Negative implications
Economic development
Younas (2014) argues that the neo-liberal model employed by Globalisation, will adversely affect the growth of terrorism, as the progress in economic development reduces the incentives for people to engage in terrorism out of despair and/or poverty because capital will flow from the capital-abundant to the capital-scarce. This view is contrary to the earlier thoughts of inequality, but Younas (2014) states that economic reform geared for greater openness, is not just a source for growth but also a tool, which is effective at tackling the harmful effects of terrorism in developing countries. This is backed up by Zimmermann (2011), who wrote that increasing economic development through globalisation is to provide something more attractive than terrorism (P159).
Multilateral cooperation
Globalisation has made it easier for multilateral efforts between nation-states, international policy structures and treaty organisations to control and manage global events (Khan, 2001). International efforts are being enforced globally, increasing the greater scrutiny of banks and the flow of capital, to identify in greater detail who the intended recipients of transactions are and the real identify of the donors (khan, 2001). Governments are increasing international …show more content…
Subhash (2012) writes that it is difficult to prevent terrorism in the present situation, because postmodern terrorism needs globalisation for power and expansion, but so does the independent and interconnected globalised world. The two seem inextricably linked, that is if globalisation slows, then both situations are effected. It seems that as if global interdependence is irreversible, then the facet of globalisation, international terrorism, is also
Economic development
Younas (2014) argues that the neo-liberal model employed by Globalisation, will adversely affect the growth of terrorism, as the progress in economic development reduces the incentives for people to engage in terrorism out of despair and/or poverty because capital will flow from the capital-abundant to the capital-scarce. This view is contrary to the earlier thoughts of inequality, but Younas (2014) states that economic reform geared for greater openness, is not just a source for growth but also a tool, which is effective at tackling the harmful effects of terrorism in developing countries. This is backed up by Zimmermann (2011), who wrote that increasing economic development through globalisation is to provide something more attractive than terrorism (P159).
Multilateral cooperation
Globalisation has made it easier for multilateral efforts between nation-states, international policy structures and treaty organisations to control and manage global events (Khan, 2001). International efforts are being enforced globally, increasing the greater scrutiny of banks and the flow of capital, to identify in greater detail who the intended recipients of transactions are and the real identify of the donors (khan, 2001). Governments are increasing international …show more content…
Subhash (2012) writes that it is difficult to prevent terrorism in the present situation, because postmodern terrorism needs globalisation for power and expansion, but so does the independent and interconnected globalised world. The two seem inextricably linked, that is if globalisation slows, then both situations are effected. It seems that as if global interdependence is irreversible, then the facet of globalisation, international terrorism, is also