Hydrogen Vs Natural Gas

Improved Essays
1. Cost Analysis

The production of hydrogen from fossil fuels is said to be a mature technology. Of the two main fossils fuels used, natural gas offers the best economics and efficiencies and is the main pathway used to generate hydrogen nowadays, mainly for the production of ammonia and methanol. The other, being coal, can also be used to produce hydrogen but the initial investment is much greater and the efficiency is lower compared to when natural gas is used. Coal can be economically favourable when compared with natural gas for its lower feedstock cost [$1.26 per GJ LHV (lower heating value)], but due to high greenhouse gas emission from coal gasification makes it less favourable when compared with the lower carbon content natural gas.
…show more content…
In comparison with Europe the US market is two times bigger and is expected to rise to $1.605 million in 2010. Natural gas is currently the second most important source of energy for Europe, meeting around 25% of primary energy needs, forecast to rise towards 30% by 2020. Although gas demand is growing in all sectors of the economy, it is particularly strong in power generation, because when it is used instead of other fossil fuels, CO2 emissions are lowered significantly and other pollutants are much less. Natural gas is expected to almost double by 2020.
In cost analysis of industrial processes, capital-investment costs, manufacturing costs, and general expenses including income taxes must be taken into consideration. The total investment for any process consists of fixed-capital investment for physical equipment and facilities in the plant plus working capital which must be available to pay salaries, keep raw materials and products on hand, and handle other special items requiring a direct cash outlay. Also, capital must be allocated for direct plant expenses, such as those for raw materials, labour, and
…show more content…
N. Q O.615
Where Q is plant capacity (tons/year)
And N is no. of functional units
C = 8300 X 5 X 41200 0.615 = $28 589 719 1.4 Hydrogen storage
Hydrogen can be stored either in liquefied or compressed gaseous form. Liquefaction of hydrogen is a costly option. Compressors and heat exchanger cold-boxes account for most of the cost. It is estimated that the total cost for a liquefier is $ 1015 kg/d. Energy consumption by multi stage compression is approximately 10 - 13 kWh / kg of H2.
Compressors also play a major role in the capital and operating costs for compressing hydrogen. Multi stage compressors are required to achieve the required pressure of hydrogen. For gaseous hydrogen compression it is estimated a capital cost of $ 2000 - 3000 / kW and power requirement of 0.5 – 2 kW / kg / hr.
Although liquefaction is more costly than compression, storing of H2 in liquid form is inexpensive and more practical than storing H2 in compressed gaseous form. Hydrogen has the lowest energy density and thus more amount of hydrogen is needed to give equal amount of energy as gasoline. Therefore the higher the pressure, the lower the storage volume and higher the energy stored. (Ebner,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To replace carbon dioxide producing energy sources, such as coal, power plants have been burning natural gasses primarily composed of methane. In Bill McKibben’s article “Global…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the face of a multitude of examples, it is arguably naive to deny that cheap fossil fuels would improve lives. For one, by 2050, the world will have a projected population of 9.6 billion with majority living in cities, requiring large amounts of power and other necessities for living. With almost 1 trillion tons of global proven reserves, coal is the only fuel that can meet such demand at scale. Without coal, humanity's progress might screech to a halt, and potentially take a step backwards, affecting our daily…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you want to avoid a catastrophic climate change within the future of your existence, then the conversion of natural gas to liquid gas is not the answer for the future that you want for the America of tomorrow. So far, LNG plants seem to be the energy source that will bring a solution to the global warming disasters that fossil fuels have caused to the ozone layer, but the process of liquefying natural gas to an energy source is an intensive process. Brownsville is a city where it gets most of its profits out of tourism and the beach. Building an LNG plant will slowly destroy the beach with contamination, thus, making tourist less attracted to Brownsville’s beaches. LNG plant business plan on building their plants along the Brownsville Ship…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, Jadhav et al. propose the chemical recycling of CO2 as a practical technique to generate methane, which has great demand in the chemical and energy industries. Economically, CO2 is inexpensive as it is obtained from any industrial or natural sources and human activities. The production of methane from the hydrogenation of CO2 can indeed substitute natural gas and petroleum oil since it provides an unrestricted and renewable source for fuels, hydrocarbons, and energy as well as the possibility to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hydraulic Fracking Impact

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Natural gas is having many positive impacts on the U.S businesses because it is heating the offices at a lower price than it was when we had to buy it from overseas. Half of the homes in the United States use natural gas as the number one source for heating. Positive impact on the…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fracking involves a high pressure injection of a fluid that is made up of water, sand and other proppants suspended with the aid of thickening agents which is more commonly known as fracking fluid. It is injected into a wellbore to create cracks in the deep-rock formations so that natural gases and pretroleum can flow much more freely. Due to the fracking boom, the US has already surpassed Saudi Arabia in energy production and the US is on its way to becoming energy self sufficient. The amount of natural gases would increase as well and this massive increase in supply would mean much lower prices, it also means less need to import natural gas which would help the economy.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Natural gas isn't the only form of energy that we have available to us there are several other forms that we can use. These include solar power and hydroelectricity, which can cost less and be more…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even recently in the United States, we have discovered more natural gas that could already help us discourage our use of dirty coal. But, the bottom line is: it is expensive, and it would take a long time to replace our current fossil fuel…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But its striped away and destroy for coal, it is worse fossil fuel because it does the most damage to the environment near and people and a solid byproduct that has nowhere where it can be store safely. Near the Appalachian mountains is where the most coal extracted and used, mountains are being…

    • 1087 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fracking Essay

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I am all for renewable resources. I also strongly agree that natural gas is our way to wean off coal and slowly enter into renewable energy sources. I would just like to compare how natural gas can still win over renewable resources in one aspect. Let’s take a look at wind energy. As a renewable energy source, wind energy requires an immense amount of space to place the turbines.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The given pie charts provide statistical comparison the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980s and the 1990s According to the data given, most energy in 1980s (42%) was oil which is 9% more than in 1990s (33%). The second largest energy was natural gas in 1980s (26%). The coal was the third most source of power in 1980s and only one in twenty percentage of energy were hydroelectric power and nuclear power. However in 1990s the nuclear power increase to 5% and the same raising with coal energy.…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many negative articles describing fracking and the environmental impacts that surround it but, there are many positives to fracking such as the following. Economic impact Energy consumers are seeing economic gains, as a result from increased fracking, gas bills have dropped $13 billion per year from 2007 to 2013, which adds up to a total of $200 per year for gas consuming households. Households aren’t the only people seeing the difference, commercial, industrial, and electric power consumers, saw economic gains totaling $74 billion per year from increased fracking. In 2011, the United States produced 8,500,983 million cubic feet of natural gas from shale gas wells. Taking an average price of $4.24 per thousand cubic feet, which is…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ammonia Research Paper

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ammonia is a compound composed of nitrogen and hydrogen, having the formula NH3. The ammonia molecule is formed by sp3 orbitals as it has a tetrahedral geometry and a trigonal pyramidal shape. Ammonia has an experimentally determined bond angle of 106.7°, and an a bond length of 101.7 pm. The nitrogen atom in the molecule has a lone electron pair, which gives the molecule a dipole moment and polarity. Ammonia’s lone electron pair makes NH3 a base, a proton acceptor, and gives it the ability to readily form bonds.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Climate change comes to the fore as in any discussion of environmental. Human activities such as burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and using transportation are the main causes which rapidly accelerate climate change. However, such problems can be controlled and dealt with by making an effort to implement renewable energy and conserve energy as mentioned and the sequestration of carbon dioxide. Thermal power generation burning fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas has been used to produce electric energy.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays