Illinois Vs. Wardlow Case Study

Improved Essays
The case of Illinois vs. Wardlow (cited as 528 U.S. 119 (2000) ) opened the question: “May walking away, in order to avoid contact with a police officer, is a suspicious behavior enough to satisfy the constitutional definition of the reasonable suspicion ?” Constitution has provided the following test for reasonable suspicion: The officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts that, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, provide a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the detainee of criminal activity. (Kanovitz, Constitutional Law,107) . The facts of the case: On September 9, 1995, Officers Nolan and Harvey were working in the special operation area of the Chicago. Been known as a criminal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case of Illinois v. Wardlow, Sam Wardlow, a 44-year old black man was wrongly searched after he was apparently seen acting ‘suspicious’ when he ran after he saw four police cars driving up. He was then chased by Timothy Nolan, a veteran police officer, as he believed Wardlow as guilty. The officers believed him to be in a ‘high crime area’. They caught up to Wardlow and frisked him. During the search, they found a handgun.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. In your opinion, please discuss the “pros and cons” of the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan. (Please include the advantages and/or disadvantages of partisan judicial elections and whether, in your opinion, is a better system for choosing state judges. When talking about a state judge selection, the best way to elect a judge is by the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan. But there are many pros and cons to each side of this choice!…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Brief # 3 Fernanda Sbordone LEG110 12/5/2016 Instructor: Ms. Roland Arizona v. Evans Citation. 514 US 1 (1995)DOCKET NO . 93-1660 .Arizona Supreme Court.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment Two: State Court Survey In Arizona, the majority of cities and towns have a municipal court which is sometimes also called city or magistrate court. This court hears misdemeanor and petty offense violations within their town or city. City or town magistrates preside over some criminal and civil traffic cases. Criminal traffic cases with no serious injuries and civil traffic cases that involve violations of city ordinances. They have the ability to issue Orders of Protection and search warrants.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State V. Evans Case Study

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of State v. Evans, 671 N.W.2d 720, (2003). , we see the distress of the victim that suffered from both harassment and stalking from her predator for a period that span more than three years (Brody and Acker, 2010). The harassment aspect that Hubert Evans summited the victim, Rebecca Arnold, to started out at a very slow rate with it become more intense and leading to stalking over years leading to the arrest of Mr. Evans and criminal conviction for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010). The criminal charges were heard by a judge and jury where Mr. Evans gained a criminal conviction for the charges that he faced in the trial. The criminal conviction of Mr. Evans lead to his appeal to the State of Iowa Appeals court to evaluate the case as it relates to the state statute for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010).…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise included 3 provision the first one was Maine was admitted as a free state. The Second provision was that Missouri was admitted as a slave state, and the third provision was slavery would not be allowed in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase north of the 36 30 line. Thomas Jefferson referred to the Missouri Compromise as a " firebell in the night" because slavery excluded from the territories north of 36º30'. Jefferson was worried that slavery in Missouri, and disagreements over states' rights and other volatile issues would lead to civil war. Jefferson disapproved deeply of slavery, but more strongly disapproved of any action on the part of Congress that exceeded constitutional authority, he felt slavery would die a natural…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Indiana's attorney general, I have legal obligations as the lawyer to state government that do not permit me to provide specific legal analysis or advice to the public, but only to my government clients. But I want to reassure all Hoosiers that our Constitution provides strong protections for both religious liberties and protections against discrimination. The current issues involving state statutes can in no way lessen any constitutional rights. But in addition to being the state government's attorney, I am a lifelong Hoosier who loves this state.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, the Tinkers were suing because they believed that their school violated their first amendment right to freedom of speech. This case was decided in 1969 under the Warren Court with a 7-2 decision. Three of the Tinker children and one of their friends wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. Just before the children did this, the school made a rule against protesting the Vietnam War. When the children went to school with the black armbands on, they were suspended.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of the article is to address the ethical implications of a legal case against the counseling profession by Ward -vs-Wilbanks. Ms. Ward was a graduate student enrolled at EMU in the clinical counseling program during her practicum. During such time, Ms. Ward refused to render services to a client because of her values and religious beliefs; therefore she referred the client to another student. The ACA standard prohibits such practice especially when the counselor’s values are inconsistence with the client’s goals or are discriminatory in nature as this case was. This conflict became evident when Ms. Ward was suspended from the program indefinitely.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling, which occurred during the Vietnam War, granted the students the right to express their political opinions as long as they did not disrupt the classroom. Their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights could not be restricted based on a “general fear of disruption,” which is what the administration argued. According to Justice Fortas, who wrote the majority opinion, the protest was a “silent, passive expression of opinion.” Though a few hostile comments had been made to the students who were wearing armbands, there had been no threats or acts of violence. Also, there had not been any findings that the armbands would substantially interfere with school operations or more importantly, harm the rights of other students.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the public safety exception, where officers engage in a custodial interrogation before Miranda warnings, and if reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety or the safety of the arresting officers, a suspect’s statements are admissible as evidence. (New York v. Quarles (1984) 476 U.S. 656 (holding that the need for answers to questions in a situation posing a threat to the public safety outweighs the need for the prophylactic rule protecting the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination).) In essence, an officer must have a reasonable need to protect the public or themselves from immediate danger. Id. Moreover, the applicability of the public safety exception is not dependent upon the subjective motivation of the questioning officer.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evan Miller has had a rough upbringing. He has had emotional abandonment from his alcoholic and drug abused mother, his abusive father and forced to be placed in multiple foster cares throughout his childhood. Miller is a prime example of an abandoned, troubled minor, whose true destiny has been destroyed due to these circumstances. The problems he has faced steered him to being depressed and unsatisfied, using drugs, alcohol and four suicide attempts to trying and fulfill the emptiness he has been feeling his entire life.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ohio, reasonable suspicion, and the actions allowed on its basis are all interesting concepts that the court has their rationale for backing. Reasonable suspicion is more abstract because it doesn’t only take the police officers experience to prove suspicion. Some of the developments that allow officers to use reasonable suspicion are traffic sops and protective sweeps. Terry like stops based on reasonable suspicion have even created profiles such as, drug courier profiles where they try to focus on certain behaviors exhibited based on the behaviors and patterns from past drug couriers. The Courts attempt to give guidelines for what is permissible under reasonable suspicion, yet it looks like from cases like Reid, that they have avoided touching matters that may be to controversial or at least making it set and stone.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Stop and frisk tactics have been used to preserve public safety and officer well-being. A stop and frisk is a non-intrusive police stop and pat-down based on the reasonable suspicion in relation to a crime that has happened, will happen, or is in the process of being carried out (Cornell Law School, 2017). Stop and frisk situations are highly common and the reported instances have increased by approximately 7% annually (Hovhannisyan, 2006). However, the approach is highly controversial because it operates primarily on officers' perceptions and opinions, which opens the door to personal prejudices dictating the usage. This executive summary includes the advantages and disadvantages involved in stop and frisk procedures as well as the constitutionality and recommendations to improve the approach.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays