper notes that the South had a strong dependence on the North for manufactured goods and for materials needed in construction (Document 3). The majority of the Southern economy was centered on farming and agriculture due to the land’s fertile soil, which forced Southerners to purchase goods from the North. Allen Weistein and R. Jackson Wilson’s “Resource of the Union and Confederacy, 1861” reveals that the North dominated the South in almost every aspect regarding resources except for in cotton production (Document 2). The supremacy of the North meant that Congress often favored to pass import tariffs in order to decrease competition with American manufacturing. The South depended on imported goods but these tariffs forced the South to buy products from the North, allowing anti-North sentiments to develop. In comparison with the North, the South had fewer railroads running through the major cities (Document 1). Although the South often had to ship cotton and other crops across the country, fewer railroads available for Southern use meant that it was more difficult for Southerners to bring their products to the North for sale, which did not help in stimulating their economy. Since the South ran on slave labor, the differing economies also meant differencing opinions on…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who Is Andrew Jackson Dbq

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ii) The tariff mainly helped the North, and the South called the tariff of 1828 the Tariff of…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The north’s rocky geography and harsh winters with short growing season didn’t allow for profitable farms like it did in the South. Instead, the North became an industrialized region, where steam powered factories produced textiles that used the souths raw cotton. The problem with the differing economies rested on the fact that the south felt that they were being unfairly taxed. Taxation had been granted to the United States federal government through the United States Constitution. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of the US constitution states that ““The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises”. However, when the Tariff of 1828 was passed, it raised tariffs on goods in south by as much as 50%, thus gaining the nickname Tariff of abominations. Since it raised taxes on imported goods, it benefited the North by discouraging the South from buying goods that weren’t manufactured in the North. The south felt that this was unfair, with…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These tariffs were the Morrill Tariff, the tariff of 1842, and the tariff of abominations in 1828. One of the most noticeable differences between the south and the north was their economies. The south main economic source was from agriculture where as the north was very diverse and advanced and a large part of their economy was based on an industrial system. This contributed to the war because the south used slaves as a way of labor and the north disapproved of this. Many northerners feared that slavery would expand into northern states and they would lose their jobs to slaves. They also feared if the slaves were freed they would have competition for their jobs and potentially loose them. A simple solution would have been to follow the Missouri compromise however as the nation grew slavery would expand west into new states which was against Republicans goal. The Republicans wanted to stop the expansion of slavery and if they followed the compromise then slavery would be…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays