As a youth, Hurwitz's priority was dynamic, radical music. As an adult, his priority has changed in that the importance now is money. From the gist of the article, it appears he is still excited and enjoys his life. Is he compromising anything to get ahead? I believe this depends on your point of view of the scenario itself. One can easily say his priorities have changed, and in doing so, his ethics have also changed. Does this imply an ethical objection to be raised? Once again, it depends. He states in the article that, “I want people to feel the excitement at my show” (Thomas-Lester, 2009). To him, I believe, this implies success, advancement, and prosperity. To a degree, this could be considered unethical as his key set of morals is not
