Assignment 1: The Criminal Justice Process

Improved Essays
The criminal justice process begins with the commission of a crime. A crime is the act in which the law has been violated. Often when a crime occurs, it is not immediately noticed by law enforcement. Crimes are normally reported by the victim or another citizen who witnessed the crime. For serious crimes such as felonies, police officers must have knowledge, facts, and circumstances which would allow a person of reasonable caution to believe that a crime has been committed (State, 2013). This paper provides a hypothetical scenario, where an in progress crime is taking place and a neighbor calls in the incident. Equally important, this paper focuses on the criminal justice process and
Identify the crime that occurred
On October 14, 2015
…show more content…
This information gave officers’ probable cause for an arrest. In this case the two suspects were arrested in the commission of a felony. Suspect number one was charged with breaking and entering an occupied residence. Suspect number two was charged with breaking and entering, and grand theft auto. Although an arrest takes away a person’s fundamental right to freedom, police must still follow proper protocol to carry out a legal arrest. In this case, neither the officer nor the deputy read the arrestees their Miranda Rights. Technically, since the first arresting officer did not interrogate the suspect, he was not obligated to read him his rights. When the detective interviewed the suspect, Miranda Rights were read. In this case the arresting deputy was in the wrong. The law states that Miranda Rights must be read prior to any interrogation procedures (Lewis, 2010). In order to prevent any unethical practices, many law enforcement agencies recommend that rights be read to a person at the time of an arrest. Furthermore, it is common practice for agencies to have this written into their …show more content…
The level of knowledge of a crime and the circumstances of arrest leading up to the trial is crucial to all criminal justice practitioners. Police officers, prosecutors, and judges must emagulate to ensure their actions are justified and the facts presented before them are consistent throughout the trial process. Disattention to any details could potentially clear a criminal of any wrong doing. Failure to examine all the evidence or commit prejudice before prosecution discredits criminal justice professionals and defaces the system as a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I read Inmate Mankel his rights from a standard Issue MCSO Miranda Rights card. I asked if he understood his rights, and he replied, “Yes.” I asked if he would voluntarily answer my questions. He stated, “Yes.” I asked Inmate Mankel what happened in the restroom.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What has been the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona on both law enforcement agencies and the court. -The arrested suspect must be told that they have the right to remain silent -The arrested suspect must be told that anything they say may be used against them in court -The arrested suspect must be told they have the right to an attorney with them before any questioning begins -They must be told that if they cannot afford an attorney an attorney can be provided for free -After they are told their rights and the arrested suspect says that they do not want an attorney and is willing to be questioned that they said so willingly and knowingly -The suspect has the right to turn off questioning any time after they have…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case pointed out that the 5th and 6th amendment rights included in Miranda won´t apply if a person didn´t have the legal rights in the first place. I believe the supreme court decision in Salinas v. Texas was accurate because without being interrogated and in custody there is no legal rights for the officers to give a person their…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning includes what rights we have when we are being arrested or interrogated. Police officers or other law enforcement officers must tell a person their Miranda rights during an arrest. After the warning is given to someone being arrested, the person also has the right to speak to an attorney. These rights became a part of the Fifth and Six amendments that already existed in our U.S. Constitution.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the early 1960’s four men were arrested on different crimes.. In the police department those men confessed to their crimes without ever being told their rights, mainly that the Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment. The confessions were used in court, and it became a question of whether those men’s constitutional rights had been violated. The question was answered in the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Newton (2004) 369 F.3d 659; see Allen v. Roe (2002) 305 F.3d 1046 (where the objectively reasonable need be based on what the officer knew at the time of questioning); see also United States v. Jones (2001) 154 F.2d 617 (likewise, holding the public exception applicable where police knew the suspect had a firearm in the apartment unattended with children present). In determining the objectively reasonable need, courts consider whether the defendant might have or recently have had a weapon and that someone other than the police might gain access to that weapon and inflict harm. (United States v. Williams (2007) 483 F.3d 425.) Accordingly, Miranda warnings are not required where there’s an objectively reasonable need in protecting the police or public from immediate danger and statements stemming from custodial interrogation must not be…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The infringement of Miranda’s rights by the police granted Miranda the right to appeal and challenge the verdict rendered in the initial case. On appeal, Miranda’s lawyer pointed out how the police failed in their role of informing Miranda of his right to remain silent, the right to be represented by a lawyer, and anything he says can be used against him in a court of law. The landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in 1966 pivoted in favor of the defendant by a majority ruling of 5 – 4. The broad ruling held the police at fault for not exercising proper principles of interrogation, highlighting the need for law enforcement officers to make specific points clear to a suspect before questioning (Bloom…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning that arose from the U.S. Supreme Court's Miranda v. Arizona decision assures that officers assure that those arrested are aware of their rights that protect against self-incrimination prior to any questioning. The ruling in Miranda does fulfill the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination and protects against the pressures of authority. The Miranda rights fulfills the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination because they protect against wrongful punishment and torture employed by authorities. Authorities can abuse their power in order to gain info or prove their suspicions correct.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Yadira Pichardo Assignment #1 Criminal Law Scenarios Read each of the following scenarios and answer the question(s) after each. Save this document to your computer; you will need to rename it, then type your answers on this document. Upload the document to the Assignment page: 1. John Lions was shopping at Target. He had a number of items in his cart when he approached the checkout counter.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Your miranda rights can hurt your case but they can also help. Ernesto Arturo Miranda March 9, 1941 January 31, 1976 was a laborer whose conviction on…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Five Amendments

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whereas the Fourth Amendment uses probable cause to set up if a crime is, has, or is about to occur and an arrest can be made. Then the Fifth Amendment comes into play, with the questioning of a person who has been arrested and the rights to the arrested person, specifically the reading of Miranda Rights. In 1966, Ernesto Miranda’s civil rights from the Fifth and Sixth were found to have been violated during the investigation and following interrogation. The Supreme Court determined that anyone who is in custody and being questioned needs to be read his or her specific rights, which included: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police question suspects and witnesses for two reasons, to gather information about the crime and to try to get a suspect to confess if they believe the individual is guilty. This is where Miranda rights are important. The Constitution guarantees certain rights including the following. The right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney, either one that is appointed by the state or one that is privately hired. To start with the first line of the Miranda statement “You have the right to remain silent”.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sermonfils E Dor 1.Describe and distinguish among the three approaches to studying criminal justice systems by taking an international perspective. Comparative criminal justice is a subfield of the study of criminal justice that relates different justice system from around the world. There are three different ways of studying criminal justice systems. Each of these approaches encounter various beliefs of different societies. The criminal justice systems have changed and transformed over time.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Decision making in the criminal justice system are met with competing values and interests. These conflicts relate to the determination of what is right or wrong and can be interrupted differently in some situations based upon the culture, changes over time, and on an individual’s upbringing. With this in mind, some decision such as those found in police discretion can be guided by social norms, justice, and personal values, but the police often encounter situations resulting in gray areas. Therefore, laws, training, and agency guidelines and code of conduct are put in place to assist officers in the decisions making process to set specific standards and processes (Gaines & Kappeler, 2011). With this in mind, the ethical and moral principles…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was one of my first classes as a criminal justice minor, and if I weren’t already half way done with my sociology degree, I would totally switch to criminal justice. Every single class I have taken relating to the CJ system has been interesting and I actually want to attend class and read the material, which I’m not sure if I can say the same about sociology. One thing I think I did well in class was time management. There were a lot of weekly assignments and it could’ve been very easy to slip up and forget about one of them.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics