Immanuel Kant Legalization Of Drugs

Superior Essays
Legalization of the drug is one of the rising issues in the United States. There are some states in the United States, who have legalized drugs, which were once considered illegal in other states. Today, every individual has different views about the use and the legalization of illegal drugs. The behavior of an individual, not any affect him or her but also affects the people around them. Whereas, in the 21st century, everyone has the will to choose for themselves and everyone is well aware of the consequences of using drugs in their life.
As a matter of fact, Immanuel Kant is a German philosopher who accounts for the free will of the individual and giving the autonomy to an individual to choose for themselves. In his book, he has discussed
…show more content…
Negative freedom accounts for more individual choice and free will, for example, if we look into the above scenario of the man who wanted to use crack cocaine before going to the office. He is not concerned about the people around him, he is only concerned about his own happiness. In addition, the positive freedom accounts for both the individual freedom and for society. In positive freedom, the basic goods are shared in the society, to increase the empowerment and freedom in the society. Whereas, the individual has to be lower than the society, in this way it would promote the idea of socially independent society. For example, if someone decided to use drugs on a daily basis but, her friends and family warned them about the harmful effect she would have in her upcoming life because of the daily of drugs. In this case, firstly the person is well informed about the harmful effects, whereas the family or friends which are a trying to educate her is also her well-wishers. Even though a third party is coming in to inform you but they are helping you in living a better life for yourself and also helping you in restoring you into your normal life. This might affect an individual’s freedom, but it might also save them from using them to means to an …show more content…
Kant’s theory is very perfect, but when you live in a society with family, friends, and community you have to take care of their wishes you. You can’t always make the decision for your own self. Although, I agree every individual should be allowed to make decisions on their own basis sometimes we have to look for the greater good of the society. Especially on the sensitive topics like drug use, abortion or national security, the government has to look for the greater good of the people for the people of United States. In the philosophy of Kant, he is more concerned about the presence of the individual’s, whereas Mill talked about calculations and observations which accounts both for present and future

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One of the hottest topics that has been widely discussed lately is the “drug war”. A regular columnist and professor of economics at Samford University, Art Carden argues in his article Forbes, “Let’s Be Blunt: It’s Time to End the Drug War” for the end of the drug prohibition. The purpose of the article is to persuade the readers that the war on drugs has been a costly failure, causing unintended negative economic consequences. Overall, Carden’s argument is convincing because he offers a strong, clear thesis with persuasive logical evidences as supports.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug addictions and abuse are not solely an American problem. The drug problem is worldwide. Drug policies vary from country to country and are unique to their specific problems. Each country has developed its own policy in regards to illicit drug use, with varying degrees of tolerance and enforcement towards consumption-related behavior. (Gatto, 1999).…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the reading, “What is Freedom?” Isiah Berlin discusses the differences between two types of freedom, positive and negative freedoms. Positive Freedom defined by Berlin is not have inferred by any external forces or any circumstances. Negative Freedom is when someone doesn’t have freedom or not able to have freedom if you are not able to attain a goal. Positive Freedom is when someone wants to be their own master, they don’t any anyone to get in the way of achieving what they can and can’t do.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    (Call to action) With this new understanding of how drug legalization can benefit us, let’s please reconsider where we stand, so that we can make drug prohibition a thing of the past. ***Blank Slide*** Transition: There are many factors to take into consideration when discussing the issue of drug legalization so being educated on the topic is important. Conclusion: I. Restatement of proposition: Because of its potential tax revenue and its ability to create a safer environment, we should all re-evaluate where we stand on legalization of all drugs.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Satire On Drugs

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drug laws play a vital role in American society because drug use is an unfortunate part of the culture. Regardless of one’s views on whether some currently illegal drugs should be treated differently than others, the fact is that at this point all non-prescription drugs are illegal, and the government is responsible for responding to public outcry on this issue whether it be the legalization of recreational drugs like marijuana or the perceived injustices handed down to non-violent drug offenders. The serious nature of our country’s drug epidemic makes the topic of drug laws one that must be addressed by all branches of the US Government; the President is calling for legalization of recreational marijuana, congress is passing groundbreaking…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Satire On Drugs

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In our Nation, today the topic of the use and abuse of illegal drugs appears to be widespread. The United States is somewhat of at a crossroads in regard to its drug policy. Drug use, as well as abuse is prominent amongst our citizens ranging in different ages and classifications of people from children to adults, to the rich and the poor. Drugs do not discriminate whatsoever.…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The negative will now prove the treating of abuse of illigal drugs should be a matter of criminal justice because first of all the absense of punishment will lead to an idea of acceptance among drug users. Secondly, locking up drug abusers is an effective way to keep them from harming civilians. Thirdly, the only way a drug abuser can quit is only if they want help and want change themselves. This issue adresses not only the U.S but also the rest of the world…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both philosophers used a first principle to govern their ideas and both philosophers were interested in universality. Kant using his categorical imperative to universalize all to be ends within themselves, and Mill in considering consequences for all sentient creatures as well as the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. Also, they both took into account duties to others: the rules to not lie, and not deprive others. All in all both Mill and Kant were philosophers that both shared similarities and differences in their ideas of a kingdom of ends, for Kant, and an enlarged sense of Justice, for Mill, and with the above text this is…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freedom Vs Security

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    An individual cannot be free without engaging in the process of choice. Gutmann (1980 p10) also claimed “choice is a necessary, not a sufficient condition of individual freedom” The concept of freedom is classified into two types, which are: negative freedom and positive freedom. “Positive freedom” is freedom to control one’s life and do whatever you want. McHugh (2006) claimed that positive freedom is the view of freedom where there are non-restrictions of opinions whereas “Negative freedom” is freedom from external hindrance or interference that prevents you from doing what you want.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under no circumstances should drugs be legalized; drugs have negative consequences not only for individuals, but may also affect the entire families in numerous ways. For example, a parent or parents that abuses drugs is more likely to abuse and or neglected their children, these children often grow up and become substance abusers themselves. Authors like William Bennett are advocates for the legalization of drugs. Bennett who is the author of ‘’Should Drugs Be Legalized’’ meet with several prominent government personnel to discuss the war on drugs. It is Bennett’s view that these prominent government officials are in favor of the legalization of drugs.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The difference between negative and freedom is how much of a role the state effects. Support for negative freedom usually means people want a limited role for the state/government in their lives. A good example and part of the Canadian charter for this freedom would be freedom of speech, thought, and belief. However, positive freedom is the opposite and supporters agree that the state should have a role in a person's life for the sake of the common good and purpose. A good example of positive freedom would be universal health care or welfare, which would fall under equality and liberty rights.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument on whether drugs should be legalized has been going on for so long now. Some people say as an Americans we have the right to choose whether we want to do drugs or not. It is really hard to control the consumption of drugs, because people are going to do them whether they are legal or illegal. Other people say that the laws that are being enforced now are good to control drugs. “There will also be more unpublicized fatal and maiming crashes, more job accidents, more child neglect, more of everything associated with substance abuse”(M. Kendrecke).…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The drug market is stronger than ever, yet the drug war has been in full force for several decades. The effects here in the United States, are quite similar to the effects internationally, but there are many solutions other than a drug war, to stop the use of drugs. Nobel laureate and economist Milton Friedman remarked on the issue, “However much harm drugs do to those who use them…seeking to prohibit their use does even more harm both to users of drugs and to the rest of us…Legalizing drugs would simultaneously reduce the amount of crime and improve law enforcement. It is hard to conceive of any other single measure that would accomplish so much to promote law and order” (Donohue 146). Friedman is right.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays