Immanuel Kant's Early Intellectual Development

Improved Essays
Immanuel Kant was born on April 22, 1724, in Konigsberg. He was the fourth of the nine children of a poor harness-maker. Kant’s parents were simple people and devout pietists. From the age of eight to sixteen years, Kant attended the Collegium Fridericianum, a Pietist school dedicated to the instruction of mathematics, history, geometry, and above all, Latin. In 1740, Kant matriculated at the University of Konigsberg. Under the inspiration of his favorite teacher, Kant immersed himself in the study of natural science and philosophy. In fact, it was his teacher, Martin Knutzen, who introduced him to the writings of the two thinkers who had the greatest impact on his early intellectual development: Isaac Newton and Christian Wolf. For approximately

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The book is designed to provide a textbook that gives insight defining the differences and differing perspectives to Christian Ethics. The book also provides a comprehensive analysis three of the distinct phases of western Christianity. The book is divided into five sections, the first section pertaining to the methodological issues in Christian ethics. The second through section four focuses on the issues in social ethics. Section five pertains to the personal status.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chan Dr. Whitman Phil 1301 1 May 2017 Kant Paper Immanuel Kant was a man of knowledge and self-awareness. He was well known for the development of ethical formulas in his book Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. One important formula that will be introduced is the Humanity formula. When using this formula, Kant explain why or why…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Immanuel Kant’s, “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals”, the morality of action is questioned, defined, and explained. To do so, Kant brings up an example of several people, two of which either, “preserve their lives”, or, “act charitably” out of pure, “natural inclination” (Kant). The other two are performing the same actions, but, in stark contrast to the other two individuals, are acting because of a, “motive of duty”, or maxim (Kant). Kant explains that those who acted out of duty are only deserving of moral status for their actions, and those who acted out of impulse do not. After much deliberation, I have agreed with Kant’s perspective of what comprises a moral action.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J.S Mill and Immanuel Kant both had their own very convincing theories regarding how to determine if an action/choice is morally permissible or not. Mill’s Principle of Utility focuses on the quality and quantity of happiness produced to determine the morality, while Kant’s Categorical Imperative concentrates more on our intentions. According to Mill’s Principle, Pat should not tell Chris that she cheated, because it would create more pain than pleasure. The pain that Chris would feel after finding out he was cheated on and the pain Pat would feel after being broken up with outweighs the happiness/pleasures of them both, so according to Mill, telling Chris would not be a morally permissible action. According to Kant’s Categorical Imperative,…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Stewart Mill and Immanuel Kant are two of the most influential philosophers in history. Their philosophies of utilitarianism and deontology, respectively, have different fundamental values and priorities. The fundamental principle of utilitarianism is that actions are morally correct in proportion to how much happiness they create, henceforth all people should strive to promote happiness and pleasure. Happiness, Mill states, is the ultimate objective of all human actions; one shall prefer those actions which yield the most happiness.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Chapter 5 Sandel introduces us to the philosopher Immanuel Kant. This chapter talks focuses on Kant’s view on motive such as: What is the Supreme principle of morality and what is human freedom? Kant believes that morality is based on universal law. Kant calls this act categorical imperative. The idea is that you should treat everyone how everyone would want to be treated.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Questions pertaining to whether certain actions are morally right or morally wrong are never easy to settle. There are various moral theories that try to address the question, divine command theory, virtue ethics, ethical egoism, cultural relativism, to name just a few. There is, of course, not much agreement among moral philosophers as to which is correct. There is, however, much agreement on what is actually morally right or morally wrong. The merits of a particular moral theory will depend (in part) on whether or not it can account for actions most of us consider to be right.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant an 18th century German philosopher considered rather notable for his work in ethical philosophy. Kant was responsible for the book Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morality and his work remains relevant today as a crucial ‘part of Western Moral Philosophy’. Kant argues that reason is what predisposes what is right. Kant believed that religion should not be taken into consideration when determining what is morally right. Kant’s reasoning of this is explained that if one only gaged what is right based on religion this would not result in a ‘supreme principle of morality’ for all people.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosophies of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are essentially polar opposites of one another, but in the most basic form they have similarities. Mill’s main belief was in utilitarianism, ascertaining that individuals should act in such a way as to maximize overall utility, and the preponderance of pleasure over pain. Kant classified as a transcendental idealist, holding that experiences are governed by necessary causal laws, which almost posits itself into a subsection of rationalism, as causal laws are often with reason. The philosophies of the modern philosophers Kant and Mill have disparities in a wide variety of areas, such as ethics, and have minimal similarities.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant would advise Martin Luther King. Jr. to reject paternalism and address the causes of a lack of enlightenment and the preconditions necessary to make it possible for individuals to enlighten themselves. Immanuel Kant’s interpretation of enlightenment would be a general starting point for Martin Luther King to respond to Birmingham’s Racial Segregation Ordinance. Immanuel Kant’s literature on What is Enlightenment argues that the motto of enlightenment is to use your own understanding and reason, however the majority of people are content to follow the guiding institutions of society, such as the Church and the Monarchy. This fallacy is the main proponent of why individuals lack the courage to use their own reason, intellect,…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The three ethical theories were made by three famous philosophers Aristotle, John Stuart Mill, and Immanuel Kant. These three philosophers are arguably the most famous philosophers in the branch of normative ethics. Normative ethics deals with the moral standards that regulate our actions and categorize them as whether they’re right or wrong. The theories of ethics consist of Aristotle's Virtue Ethics, Mill's Utilitarianism, and Kant's Deontological Ethics. I believe that Aristotle’s theory is closer to the truth than the others.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Paul D. Cottingham Fr. Kurt Messick Epistemology September 13, 2014 Kant’s and Hume’s epistemology Immanuel Kant and David Hume were notable philosophers within the modern era, each with their own respective ideology and philosophy; Kant was influenced by rationalism, crafted a theory after the Copernican Revolution explaining the role of human reason in obtaining knowledge, whereas Hume, who was influenced by skepticism, put an end to pure reason and an end to the Enlightenment Era. In the following term paper I will first give a definition of epistemology, followed by explaining in detail Kant’s distinction between analytical and synthetical judgments as well as compare the similarities and differences between Kant’s distinction between…

    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Maxim

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rayan Sariedine Professor Hernandez Ethics 8 July, 2016 Moral Law A “maxim” is a basic principal that a person applies to their actions in life, that an individual uses in making decisions, i.e. motivation, goal, or context. Maxims generally are any simple guide for living. All of the decisions in a person’s life, which presumably are based on different maxims lead a person into an individual path in life. In Kant’s mind maxims are completely subjective.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays