Immanuel Kant: What Makes An Action Good

Decent Essays
Throughout the years, philosophers have asked what makes an action good. For example. What if you see an infant in the middle of the road? A car is coming up a hill and can’t see the infant. You quickly try to run in the road to save the infant but the car get to it first. Can your actions still be considered morally good? It depends on who you ask because each philosopher have different views and theories on situations. Immanuel Kant would say that the moral worth of your actions are determined totally on whether if you were motivated by duty whereas John Mill would say that the worth of your actions are determined by the amount of happiness it produces and for the greatest number of people. So if it is your duty to attempt to save the infant …show more content…
He produced new ideas and published works about the nature of reality and free will. Majority of his remarkable understandings can be inaugurated in the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) and Metaphysics of Morals (1798) which grounds his personal moral philosophy. Kant believes in the theory of deontology which states that we are morally obligated to act in accordance with a certain set of principles and rules regardless of the outcome meaning that what’s right is right and what’s wrong is wrong despite what the situation may be. “An act has moral worth, not because it has good consequences nor because it was the right thing to do, but only because it was done from a certain motive: it was done because it was the right thing to do.” (Kant and Moral Motivation). In this scenario, Kant would save that one particular Indian’s life from getting killed by the captain but even though the other 19 Indians lives would be saved by allowing that one Indian to die would not justify making that decision to accept that request from the captain. He would consider on helping that one Indian before the rest of them because that one Indian has already been selected to be killed. Not saying that Kant would be immoral if he doesn’t help the other Indians but due to the fact that one Indian has already been selected, it’s only moral to help him because Kant doesn’t know for certain if the captain wouldn’t …show more content…
John Mill’s ethical approach on my view is superior because according to Kant, when a man acts immorally, he forfeits his rights. Therefore, we are not compelled to act morally towards immoral men. Morality is relative to an individual. For example. Serial killers would probably tell you that they know what they’re doing is wrong but they still killed for pleasure. That would be acting out of Mill’s utilitarianism. Then you have people that would argue that although society considers their murders immoral, they themselves believe that they are doing a good thing. Maybe culling overpopulation or smiting those that are truly evil. These people would be acting out of duty which would be falling into Kant’s Deontology. I would thank a serial killer for stopping someone who attempts to harm me or my loved ones and would in fact take pleasure in seeing someone with the intentions to hurt me harmed. That’s why John Mill’s ethical approach is more

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When he [Kant] begins to deduce from this precept [i.e. CI] any of the actual duties of morality, he fails, almost grotesquely, to show that there would be any contradiction, any logical (not to say physical) impossibility, in the adoption by all rational beings of the most outrageously immoral rules of conduct. All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur. Here Mill considers of consequences in moral action, as we will see, Mill’s consequentialism rather than Utilitarianism is the direct charge made to Kant, these two notions are not same, the utiitlirms principle is seek happiness and avoid pain, precisely moral action would be conducted on maximizing happiness and minimizing…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He thinks that having the capacity to formulate arguments leads to a more theoretical world. He states that practical reasoning is how one applies ethical fashion. I believe that in order to make an ethical choice about any given situation, I would absolutely choose the philosophical teachings of John Stuart Mill because happiness is the center of all things. Without ones highest form of self and ones own happiness, the world would be a different place and would fall into a negative state whereas if people were to think positively, it could improve society as we know…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holden Gilbertson Philosophy 101 Dr. Fletcher RAP Assignment Kant Vs. Mill Mill believe that the consequences of actions determine its moral worth. While Both Philosophers have a good argument on the process of making decisions. Mill believes in utilitarianism and thinks that actions are based off of happiness.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Mill

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethical Issues- Is it morally justifiable to kill one person to save three people? Would it make a difference if Parker had given consent? What if they all agreed to a Lottery? Summary of Philosophies of Mill and Kant- Mill believes in principle of utility. The right action or behavior for the greatest number of people.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A runaway trolley will kill five people if it stays on its current path. I have the option to pull a lever and divert the trolley to an alternate track. In this case, it will only kill one person. What should I do? This is the trolley problem, a classic thought experiment whose outcome has numerous applications.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It makes utilitarianism theory look like consequentialist. This causes Mill lacking attention on intentions behind actions. He believes that motivation of actions is insignificant for judging one’s morality. Results are more important and critical in Mill’s theory. And here the issue I have comes, how are people supposed to know what results their every action would cause before they do it?…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Philosophers Mill and Kant provide divergent views on morals and ethics. Mill 's philosophy of Utilitarianism and Kant 's philosophy of Categorical impartial are two examples. Kant’s philosophy is a theory that People should do the right thing, even if that produces more harm than doing the wrong thing. Mills philosophy is a theory that the action that makes the most overall happiness is what is morally…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He explains how to tell if something is done from duty or from a self-seeking purpose. Actions can be seen as good when they are done for duty only not inclination. The second proposition, he brings up how actions are not to just be attained, but in the maxim that is the reason for the action. The third proposition which Kant mentions is a consequence of the other two. This…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is out of the power of Mill’s ethical claim to capture whether or not the consequences of certain actions are to be acknowledged as good or bad. Solely centralizing on the power of an action’s outcomes is merely not enough to classify the act as just or unjust. Rather, by recognizing the importance of an action’s principle, or reason to determine its true moral worth; and therefore neglecting the ethics behind John Stuart Mill. Work…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He would argue that although your actions may cause more suffering in the end, your intentions were good and that is what mattered. Furthermore, he would support this because it supports his theory of the categorical imperative. Hypothetically, your maxim could be something along the lines of, "If an individual they have the ability to save a life, he or she should at least try because it 's his or her duty. " This is a maxim that can be universalized. Additionally, it acknowledges that the drowning child is an end and deserves to be saved.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill believes that he figured out a way to overcome the opportunity for immoral acts to take place. But even Mill’s distinction of the…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics