Pros And Cons Of Neo-Liberalism

1423 Words 6 Pages
The largest events and processes in the international life of the twentieth and beginning of the twenty first century, such as the formation of the United Nations; the development of integration processes in Europe, America and Asia; the growth of economic, political and cultural globalization; led to the strengthening of the influence of international relations, the development of world politics and the manifestation of global processes in the life of every society and every person. Moreover, the development of international studies equips the researchers with an understanding of the meaning of all those events that are taking their place in the world, hence, anticipating the further evolution. Meanwhile, international relations remain a sphere …show more content…
It is considered possible to create effective collective security systems within the international system. This is facilitated by economic cooperation and the growing interdependence of states. In such a way, the liberals think that the state must rely on moral principles, avoiding the traditional policy of force and orientation toward different coalitions. Supporters of the liberal paradigm offer to overcome anarchy and violence by concerted political actions.
To continue, it should be stated that neo-liberalism differs significantly from the canonical liberal-idealistic paradigm. Its main characteristic is the recognition of the need for partial state participation in the regulation of socio-economic processes. This is the main difference between neo-liberalism and classical liberalism, which proclaimed the principle of total non-interference of the state in the socio-economic life of society. Neo-liberals, therefore, consider international cooperation not only possible, but also necessary for achieving stability, social progress and world

Related Documents