Immanuel Kant Analysis

Improved Essays
When is lying okay? Is it always acceptable? Is it never acceptable to ‘’commit a sin’’ as german philosopher? Immanuel Kant would refer to a lie as.Your standpoint may differ from mine.I in believe lying is only permitted,when it can be used to protect and care for others or yourself.

No one wants to hurt a friends feelings.The U.S. Political Campaign:Lies,Lies,Lies Excerpt feels the same.They call this type of lie the ‘’I love your dress’’ lie.It’s what the person(friend)who is being lied to wants.Also the people who wrote the excerpt believe that “most “little white lies” belong here,well-intentioned deceptions to grease the gears of society.”

Another group of people who conquer with me are the people who took the poll for It’s the Truth:Americans Conflicted About Lying.Randy Cohen believes that “not only is lying justified, it is sometimes a moral duty.’’For instance, you have cancer but your partner/spouse or family doesn’t know.Then they ask ‘’how are you.’’ What do you do?You lie.Why.It’s to protect the people around you from anxiety.
…show more content…
So when is lying justified?It is admitible to be a so called “liar,liar,pants on fire.”Only to guard oneself or others.Other than that everyone should try to be as honest as possible…..unless you know.Well I’m pretty sure you’ll know when the time is

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    On a grand scale, lying is typically associated with being negative but sometimes lying is used in our daily lives to be more moral e.g. telling white lies to make someone feel better. Kant would still rule these out as in his view all lying is wrong. Benjamin Constant put forward the question of the inquiring murderer at the door. If a murderer came to your door asking you for the whereabouts of your friend (whom you know is upstairs) in order to kill them.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Lying” How would you know whether lying is okay or not okay? There are many terms of lying for example, lies to protect others, lies in the interest of that liar, and lies to cause harm. Even Americans conflict about lying that means they're confused about lying or not. Like Blanton’s opinion is just too simple to tell the truth. I question whether to lie or not to lie, I picked that lying is okay because sometimes you have to lie in order to not cause any harms way.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the matter of deception, it is the loss of choice that hinders the deceived. One only wishes to be lied to only if it serves some sort of benefit as we may wish to be lied to but prefer to choose when that would happen. Such alternatives should be chosen and not “imposed by lies or other forms of manipulation.” “The perspective of the deceived is shared by all those who feel the consequences of a lie, whether or not they are themselves lied to” (21). Regardless of who is deceived, everyone experiences similar ramifications after being lied to, and when one wish to lie, there should be no negative ulterior motives. Skepticism denies the possibility of knowledge as determinism denies the possibility of freedom, yet both knowledge and freedom are required to act in making a rational choice (21).…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant believes that every person has rights and their own autonomy, so lying to them is treating them as a mere thing. There is no valid reason to lie about this action other than the fact Pat most likely regrets it, and fears losing Chris. Therefore, this maxim cannot be applied as a universal law, because it is rationally incoherent to make a maxim a law that is based off of self-interest. Since it cannot be applied universally, and telling Chris the truth would have greater moral worth, it is concluded that according to Kant’s Categorical Imperative Pat should tell Chris that she cheated out of respect and to follow her duty to him as his significant…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantian Ethics Case Study

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The ethics of a system that is founded, and relies on a ‘lie’ seems at first glance a kind of breach of human right to live freely without deception. Naturally the ‘noble lie’ is indeed a form of lie, a falsity. Kantian ethics would of course dictate that one should never lie as the act of lying, whatever the intentions or outcomes, is wrong on the basis that telling the truth is a moral duty. Socrates’ defence splits lies into two categories (382a4-5, 382C3-4) – ‘verbal lies’, or lies in speech (which can be useful and/or good) and ‘real lies’ (lies that create ‘error in the psyche’, which are never useful, or good). He claims that the noble lie only ever utilises ‘verbal lies’, and as such are beneficial for the Republic.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, Lying is sometimes justified since all lies have a cost to the lair. Some people say “yes, but we shouldn’t manipulate the truth, but I disagree because you can lose a person that you will need in life. For example, Cohen says…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people prefer the truth, but most people also do not like for people to ruin their day by telling them their honest opinion. A lie is only a lie if what they are telling you is false. Friedrich Nietzsche said in Morality as Anti-Nature “truth is confused with the effects of believing something to be true” (355). It can be argued that a lie is justified if the person telling the lie believes it to be the truth. Ericsson believes that lying is immoral, but everyone does it.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant would find no fault in this. Telling the truth is part of the categorical imperative, so honesty is compulsory. Moreover, Kant would place no blame on the man for telling the truth. It is not his fault that the other man is a murder, and he is acting from duty, the most morally correct course of action. Utilitarians would have some substantial critiques for Kantians, calling their morality too ridged.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant requests for people to pursue their duty because it is their duty. “Act of that maxim which can at the same time have for its object itself as a universal law of nature” (Perry 533). Kant is stating that if you are the only person that can complete the task or duty then you should not do it. He does not want us doing things like committing suicide because that is not consider a good duty and he does not want people doing things that cannot be consist of as a universal duty. Kant wants us to realize that we should only complete a task or duty if we approve that other people can do it as well.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone asked a friend to loan them some money but knew they could not ever repay their friend, is it ethical to make a personal exemption? Kant says no. To be moral, one cannot make special exceptions for themselves regarding ethical issues. If everyone, in this instance, made the same false promise, no one would ever lend anyone any money. The second component of the test is whether or not actions are respectful to other people.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays