Hypothetical Imperative

Improved Essays
Show More
The difference between problematic hypothetical imperative and assertorial hypothetical imperatives is that problematic is possible and assertional is actual, meaning problematic is an action that is good for some purpose but the problem is how you get there, like you may or may not (page 211). Assertorial is a good action you necessarily have to do.

The imperative that Kant thinks that corresponds to the attempt at attaining happiness is the assertorial hypothetical imperative.

According to Kant, the Categorical Imperative is “which declares an action to be objectively necessary in itself without interference to any purpose..” (page 211) and “commands a certain conduct immediately, without having its conditions any other purpose to be attainted

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty
    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    Due to examples such as the 2003 War in Iraq by the US, it can be seen that not all motivations are pure. Kant then states a limitation that not all actions are performed completely out of good will, and only categorical imperatives, which are actions that are done just for the sake of being done, and therefore considered as a priori since it is a means and an end, are truly pure. This is agreeable, however, it must be noted that hypothetical imperatives can also have good will (i.e. lying in order to protect someone’s feelings), yet at the same time, categorical imperatives would be more reliable. He gives four examples of categorical imperatives. Adherence to the first principle, which says one should not kill himself, is a must in order for humans to remain in the world, in addition to the importance of life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Determining Morality In Kant's Categorical Imperative
    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Determining Morality In Kant's Categorical Imperative

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    James Rachels And Stuart Rachel's The Elements Of Moral Philosophy
    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Rachels And Stuart Rachel's The Elements Of Moral Philosophy

    Hypothetical imperative is applicable to those with the desire, end or goal they want to achieve. And so, if I don’t desire to get an A on the exam or maybe I am satisfied with a C grade, the hypothetical imperative if you want an A on the exam, you ought to study does not apply to me. On the other hand, a categorical imperative is a rule or moral directive from reason that is binding without condition; a command that applies to all rational beings, no matter what. Actions done in accordance with these rules are morally good or morally…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Rhonda Should Claim To Be The Driver Analysis
    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rhonda Should Claim To Be The Driver Analysis

    Rhonda should claim to be the driver. When she agreed to drive after the party, she took on Larry’s trust, and the responsibility of their, and many others’, lives. Kant’s categorical imperative states that a person should “act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become universal law.” A maxim determines whether the actions that a person take are right, wrong, or permissible. Driving under the influence is wrong in any case and circumstances, as it endangers the life of the drivers, and others on the street.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hypothetical Imperatives
    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hypothetical Imperatives

    Philippa Foot in her text “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives” argues against the claim that moral judgments cannot be hypothetical imperatives, first presented by the philosopher Immanuel Kant. As found in her introduction on page 68-69 of the textbook, her argument is that moral judgments are categorical rather than hypothetical. But before one can explain her argument one must define and explain what hypothetical and categorical imperatives are. Kant himself wrote all imperatives command either hypothetically or categorically. He says that hypothetical imperatives “present the practical necessity of a possible action as a means to achieving something else which one desires.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Father Barbantio In Othello
    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Father Barbantio In Othello

    An Exploration of Othello: Delving into the Mind Frame of Desdemona and Iago Immanuel Kant’s view on ethics and morality is that in order to determine if we are acting in a fashion that can be deemed moral, we have not only a duty to ourselves but others. It is duty that determines our actions. Kant establishes certain limitations and restrictions upon the notion of duty, narrowing down a definition which would allow us to therefore be able to readily distinguish “whether the action which agrees with duty is done from duty, or from a selfish view” (Kant 2). In order to figure out whether our actions correspond to this concept of duty, Kant has established what is known as the categorical imperative which states that you should reflect upon your actions and be comfortable with them becoming a universal law. Insofar as duty is concerned, if we follow this principle it allows for a broader understanding of what is meant by moral and ethical behaviour.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    We Ought To Lie Analysis
    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We Ought To Lie Analysis

    One of the formulations of the Categorical Imperative goes: "Act as if your maxim were a universal law of nature. " Kant characterizes a maxim as a "subjective principle of volition," by which he implies a bearing or formula for how to carry on in a specific circumstance. One such saying can be "we ought to stay faithful to our obligations when we make them." According to this, we must approve of a maxim if it is one that everyone can follow without resulting in a "formal contradiction. " A perfect duty is one that must be followed to the fullest extent possible.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Mill Ethics Case Study
    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Mill Ethics Case Study

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative
    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary: Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Similarities Between Kant And David Hume
    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Kant And David Hume

    Kant states that it is the Categorical Imperative ( an unqualified moral obligation that applies to all rational beings ) what helps reason provide the standard. However, Kant’s moral theory is defined as deontological where actions are determined by rules of behavior. According to Kant, we experience reason as an obligation so we act in distinct ways or imperatives which can be found in two different ways: Categorical imperative and Hypothetical Imperative. Hypothetical Imperative is defined as; the performance of an action for the sake of the desired end. I.e if you want to lose weight, you must eat healthily, or if you want to pass the class, you must turn in your work.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Dilemma In William Golding's Lord Of The Flies
    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethical Dilemma In William Golding's Lord Of The Flies

    The categorical imperative is a moral obligation that is not dependent on the situation of individual, meaning there is a set rule for everyone. A Kantian would say that in order to do something, everyone else must also be allowed to do it. This means that if someone can lie, then everyone can lie, and if someone can steal then everyone can steal. A Kantian would add that if the situation in which you try to achieve your maxim is immoral, do not give up. Rather, you should find a different way in which to achieve the maxim.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Universal Law, Law Of Nature, And Humanity Formulation
    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kant's Universal Law, Law Of Nature, And Humanity Formulation

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    My Sister's Keeper Moral Analysis
    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages

    My Sister's Keeper Moral Analysis

    In the movie My Sister’s Keeper, Sara and Brian Breslin make the decision to conceive their daughter Ana through in vitro to donate compatible organs to their daughter Kate who suffers from acute promyelocytic leukemia. The ethical issue in this movie is the decision Ana’s parents made to go through with genetic pre-implementation with the specific goal of saving their older daughter Kate. The moral agent, Ana, faces moral obligations to save her sister by serving as an organ bank. She is at the center of an ethical dilemma as she has to decide what is best for her and her family.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Theory In Gone Baby Gone
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Theory In Gone Baby Gone

    Moreover, as long as the moral law does not depend on our desires, it consists of what is called ‘categorical imperatives’ in Kant’s philosophical works (Gakuran…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay
    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings