Kant's Categorical Imperative Analysis

Improved Essays
Mussaya Thanthima PHL-210-01 10-13-17

Immanuel Kant’s theory of the categorical imperative states that those duties are moral if they are universally applicable. This duty that does not contain a motive or goal from which one could either benefit or not.It is good because it is universally applicable. According to Kant this duty consist in just doing the right thing simply because it is right. An example of such a duty, is when you see a boy scout helping an elderly person across the street. This is a morally good thing to do be because it applies to everyone and is not utilitarian. The boy scout does not do it for a reward, such as earning a badge of pure good moral or nature. Since oneself can have a motive behind helping the elder, like the boycott who might just be helping the elder cross the street for a badge and not doing it out of pure good moral or nature.It would not be a duty if the boy scout did it with a desire of wanting a badge. Since a duty is a universal law that applies to everyone and just not to oneself or a few people. A corollary to this law is that each human has a “duty to oneself.” (Grounding, 30). Since this
…show more content…
This maxim relates to the categorical imperative as Kant says “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that if should become a universal law.” (Grounding, 30) To define our moral duties we must only act by a maxim that will become a universal law. A universal law is an action or duty that has no reason or desire behind it. A law that everyone could use or do. A duty that fits in with this maxim and universal law is the duty to not kill oneself. No one should kill herself even though life can get tough and horrible. One person should not kill herself over it. She should live through it and hope things get better, since a person life is short. You do not want to take it for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will discuss Kant’s moral reasoning, both broadly and in terms of a case study, and elaborate on some issues with Kantian ethics. The core of Kant’s ideas on morality is his statement that "nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good without qualification, except a good will". He defines this good will as “the will which acts from freedom and respect for the moral law”, meaning that one must choose by their own volition to pursue morality. Kant believes the only purely good thing is this idea of good will. In saying this, Kant draws a line between good will and traits like happiness, wealth, and even health that are usually thought to be good.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative means that anytime an act is made, it must be able to stand as a universal law. It provides us with a pattern of morals that does not contain anthropological information. There are five major complaints to Kant’s theory. First, people believe that it is too hard to apply to real life. Next, it does not include enough acts that are common in real life.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant argues that duty is based solely on reason (Kant,81). Kant believes that the act of lying, murdering, robbery are the wrong action and we have a duty not to do these things. According to Kant, consequences are not what makes an act right, but the right action makes the act right. Also, our good motives or intentions will lead us to the good path without qualification. The Categorical Imperative is the supreme principle of morality.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Angelica Mariano- Paper 2 Kant “Let justice be done, though the world perish.” In the late eighteenth century, Immanuel Kant emerged as one of the leading philosophers of his time and focused on deontological ethics, which focused on the morality of actions. Kant developed his work entitled, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, in which he gives a clear understanding of moral principles. In this work, he developed the categorical imperative, which is suppose to provide a way for us to make moral judgements.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An Exploration of Othello: Delving into the Mind Frame of Desdemona and Iago Immanuel Kant’s view on ethics and morality is that in order to determine if we are acting in a fashion that can be deemed moral, we have not only a duty to ourselves but others. It is duty that determines our actions. Kant establishes certain limitations and restrictions upon the notion of duty, narrowing down a definition which would allow us to therefore be able to readily distinguish “whether the action which agrees with duty is done from duty, or from a selfish view” (Kant 2). In order to figure out whether our actions correspond to this concept of duty, Kant has established what is known as the categorical imperative which states that you should reflect upon your actions and be comfortable with them becoming a universal law. Insofar as duty is concerned, if we follow this principle it allows for a broader understanding of what is meant by moral and ethical behaviour.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s impact on Western thought is undoubtedly profound. Being one of the most distinguished figures of the German Idealist movement of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Kant’s work has set a precedent that, to this day, deeply influences our understanding of ethical discussion, political philosophy, and human cognition. Kant’s multiple contributions still are subject of debate; although, it is his Categorical Imperative that gathers the most attention, discourse, and controversy. Being a reaction to the subjectivity of his era, the Categorical Imperative provides an objective and infallible guideline for universal moral behavior, that stipulates one’s actions should not be dependent on ulterior motives and in consideration that the act itself will become universally accepted, ergo, if one were to steal then one should also be accepting of…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant refers to an imperative as an obligation to do something. Kant explains “the categorical imperative declares the action to be objectively necessary without referring to any end in view … hold as apodictic practical principle” (Kant, pg.35). Within the categorical imperative types of duties are part of the formula. A human being can be faced with two types of duties, perfect duties and imperfect duties. Within the two types of duties are two different people the action could affect; oneself or others.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believes your duty creates the motives you should act on. A Kantian example of good and bad motives starts with feeding a hungry homeless man. Using Kant’s explanation of bad motives, imagine you are walking with your friends and you see a homeless man. Thinking about how good you will look in front of your friends if you buy the man a lunch. You walk to the store and purchase a lunch and give it to the man.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Decision Making Model Ethics plays a very strong role in all forms of communication. From a conversation being held between family members to a supervisor speaking to a lower level employee, there is a code of ethics involved. Ethics is something that has been engrained into us from the time we were first brought into this world. It continued to be shaped and molded through family experiences and interactions.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is Kant’s ultimate principle of morality. However, Kant does not believe his principle of morality illustrates that humans are bound by his categorical imperative. Kant's…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This principle states that an action is morally acceptable only if it’s maxim is universalizable. There are three main steps to this principle: 1) formulate maxim, 2) imagine a world where everyone acts on it, 3) ask whether the action would be achievable in that world. If yes, the action is permissible. This shows a key difference between the principle of utility, as an action isn’t required with Kant, they’re merely acceptable. The next underlying principle with Kant’s theory is the principle of humanity.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays