Ambiguity Of Scots Law Essay

Improved Essays
here are two recognised standards of proof in Scots law. The first is beyond reasonable doubt, which is usually in criminal cases. The second is on the balance of probabilities which arises mostly in the civil context. This would suggest that the law on the standard of proof is straightforward. However ambiguity arises in the argument that there is or that there should be a third standard. Another important complication to this area of the law arises when considering civil circumstances that may result in criminal sanctions. This is something that will also be considered in detail throughout this essay, and would cause me to argue that the law in this area is not clear and straightforward.

In criminal cases the crown must prove the accused committed offence beyond reasonable doubt. In some cases there is a persuasive burden on accused, this discharged by proof on the balance of probabilities. This is the first demonstration of the crossover between the two standards that aim to be distinct and clear. This is shown in HM Advocate v Mitchell .

The matter is more meaty in the discussion of the standard that applies to civil matters. A party on whom lies
…show more content…
The rule in all civil actions the standard of proof required is always the balance of probabilities. However, some cases have created ambiguity by suggesting that where there is an element of criminal activity. This can require a higher quality of evidence to tip the balance. Despite authority that firmly rejects the notion of an intermediate standard, there is a body of case law that implies where criminal behaviour is averred the Standard of proof is of a different quality if it is to succeed. Judicial dicta contribute to this ambiguity creating the perception of an intermediate standard. In Lennon, Lord Kincraig

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Burden Of Proof Essay

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The burden of proof when it comes to the criminal justice system is different for both civil and criminal cases. For a civil case the burden of proof is the preponderance of the evidence, while in a criminal case the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. It is fair to say that the civil law’s level of intentionality and burdens is easier to prove than the criminal case. With a criminal case, the prosecutors must meet to get a conviction. In a criminal case the defendant is innocent until proven guilty.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conflicts as property is an initially perplexing notion. Published in a 1977 issue of The British Journal of Criminology, “Conflicts as Property” is an article criticising industrialised legal criminal systems and proposing a new, reformed system. Nils Christie suggests that conflicts are entities that are taken from their rightful owners. He later describes a hypothetical legal system where “professional thievery” of conflicts is nonexistent. By use of an analogy and several sub-ideas he deconstructs the concept.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polarising the nation, The Queen v Baden-Clay case demonstrates the extent to which the Australian media can adversely affect the success of legal proceedings. The Australian adversarial system enforces strict rules of procedure, which are imperative to achieve equality and adequate protection in society. Although it is deemed effective, imperfections are evident (Skwirk Online Education, Nd). The Gerald Baden-Clay case highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the criminal justice system through the efficiency of the standard of evidence, rights of the accused, precedent and appeal used within the relentless trial to prove an accused murderer guilty.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People make decisions on the basis of circumstantial evidence in the everyday affairs of life. Nonetheless, the sources that stated the court…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The critical implications of the decision of Haque & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1765 (2 July 2015) in terms of the binding nature of opinions of Medical Officers of the Commonwealth (“MOC”) appointed by the Minister, are as it is stated in regulation 2.25A of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) the (“Regulations”). In that the opinion of the MOC is to be taken as to be correct in determining whether a person meets the requirements of Public Interest Criteria (“PIC”) 4005. The delegate of the Minister is not to form their own opinion on whether or not an applicant meets the requirements of PIC 4005.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mavis Baker Case Summary

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analyzing a case through a different perspective not only furthers the understanding of that theoretical perspective, but provides a refreshing outlook on the legal principles of the…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Although criminal justice requires the correct label to be attached to the defendant’s misconduct, the wide scope of behaviour covered by the Homicide Act 1957 often results in the unfair, and thus harsh, labelling of offenders. This essay will sought to prove that the law of homicide is often too harsh in its assignation of labels to those who cause the death of others, by concentrating on the examples of murder with oblique intent, involuntary manslaughter and the partial defence of infanticide. It will conclude by determining the extent to which the existing law assigns the correct labels to those who commit a homicide, and whether there is thus a need for reform within the law.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The crux of this case hinges on the construction of the provision of the HCGPP that, between 2007 and the spring of 2013, provided: A Police Services Supervisor I who is called in to work hours which are not contiguous to their regular shift shall receive a minimum of 4 hours pay at the overtime rate. The HCGPP is promulgated and revised by the Personnel Officer and enacted upon a vote of the County Council pursuant to Article VII, § 706 of the Howard County Charter. Although the HCGPP is a hybrid between a local government ordinance and an administrative regulation, “[w]hen we construe an agency’s rule or regulation, ‘the principles governing our interpretation of a statute apply.’” Hranicka v. Chesapeake Surgical, Ltd., 443 Md. 289, 298 (2015) (quoting Christopher, supra, 381 Md. at 209). Accordingly, as we set out to construe the HCGPP, our analysis begins by…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    IV. For Nullification Based on the tacit allowance of jury nullification that is present today, and the stated allowance of it in death penalty cases, jury nullification should be brought out of the darkness and instated as a right in trials. The benefits of jury nullification are clear, and include the fact that juries can respond to unanticipated circumstances in the moment that laws cannot and that they can look at exigent circumstances and choose to grant a defendant freedom when those circumstances are clear. There are three main ways that nullification should be made known and legal.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Importance Of Duty Of Care

    • 4284 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Last accessed 8th April 2013 HRCR. (1981). Young, James & Webster v. United Kingdom, 44 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser.…

    • 4284 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Societal values, norms and mores have always been an influencing factor when defining crime and deviancy. However, the definitions of certain crimes have stayed more or less constant. For example, murder has always been considered unlawful and wrong but in the late 20th century, certain types of murder that were once considered justifiable, gained inexcusable status. The question is why? What had changed?…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, judgments can be biased and too varied in cases that appear to share similar magnitude due to variations in judge perceptions. In this paper, I take the stand that the Irish judicial system allows for wide discretion that hurts the delivery of criminal justice in the…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1833 Factory Act Essay

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    His detailed investigations reach many logical inferences, particularly about magistrates’ leniency in differentiating between willful offenders and poor parents, which may have unintentionally undermined how they judged. He provides evidence with thorough historiography to refute claims that they impeded the Act from making a critical difference in that corruption has been exaggerated, misrepresenting a successful piece of…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are here any limits on the principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty? In answering this question, I will first set out a traditional definition of Parliamentary sovereignty. I will then consider two different senses in which it might be said that there are limits on Parliament’s sovereignty.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    | | | |No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror | |Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. | |to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | | |Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random selection. | |random selection.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays