Imagine having a really bad life somewhere in the world and coming to the United States. Only for you to need certification or be sent back. Does that sound fair?
So if people come to America to improve their lives, why is there so much hassle and debate? Even if we let them in, we threaten to deport them. Is this just small minded bigotry or actual concern? In my opinion, it’s the first option. Immigration needs certification and must be regulated because people are concerned about the well being of our country or they are just paranoid.
One reason for people to be skeptical of immigration could be because they are still concerned about the 9/11 attacks in 2001. One article I found contained a point of view on how the U.S. should follow real ID law. The article says that because we didn’t have the real ID law, the hijackers that stole the planes had a much easier time of doing so. The article also states that the terrorists have had 16 state’s driver’s licenses and 14 state ID cards issued to them to make their work easier. The article also says that the Federal Government has not been too …show more content…
Such as why the people on each end feel the way they do. It says that National Identification cards that exist around the world, fight terrorism and curb illegal immigration. It says that some countries have it for increased national security to avoid problems. In the United States, there has been a renewed interest in the adoption of national ID cards following the 2001 terrorist attacks. So clearly, people think that if we had better security, problems like that could be avoided. Congress passed the Real ID Act in 2005 and claim it would make borders more secure. Some believe it’s a violation of privacy rights. Some countries have removed their National ID cards due to criticism. I think it’s safe to say that this is a pretty split world-wide issue about whether or not immigration should be regulated or
So if people come to America to improve their lives, why is there so much hassle and debate? Even if we let them in, we threaten to deport them. Is this just small minded bigotry or actual concern? In my opinion, it’s the first option. Immigration needs certification and must be regulated because people are concerned about the well being of our country or they are just paranoid.
One reason for people to be skeptical of immigration could be because they are still concerned about the 9/11 attacks in 2001. One article I found contained a point of view on how the U.S. should follow real ID law. The article says that because we didn’t have the real ID law, the hijackers that stole the planes had a much easier time of doing so. The article also states that the terrorists have had 16 state’s driver’s licenses and 14 state ID cards issued to them to make their work easier. The article also says that the Federal Government has not been too …show more content…
Such as why the people on each end feel the way they do. It says that National Identification cards that exist around the world, fight terrorism and curb illegal immigration. It says that some countries have it for increased national security to avoid problems. In the United States, there has been a renewed interest in the adoption of national ID cards following the 2001 terrorist attacks. So clearly, people think that if we had better security, problems like that could be avoided. Congress passed the Real ID Act in 2005 and claim it would make borders more secure. Some believe it’s a violation of privacy rights. Some countries have removed their National ID cards due to criticism. I think it’s safe to say that this is a pretty split world-wide issue about whether or not immigration should be regulated or