Immanuel Kant On The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights

Superior Essays
Alexa Musselman
PHL 102:006
Analytical Paper #1
November 21, 2016
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is established on the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world. Each article is put into place to ensure human rights are protected for all people and nations. The United Nations and States vowed to obey the rights of the people. The claims that are made in the articles go hand in hand with several ethical terms. For example, Utilitarianism, The Categorical Imperative, Virtue Ethics, Social Contract Theory, Natural Law and Feminist Ethics.
According to Jeremy Bentham, Utilitarianism is about morality making the world as happy as possible, not about pleasing God (Rachels and Rachels 99).
…show more content…
“Act only according to that maxism by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” which is stated in The Element of Moral Philosophy by the Rachels (Rachels and Rachels). In other words do not do to others that you do not want done to you. For example the act of lying should not be done because it is not morally okay to do. Immanuel Kant saids that lying is “the obliteration of one’s dignity as a human being” (Rachels and Rachels). The second way Kant explains categorical imperative is “Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only” (Rachels and Rachels 139). An example from The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is article four which declares that no one is be to held in slavery. This is because slavery violates Kant principle to treat individuals as a …show more content…
Hobbes claims that does not depend on God, natural purposes, and selfish human. In our society we need moral rules in order to get benefits of social living. Jean Jacques Rousseau also had a say about the contract. He declares “we become different kinds of creatures when we enter civilized relations with others” (Rachels and Rachels 84). The contract is based on morality and government. Morality is to make social living possible; Government is to enforce vital moral rules. It is summarized by the Rachels by stating, “Morality consists in the set of rules, governing behavior, that rational people will accept, on the condition that others accept them as well” (Rachels and Rachels 85). The theory of the social contract is present in article four which proclaims that slavery is not tolerated under any

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On December 10, 1948 the Universal Declaration of Rights was formed, motivated by the experiences of previous World Wars. It was the first period in which countries across the world agreed on a comprehensive statement of human rights. Australia also played an influential role in the development of the Declaration. It begins by recognising that ‘the inherent dignity of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world’. The document declares that each of the rights are universal and can be shared and enjoyed by all people no matter their race or religion.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Contract And Popular Sovereignty The social contracts stems from individuals coming together to form a sort of agreement to, which is central in making a society. Not only form a society but to make it a better place. Law, State and the constitution are all by-products of society; here we see the stepping-stone from people being people, to it becoming sovereign. All theories conclude that people make this social contract for protection of their being and also their property.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abstract Human rights are rights that each single one of us has fair by the truth that we are people but it wasn't like that continuously. We didn't always have those rights. A part of time, battle and numerous battles had to pass for these rights to begin being recognized and regarded. In her speech, “The Struggle for Human Rights”, Eleanor Roosevelt uses many rhetorical devices to show how the United Nations is trying to enforce a Declaration to different countries to make sure people’s rights are not affected or lost.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the article “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (United nations) addresses the issues that the United Nations has had to conference on; such as, human…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gender Wage Gap In Canada

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Universal Declaration of human rights it states that everyone is entitled to the…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When first reading the experiment in regards to rescue I and rescues II, I did not like or want to make a choice, and really, I do not have to make a choice. My job is to tell you what Stuart Mill would do and what Immanuel Kant would do based on their philosophical views of utilitarianism and categorical imperatives respectfully. In Rescue I & II Mill. Utilitarianism is the basic principle to look at what is right and wrong. Depending on the consequences or the outcomes you can select the course of action not which is in your own best interest, but that which takes into account the best interest of others.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jai’lece McCracken Medical Law & Ethics Term Paper Should Sally be Sterilized Sally Smith is 26 years old and is disabled. Her aunt has gone to court to have the young woman sterilized. Smith opposes the sterilization, but a judge has decided that since Sally “would suffer irreparable psychological damage” if she had a child, she should be sterilized. Should Sally be allowed to have children?…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative is a moral obligation that is not dependent on the situation of individual, meaning there is a set rule for everyone. A Kantian would say that in order to do something, everyone else must also be allowed to do it. This means that if someone can lie, then everyone can lie, and if someone can steal then everyone can steal. A Kantian would add that if the situation in which you try to achieve your maxim is immoral, do not give up. Rather, you should find a different way in which to achieve the maxim.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism In Lying

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When a friend constantly tells me, I look “gorgeous and you’re not fat”. However, in reality, I am self-conscious and I gained a lot of weight. This is a lie, the reason she tells me this is because she wants to help boost my confidence and not hurt my feelings. She knows that I am self-conscious about my appearance. Nevertheless, hearing it constantly doesn’t help me, but makes me feel more self-conscious of my body and hurts my emotions.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their ideas on the state of nature, Hobbes has a negative view, while Rousseau believes we were better off in the state of nature. The basis for their different ideas on the state of nature contribute to their diverging ideas on their accounts of government by social contract. Hobbes argues for citizens relinquishing their authority to the state, while Rousseau contends for the sovereign authority to be in the hand of the citizens. I will argue that Rousseau makes a more convincing argument because it is one of compromise rather than extremism. Hobbes’ account of government by social contract is based on the basic principle and rational that people give up some of their rights in order to feel secure.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivie Eboigbodin Qualitative and Quantitative Pleasures Qualitative and Quantitative pleasures come out of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism can often be thought of as dangerous and wretched because it allows for seriously immoral acts to take place. Utilitarianism argues for maximum pleasure to take place, but in doing so can allow such acts as rape, torture etc. Therefore many disregard the act because of its possible immoral acts that could take place. However the Philosopher Mill has come up with two different levels of pleasure, qualitative and quantitative, to determine which acts are worth pursuing.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays