John Hick Problem Of Evil Essay

Great Essays
For generations upon generations people around the world have asked the question, “If god is good, why is there evil in the world?”. On first observation of this simple question one sees what seems to be a fundamental flaw in the Christian belief. John Hick attempts to solve this life- changing question and prove that it has no effect on the essential belief of God. He defines this “Problem of Evil” in the following dilemma: “If God is perfectly loving, he must wish to abolish evil; and if he is all- powerful, he must be able to abolish evil. But if evil exists; therefore God cannot be both omnipotent and perfectly loving” (Hick 1). In going about proving the instability in what seems to be an ironclad argument, John Hick looks at multiple …show more content…
To solve the problem of moral evil, John Hick argues that in order for God to have created the human entity he had to create him with the capacity for freewill. If he had not done so, a person would no longer carry his or her identity as a person. In response to the argument of God creating a free person who would always make the right decision, Hick argues that the contradiction in itself does not make sense despite the apparent logic. In order for something to be free it must be free of any causation by an outside source. There cannot be any choice out of reach or not allowed. There cannot be a guarantee that anything will happen in any situation. Arguably there cannot be a guarantee of anything at all. The idea of a guarantee to make the right decision would fall under a situational basis and Hick compares this idea to a hypnotist who would take away one’s freewill and put you under the influence of his or her will. Hick goes as far to say that the idea of a person acting freely but always choosing the right thing is ultimately a “ ‘meaningless conjunction of words’- in this case ‘a person who is not a person’ ” (Hick 2) because the phrase in itself is not logically possible. As Hick accurately puts it, “The origin of moral evil lies forever concealed within the mystery of human freedom” (Hick …show more content…
This assumption is very reasonable. If god is omnipotent, omniscient he must have control of everything in the universe and if he wanted to change something he could with no difficulty. He would not be going against human will by choosing not to let the sun blow up. Nevertheless here’s the first area where Hick’s solution beats Clarke’s story of injustice. John Hick’s essay says that in order to live out “soul-making” one must live in a world of laws of physics and science. A world where there are consequences for our actions. The laws of science tell us that everything must end. That entropy is constantly putting the world into a more severe state of disorder and therefore nothing under our laws of reality can be eternal. So the destruction of the star was eminent. God maybe could have delayed it but ultimately eventually since it lays within our realm of reality it would have to “die” or implode. Also keep in mind the universe is constantly getting bigger and one day according to scientific belief it will snap backwards and the universe will end and we will all instanteously die. Our world like that of the inhabitants of the star will

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This is why similar events continue to happen and the opportunities for soul-making progress continues to present itself. Although one example of each moral value would be sufficient to repeat tragedies, is a flawed tactic and if God is omnipotent, as in all powerful and all knowing, then this wouldn’t happen and there would be a perfected method without flaw for soul-making progress, and this method would consist of only necessary scenarios that enable soul making. Hick’s soul-making theodicy of soul-making is flawed as it requires an omnipotent God, which it appears that God is not omnipotent as there is unnecessary evil in the world. Based on Paragraphs 2-3, the idea of evil being necessary for soul-making is redundant and must form a loop of necessary events in order for it to be true.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Australian philosopher named John L. Mackie is widely known for his argument against the problem of evil. Mackie’s argument was very similar to the problem of evil. The problem of evil in summary states that a God cannot exist with the existence of evil, but Mackie’s argument was not that God did not exist entirely, but rather that God did not exist as an all-powerful or perfect God. He argued that having an all knowing God, and the present existence of evil were both logically inconsistent. Mackie thought that if you could say one of those statements was false, then you could still believe in God’s existence.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    , pg. 102). If God were to be omniscient He should know when He creates a situation that it could lead to an unfortunate result. Because of this, Weirob believes that God is responsible for all actions. Weirob’s response to the argument about freedom includes a series of statements. First, God is omniscient.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Augustine And Evil

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Epicurus was one of the first philosophers to consider the problem of evil and his question; “if He is both willing and able (to take away all evils), which alone is suitable to God, from what source then are evils? Or why does He not remove them?” , summarises concisely the issue which has been at the forefront of philosophical argument for thousands of years. To explore this question I will first consider what God is. In this essay I will refer to God in the orthodox monotheistic sense of the word as an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent being. Likewise, evil refers to all that is bad in the world.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I then will argue against his beliefs and explain in depth why I believe that his premise is wrong. First, I will focus on the first premise: “There exist instances of intense suffering which an omnipotent, omniscient being could have prevented without thereby…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julian's Theory Of Evil

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The problem of evil is an atheistic argument, against the existence of God. It is a deductive argument that pits the existence of unjustified evil against the existence of any kind of divine being. Julian of Norwich presents a response to the problem of evil, but there are also some possible holes in Julian’s theory. This paper explores the problem of evil and how it is connected to human suffering, Julian’s theory in response to the problem, and a critique of Julian’s theory. One must assume that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God exists.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then God would be able to do anything. It would just be beyond our scope of comprehension. The fifth premise touches on God’s omnibenevolence. It states that if God is omnibenevolent, then God will eliminate as much evil as God can. On the surface, this premise seems to be sound.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What makes the good pure and evil bad? You are just about to find that out. We shall find the basis supporting this argument on the researches of three scholars who conducted an in-depth analysis on the subject. Each of these authors has their different contributions which must be not be ignored, to understand the existence of man in the universe, and things that control him. We shall look at the works of three researchers, who are Bertrand Russell, in his contributions on why I am Not a Christian, Mere Christianity by C.S Lewis, and finally, The Age of A reason.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discusses the Problem of Evil for theism, as well as defences theists have come up with against the problem. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: I shall argue that there is a possibility that God could have made different types of evils…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discuss the Problem of Evil for theism. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: God and evil can coexist because God may have reasons for evil existing, the main reason being to allow humans to have free will.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Simon Blackburn’s “Think”, Blackburn argues whether an all good, all knowing, and all powerful entity does exist. I focused on the argument Blackburn posed on Chapter 5, “God”. Blackburn is wrong to claim that the existence of evil suggests an entity who is all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful does not exist. Simon Blackburn discusses that there is no actual truth to religion since there is no concrete proof that there is even a God. Blackburn brings up the fact that it is not possible for an all good, all knowing, and all powerful to exist.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first idea we face, is the logical problem of evil. What this questions is the possibility of there being an omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omnipresent God and why evil still exists. One of the arguments made is, there is a God who is omnibenevolent and supposedly all good eliminates evil as far as it can, but we still have evil existing when there’s a God. By stating all of these, we have to give up one of the statements in order to make the argument true. The one fact that we can more than likely give up, is all good eliminates evil as far as it can.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays