Constitutional Debates

Improved Essays
The relationships between the federal government and states have been approached in the constitutional debates among the founding fathers and throughout American history. Interpreting these relationships in various constitutional debates, the decision of either the federal government or states of having power over has led to new policies, revisions to old policies or even repealed some policies as a whole. By understanding the relationships, both federal, states, and local governments can…
In America’s “first” constitution, the Articles of Confederations, served as the original framework for the U.S. government during the Revolutionary War. Under the Articles of Confederations, Congress was a single house containing two to seven members from
…show more content…
From his philosophy, the purpose of creating a government is to protect individual liberties and property. He also believed in natural law, inalienable rights that every person is entitled to before governments existed, which includes life, liberty, and property. Along with these rights, all people should have these rights. On the contrary, many of the delegates including George Washington have slaves, who are deprived of many inalienable rights, and this created inconsistently between personal liberty and practice of slavery. Creating a government to protect individual liberties and property, the delegates believed that government was originally a social contract from the people. People would obey laws and pay taxes; in return, the government would protect them in return. Concerning with other world governments during this time period, most of the other government were ruled by monarchies. Our founding fathers opposed to the ideas of the monarchies and forged a republican government, having the people decide who is the best and the brightest amongst them to lead them. They also decided to balance the power of the government. As a result of breaking the government down in three branches Executive, Legislative, and Judicial plus bestowing each branch of government the ability to check the other two branches, it would generate stability between the government and the people. The last key idea that most …show more content…
At the very start of the convention, Governor Edmund Randolph or Virginia proposed the Virginia plan. It calls for the legislative to be divided in two houses; a lower house elected by state population and a higher house elected by the lower house. Along with the plan, a form of parliamentary government would be implied, which will grant congress broad powers over state legislatives, to elect presidents and federal judges, and have a “counsel of revisions” that can veto acts of congress.
Delegates from Delaware and New Jersey opposed the plan because it closed out on representation from smaller states due to the plan favoring states with higher populations. So, they proposed the New Jersey plan. Which similar to the Articles of Confederations, the legislative would have one house of equal representation with one member from each state. In addition of having powers over levy taxes and regulate interstate commerce and separate the executive and judicial branches, unlike in the Articles. Finally, it included a “National Supremacy Clause” illustrating that the constitution and federal laws would supersede state’s constitution and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The framers of the Constitution were visionaries who sought to establish a limited representative government which not only restricted the powers of an existing government, but also safeguarded the rights of the minority through restricting majority rule. A republic, they believed, would be the only form of government in which the liberty of the people could be preserved. Greatly influenced by the 17th century British philosopher John Locke, who advocated for the protection of natural rights of man by entering into a social contract, separation of governmental powers, and individuals’ right to consent to being governed, the founding fathers were able to incorporate such teachings into the Constitution of the United States. The American founders…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the first issues that was faced in the convention was how the states would represented in the legislature. James Madison drafted the Virginia Plan as a proposal to address this. The Virginia Plan was put before the convention by Edmund Randolph and proposed the government to be made into three different branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. Of these branches, the people would vote in the members of the two legislative branches, and then the cabinet members of the legislative branches…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edmund Randolph of Virginia proposed the number of representatives for a state would be determined by the population and the amount of finances the state provides the federal government. This became known as the Virginia plan. The smaller state opposed the Virginia plan feeling they would be under represented and taken over by the larger states. William Paterson purposed a new plan, referred to as the New Jersey plan, suggesting each state would have equal representation regardless of size. Both sides found it hard to find compromise.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New Jersey plan is the opposite of the Virginia plan and it was made to fix the faults in the Articles of Confederation. Unlike the Virginia plan, the New Jersey plan centered the federal government in a unicameral (one chamber) congress. The congress would be accountable for raising tariffs, negotiating with foreign powers, settlement of territories, and making war and peace. The New Jersey plan proposed that the seats in the congress would be represented equally among the states. So, smaller states such as New Jersey, New York, and Delaware benefited from the New Jersey plan because they had equal representation as larger states.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, a convention was held to assemble all of the fifty-five delegates at the Pennsylvania state house in Philadelphia. During this convention the New Jersey plan and the Virginia plan which were inherited from the Articles of Confederation were discussed. These two plans had different opinions on how the states were to be represented. The New Jersey plan called for equal representation between the thirteen states. While the Virginia plan called for representation by population.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The states would also maintain equal representation in the national Congress and the power was derived from the states rather than the people. Similarly, the states would ratify the new Constitution rather than the people. The people against the Federalists were the primary supporters of the New Jersey Plan. This plan was simply a revision of the Articles of Confederation, and did not change the national government enough for the Federalists. The Convention did decide to go with the Virginia Plan, however, they did revise it so at the end, and it was not completely the same as the…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress was one house, filled with people who were chosen by the state government as a way to voice their opinion in Congress. Each state, no matter the size, got one vote on issues (AoC,Article 5, Clause 4: In determining questions in the united states, in Congress assembled, each state shall have one vote), and if any amendments were to be added to the Articles, each state had to agree with it. The central government also didn’t have a president or any other presiding officer. The fear of an overly powerful higher government was prevalent in American society.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The new document was the U.S. Constitution. Discussions about the Virginia and New Jersey plans led to the second compromise. The second compromise was the issue of fair political representation for each of the states. Some delegates wanted a representation by population…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    William Patterson introduced the New Jersey Plan at the Constitutional Convention in June of 1787. “Patterson wanted to improve upon the Article of Confederation and to allow each state to be run independently, rather than being control by a large body state.” (Roche). This means that the plan will allow each state regardless of the amount of population, to have one vote and allow for the same amount of representative in all states, selected by a legislature. The plan will also give congress the power to raise money through tariffs of imported goods, and Judiciary body of the government will regulate commerce with other nations.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Virginia Plan weakened this state powers and empower the Congress, maintaining the harmony of the nation and push the political system to upper level. In the paper of “New Jersey Plan” by Levy, Leonard W, William…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would give states representation based on proportionate population. They also considered the New Jersey Plan. This plan proposed a single house legislative where any state, regardless of size, would have the same representation. John P. Roche puts forth his thoughts that the founding Fathers were…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, the distribution of representation from the Virginia and New Jersey Plan widely differed. The Virginia Plan was highly represented by the more populous states within the federal government and the New Jersey Plan seemed to provide most of their representation through smaller states who wanted to prevent unbalancing the United…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention meant to revise the Articles of Confederation. Instead they began a compromise to form a constitution. James Madison from Virginia proposed a plan that called for a three branch government: legislative, judicial, and executive. This was meant to separate the powers, assuring that not one group or individual could have too much authority. In this plan was also a system that allowed each branch to check the other.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The author of the book A Brilliant Solution, Carol Berkin, a successful American historian that was born in 1942 in Alabama and was awarded the Bancroft Dissertation Award, from her college at Columbia University where she was awarded and an M.A. and a Ph.D. He has written many books In her book, she summarizes the key elements in the creation of our current government and constitution. She goes into detail factoring in people's beliefs and views to help generalize an individual's standpoint on an issue. In the book, Ms. Berkin is trying to argue that the creation of the constitution was not an easy process but was very tedious work. The book A Brilliant Solution is divided into many chapters but its best summarized in the parts starting…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Small states were in favour of New Jersey Plan, under which all states would have equal representation in the legislature. On the other hand, large states advocate the Virginia Plan to form a Bicameral (two-house) legislature in which representatives would be appointed according to population. The Great Compromise between the states gave rise to a bicameral Congress in which states were given equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives. Roger Sherman played a decisive role in success of Philadelphia Convention. He is remembered as the architect of the Connecticut Compromise.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays