As an individual who is thinking about whistleblowing, there might be costs which he needs to be introduced that he will incur in future if he/she decides to go ahead with the whistleblowing, professional body should advise the individual regarding the advantages and the disadvantages of whistleblowing. After analysing all the discussion which I stated above I think the professional body should advice the individual to analyse both side of discussion and then let the individual decide if he/she wants to go ahead. There could be different situation with each and every one there could no generic answer given to everyone on the name of ethics. Yes, ethics is important but the situation could be demanding something. If an individual is coming from lees financially stable background and is the only person in
…show more content…
This is the reality truth that no one at that level of employment wants to risk their bread and butter for something that is ethically not correct and should be reported. The article (Sampson, 2013) suggests “usually whistleblowers are ambitious individuals clamouring for attention and glory” but on the other hand whistleblowing can make an important contribution and more and more people volunteer to do this the better it will get for the community. And that should be advised to the individuals who are thinking about
This is the reality truth that no one at that level of employment wants to risk their bread and butter for something that is ethically not correct and should be reported. The article (Sampson, 2013) suggests “usually whistleblowers are ambitious individuals clamouring for attention and glory” but on the other hand whistleblowing can make an important contribution and more and more people volunteer to do this the better it will get for the community. And that should be advised to the individuals who are thinking about