Immanuel Kant Against Euthanasia

Improved Essays
Between the debates of those who support or are against euthanasia, the philosopher Immanuel Kant is recognized as the thinker who came up with the foundation of the philosophical idea and perspective known as Deontological ethics. According to Odianosen, “Kant viewed the ability of human beings to reason as the basis of our status as moral agents. For an action to have moral worth, for it to reflect a good will, the action must be undertaken for duty’s sake- and not for some other reason, such as fear of being caught or punished” (Odianosen, 2012). For those are argue in in support of euthanasia, some say that it allows other people who are suffering from the pain of being considered to have the status of terminal. “It also allows a terminally

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many wonder if euthanasia is right and moral and if it is not what should be done when being faced with this situation. I think the best way to look at physician-assisted euthanasia is through consequentialism and deontology. It’s important we look at the consequences of physician-assisted suicide because they are literally the difference between life and death. A patient that is gravely ill or in a coma may be diagnosed and given a time limit until death, however, some patients have surprised their doctors.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Case Against Euthanasia

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Bill of Rights is a name for the first ten amendments of the Constitution of the United States guaranteeing rights of American citizens. The House of Representatives had already approved of the Bill of Rights on September 24 1789. This decision was considered extremely controversial as it went against the anti-federalists will, assuring their fear that the federal government would be granted superabundant power which in turn would deprive the people of certain liberties. This resulted in the U.S. Supreme Court mandating that the state governments accept and protect the liberties stated in The Bill of Rights. It was ratified by certain states on December 15, 1791 and officially went into effect on March 1, 1792.…

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many different of points of view when it comes to the topic and discussion of euthanasia. Euthanasia is the ‘mercy killing’ of someone in order to relieve some type of great pain or suffering. (White 148) Conducting my opinion on this topic was rather difficult, because there are many different circumstances to consider when arguing for or against euthanasia. I agree completely with the idea of Voluntary Euthanasia, which is the mercy killing of someone with their consent.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When discussing a topic as dubious as Euthanasia, identifying and involving the righteous, upmost important stakeholders, ensures focus remains on the people that are affected by the issue. When addressing viewpoints of the stakeholders from which the whole issue surrounds, the potential Euthanasia user who is terminally ill should be acknowledged as the primary stakeholder as they have the most interest because this issue directly affects them. Terminal illness is defined as a disease that cannot be cured, reasonably expected to result in the death of the patient. The right to personal autonomy has been recognized in law as a basic right of every human being. A majority of terminally ill patients are advocates of Euthanasia, who wish the treatment…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the sake of time, I will consider PAS and euthanasia as essentially the same practice. Thus these terms will be used interchangeably, except in citations, which will always use the term stated by the source. I will also avoid the moral or religious arguments against these practices, not because they are invalid, but because the inclusion of such arguments would lengthen this speech beyond the imposed limits. Instead I will argue that legalizing euthanasia, even if initially for a good purpose, leads to severe ethical consequences. These consequences can be summarized as the danger to doctors, the danger to patients, and the danger to…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia Be Legalized

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    People who are suffering and essentially at death’s doorstep should have the power to choose and should not have to fight for their right against a group of people’s individual beliefs. Many also argue the euthanasia should be illegal because it will eventually lead to a slope of people who will take advantage of it. Euthanasia has been granted to patients with diseases such as Alzheimer 's and depression which are purely mental, non painful disorders which should not qualify. The power to inflict death will only lead to a negative effect on society. Even though some disorders are not physically painful does not mean they do not cause mental suffering.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think voluntary active euthanasia should be a choice for the terminally ill? Active euthanasia is one of the heaviest debatable topics when speaking on the issues that pertain to end of life care for many reasons with individuals from all different types of careers and settings leading up to new details to either support or disagree this operation. One of the main topics in this debate is whether a patient with a disability is able to make the decision to end their life while in a normal state of mind(parenethical, 2011). In this essay, I will be concentrating on active euthanasia and how it relates to the utilitarian theory. First, we need to take a view at what exactly the utilitarian theory consists of.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some consider euthanasia to be indecent and others say that it is murder. Euthanasia should be legalized in light of the fact that it gives an opportunity to diminish agony, conveys alleviation to a person…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    After examining all the relevant argument surrounding this topic, it was easy to formulate an opinion supporting voluntary euthanasia in limited circumstances. The contemporary thinker, Peter Singer provides a sound argument that outlines how voluntary euthanasia keeps with the ultimate objective of healthcare. When debating the morality of voluntary euthanasia, it is important to consider why it is morally impermissible to kill a human being. According to Singer, the fact that killing is considered wrong simply because a being is human is not a strong enough reason for it to morally wrong in all situations. This idea that human life is intrinsically valuable stems from religious ideals and is commonly defended using deontology (Singer, “Voluntary” 528).…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is a serious issue in today’s society. Euthanasia is the act of relieving someone of his or her suffering by intentionally ending his or her life. Many people argue that euthanasia is beneficial to the person suffering as well as his or her family. On the other hand, many people argue that euthanasia is morally wrong. Overall, euthanasia is not beneficial to anyone, and the practice should be stopped for good.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical philosophers such as Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill, describe three separate moral beliefs that each propose a different view on an individual’s right to autonomy. Aristotle was against euthanasia, due to his theory of virtue ethics and aiming to achieve morally correctness. Immanuel Kant was not concerned with consequences, but rather intentions. If euthanasia was an ethical response, then it would be regarded as a good act. John Stuart Mill supported euthanasia, for his ethical theory dictates that so long as an action is not causing harm to anyone else, it is admissible.…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human Dignity Analysis

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    the various connotations Attached to the term “dignity” as situated along a continuum. One end of the continuum represents the moral and the other the aesthetic. Basic dignity as desenbed above, falls clearly toward the moral end of this continuum. This the term carries connotations of something objective and absolute. Although moral notions are not nearly as objective and absolute as some might think or hope, they bear a certain objective quality that enables them to serve as a basis of social norms and policies.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A deontologist will also would also make a choice based on the fourth duty based theory and look at each duty and make a choice based several of the theory (Fieser, n.d.). The final ethical dilemma that surrounds euthanasia is based on what a virtue theory philosopher would do in this situation. A virtue theory philosopher will handle the ethical dilemma by making a decision if doing this is based on good character or not doing is a form of cowardice. Virtue theory include four virtues that include wisdom, temperance and justice, which is referred to has cardinal virtue. Virtue theory philosopher would use the trait of fortitude to handle this situations (Fieser, n.d.).…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays