Immanuel Kant's Four Ethical Theories

Decent Essays
Once I read the assigned readings these are the four ethical ideas/theories I found interesting.

Reading Six Kantian Ethics was founded by Immanuel Kant. According to Kant, nothing is completely "good" because it can always be associated to something bad. As the book said, whether it be “talents of the mind", "character" or "gifts of fortune" these "things in themselves", are not good. The only thing that can be called good is good will. Good will isn't good because of what it attains even though it gets good results, but by virtue of its existence, the sole purpose to produce good. Whether it produces that good or not, it in itself is good. According to what the book and Kant say, happiness is not a product of reason but rather reason actually reduces people’s happiness. Instead, reason produces good will. Another thing Kant talks about is the relationship between a good will and duty. A good will is a will that acts for duty and actions are only moral if they are driven by duty, good will in turn. Acting when duty is the only reason to act is morally right. Duty does not have to be pleasant, just morally right. Kant believes that we should do certain things for people or for ourselves not whether it is right or wrong but rather because it is our
…show more content…
In capitalist societies, people become just a piece in the puzzle when what they work for isn’t theirs and their lives are controlled by others of higher classes. When human alienation occurs, people lose their stateliness which leads to people being treated as animals. According to Karl Marx, capitalism creates a division in a society. It creates class of labor. People who were once useful and a major part of the system, suddenly become useless nobodies. Marx says that when the division of classes disappear then any problems with it disappear along with it. Also moral principles will no longer have a need to

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carlyle Vs. Marx

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “As of September 14, 2016, Britannica.com listed on its website. . . Karl Heinrich Marx a revolutionary, historian, sociologist, and economist was born May 5th 1818 in the city Trier located in Rhine, Prussia. Marx was the oldest boy of nine children. In 1835 attended the University of Bonn for a year then went to Berlin to study philosophy and law. Eight years later Marx married Jenny von Westphalen who was smart and attractive to the eye.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are six evaluative principles that are used to evaluate moral theories. They are Consistency, Applicability, Publicity, Internal Support, External Support, and Explanatory Power. I am going to evaluate Divine Command Theory, Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, and Virtue Ethics using these six evaluative principles. First is Divine Command Theory (DCT). For Consistency, DCT is consistent because God either commands an act to be either right, wrong, or it is permissible if God has not claimed if it is right or wrong.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When it comes to deciding which of the five workable and ethical theories, Kantianism, Social Contract Theory, Act Utilitarianism, Rule Utilitarianism, and Virtue Ethics, that others use to guide their moral decision making, people tend to follow closely to one, a combination of two, or use which ever theory that will validate their decision or benefit them the most. I personally lean towards a combination of Kantianism and Virtue Ethics. In my everyday life, it is important that I continue to build and develop my character such as patience, kindness, and honesty to be able to flourish and live a truly, happy life as I continue my life after graduation and into adulthood. I lean heavily towards Kantianism because I believe it is especially important to follow the first and second formulation of the categorical imperatives as a moral guideline. It is important to make a moral decision if an action can be followed by everybody and I believe it is important to not use people and treat others as a means to an end because I believe using people for my own benefit would weaken and diminish my character as a person.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this world division of labor and capitalism is essential for capitalist, most people would also think is important for the workers as well. Which it is for a period of time, but after a while the benefit fades away. There are more negative consequences of division labor and capitalism than you think. This essay will analyze all the negative consequences of the division and labor and capitalism arguments by Smith, Marx, and Durkheim. In Adam Smith’s book “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” Smiths argue that the division labor destroys “intellectual social and martial virtues”.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most of the theories that are presented by philosophers is to help us figure out who we are, what the goal of my life should be, and what is considered morally right and wrong. These theories are supposed to guides us in making decisions, however each human being is the only one to determine was they believe is good in their lives. Theories are nothing more than just guidelines made by philosophers who think will make the best human being. We could use bits of their knowledge in helping us live our own lives, but we could also completely reject their views and live life based on our own theories and motives. Philosophers like J.S. Mill, Kant, and Aristotle, have unique and profound minds in the way they describe human nature, and what human…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes And Forced Labor

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Karl Marx, our current capitalistic society is damaging to individuals who work under forced labor in the modes of production because it produces alienation. We are alienated from what we produce, and we are alienated from the modes of production. The most prominent example is when workers work in factories. Workers produce private property by putting all of their creative energy in the form of monotonous tasks into objects that is not for themselves, but instead for people who likely did not put any work into its creation. Worker work in environments that seek to maximize profits, even at the expense of the workers.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay I am writing today I will be comparing utilitarianism; also called consequentialism, and Kantian ethical theories. The attitude towards what is right or wrong is what constitutes the basic difference between the two theories. Utilitarianism says an act is justified if the end result is happiness for all. The Kantian theory states that end does not justify means, and whatever we do inside our obligations is morally good.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capitalists do not need to do and work themselves they use their workers to earn them money by producing their products. As the capitalist owns the factories and other means of production, they know and control the finances of the business, additionally they own all the products that are made by their business even though the products are made by their proletarian workforce. The products that the workers make strengthen the capitalist’s business, the capitalist is further strengthened when the proletarians buy the products from the capitalist’s business. This starts a vicious cycle that always ends up in the capitalist favour as he is strengthened not only by the products that his workers make but also by the proletariats. Karl Marx comments on this alienation are displayed through his manuscripts, Marx states “In the sphere of the political economy the realisation of labour appears as a loss of reality for the worker, objectification as loss of and bondage to the object and appropriation as estrangement and alienation” (Marx, 1959).…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx critiques the ideologies of capitalism, more specifically the necessity of class conflict through the texts The Economic & Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, Capital, The German Ideology and predominantly in The Communist Manifesto. He calls for an eventual societal restructure that is less dependent on morality, but a restructure through the use of logic. Marx argues that the opposing interests of the bourgeoisie and proletariat as a necessity for capitalism to function will have negative long term effects. Initially, a capitalist economy will lead towards innovation , appearing to move away from the structural flaws of feudal society, but over time the system will break down causing the a decrease in profit margins for the bourgeoisie, but more importantly the immiseration and exploitation of the proletariat workers through the commoditization of their labour and the commoditization of themselves . Marx proposes that the only way to break free from this cycle is through revolution subsequently creating a classless society called “communism”(!); a societal system where the means…

    • 1049 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Having a social class separates the human race as a whole. By having everyone work and earn equally it decreases the amount of greed, competition and takes away the class system. But Capitalism creates the social class, competition of wealth, greed and selfishness in people. People who tend to be greedy and selfish goes to great lengths to have with the other person wants which creates problems between. Capitalism creates this greed and selfishness within people.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under Kant’s ethical foundations, there are many distinctions that are established; the main one being the empirical and “pure” sides of life. The empirical side is one based off of one’s personal experiences while the pure side is prior to experience. Kant’s focus is primarily on the “pure” side and not the empirical because the empirical side is filled with distractions that get in the way of the universal. The universal is what matters most, not the individual. The death penalty has been a controversial issue for many years.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx describes the two classes of society to be the Bourgeoise, who are the capitalists, and Proletariat, who are the working class. Due to the capitalist ideology that the working class can reach a higher standard of living through hard work, they continue selling their work as a commodity and in turn fall victim to alienation. The fruits of their labour become a service to the capitalists, thereby losing meaning. Only with the realization of their exploitment can the working class revolt and establish a socialist government, thus achieving Marx’s end goal of a communist society.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays