Impact Of John Locke On Globalization And Capitalism

Improved Essays
John Locke (1632—1704), an English philosopher and political theorist, was a strong supporter of limited government and free market capitalism. Capitalism occurs when a country’s trade and industry is controlled by private owners for profit, rather than the government. Locke also had radical opinions on the right to private property. Karl Marx (1818–1883), a German philosopher who was skilled in economics, law, theology and literature, was a revolutionary socialist who believed in the abolishment of private property. Unlike free market capitalism, socialist governments maintain control over the production and distribution of goods, attempting to ensure economic equality for its citizens. Two different men, two different centuries, with opposing points of view who continue to influence today’s economic thoughts. What would these men think of the economic impact of the globalization and terrorism we have seen since the …show more content…
The peso was devalued and economies were affected worldwide. The United States sent Mexico a $50 million bailout and Mexico recovered. Several years later, the United States bailed out banks, insurance companies, mortgage lenders and automakers. These bailouts affected many nations invested in the United States such as China, France and Germany (Gayner, 2008).
John Locke would have been frustrated by the bailouts. Locke believed the chief purpose of government was to protect the rights of individuals, not other governments. Locke argued that through a social contact, men willingly gave up some rights to ensure liberty and property ownership, but the men could take back the rights if the government failed to protect those rights. Since Locke also supported a free market economy, he would have considered the bailouts to be government overreach. However, Locke would approve of a global economy as it is based on free

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rather than believing in “healthy competition,” Wilson believed in fair play. Along with his effort to eradicate the trusts, Wilson gave the power towards the small companies by advocating for their fair treatment. Because the small companies are the trusts’ rivals in some cases, Wilson made sure the power of the trusts did not overshadow the companies trying to gain funding and develop their brands. Additionally, Wilson admired the entrepreneurs who invented new methods and materials, calling them the next generation of American “brains” (Wilson). In his address on his antitrust efforts, Wilson pointed to Andrew Carnegie as an example of American…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx is a socialist political theorist who brought revolutionary change and Locke is a liberal political philosopher. Marx critiques Locke's liberal theories such as the state of nature, private property, labor, money, and slavery. In Locke's state of nature, all men had natural rights to be equal and free without anyone placing harm on his life, liberty, and property. Marx believed that liberalism instead of providing equality among citizens it was promoting inequality. When Marx critiques Locke's liberalist theories he proves some contradictions that Locke was against.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Industry Coercion Analysis

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Well, What about Industry Coercion? A common discussion within the political community is whether or not the state should have a role in its economy. Friedrich Hayek, a distinguished political philosopher, believes that free market capitalism is the most viable option as an economic system for a free society. He believes this due to the fact that it is possible for the state to be a coercive agent, which inhibits the most basic of human rights: freedom. Because of this, he does not think the state should interfere in economic processes.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marx uses his labor theory, which involves the capitalist profit analysis of exploiting the proletariat, to make the economic analysis of capitalism. Besides this, he complains that the intellectual creations of individual nations become common property, and national one-sidedness and limitations are no longer possible. He believes that communism will create a classless society and equality of all individuals and explains the first goals of the communist parties: formation of the proletariat into a class level, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat, and not the abolition of property in general, but the abolition of bourgeois property. In this regard, communism was formed in the Western world before…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although, it is beneficial for economies to grow past the models set forth for them hundreds of years prior, it is also important to maintain a moral foundation to prevent corruption, something that the American economy has failed to do. Rather than follow Smith’s plan for beneficial self-interest kept in balance by strong sympathy or concern for the well being of others, the economy has lost sight of these things in an effort to maximize growth and transcend limits. Actions such as these were supported by Hayek, who believed that altruism was best exhibited not by traditional altruistic acts, but by simply following rules and traditions that were in place in flourishing societies. Because of this, economics lost the sympathy and trust that balanced the system. In order to restore this balance, it is necessary that moral foundations, such as the ones proposed by Cavanaugh and Smith, be reintegrated as vital contributors to the function of modern…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Smith brings up government involvement in capitalism in “The Wealth of Nations” he states, “The exclusive privilege of an incorporated trade necessarily restrains the competition, in the town where it is established, to those who are free of the trade” (Smith). In Adam Smith’s perspective, as shown in the quote, is that the government involvement will counteract the ability to have proper competition with other industries and therefore promoting the creation of monopolies. His thoughts, while some cases can be true, is not applicable to modern times. In today’s economy, specifically the U.S., there is slight government interaction in the capitalist economy, such as the Fiscal and Monetary Policies. Adam Smith at that time was unable to understand each possible issue with the economy, and as time went on, the need for government monitoring to fix recessionary and inflationary issues became…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Market democracy acts as an effective hybrid between the two schools of liberal thought. Libertarians, with their emphasis that economic liberty is the paramount liberty, are attracted to market democracy’s contention that economic liberties are at least just as important as any other liberty. High liberals, with their emphasis on social justice, are attracted to market democracy’s acknowledgment that social justice is relevant. With that being said, both ideological groups disagree with parts of a market democracy. High liberals may claim that any system with thick economic liberty has potential problems, such as market failure or exploitation of workers.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    9. Adam Smith gave the theory of Laissez - Faire which believed in individual freedom. Adam Smith propounded that the individuals, in doing good for themselves would also end up doing good for the society as they would be guided by an ‘invisible hand’. Smith viewed the Government as wasteful, spend - thrift and corrupt and wanted least intervention by them in the economic affairs of a country. He also believed in a harmony of interests that existed between different sections of the society.…

    • 2608 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx supports the lower-class and he believed that the state should control people’s lives and give free education, healthcare, and housing. Workers support Karl because he thinks that they should be wealthy and not everything is for the rich. The owners supported Adam because he says that they are the ruling class and that they should have all the wealth. Adam wanted to make it hard for poor by increasing prices which helps owners. On the other hand Smith wanted to make the poor’s life better with more money, and that the poor should be treated…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He thinks that maintaining private property is more liberating than the Marxist proposal for shared property. Without individual property the economy lacks incentive, motivation, as well as expert managers. These two features of private property spur completion, which creates economic growth. Furthermore, he sees a revolution as more chaotic then any cyclical chaos capitalism produces. Also in relation to the communist view point, Mill understands attacks on private property as overstating flaws or misunderstanding the economy.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics