Hunting And Gathering: The Slow Development Of Agriculture

Improved Essays
For the past 7 million years, humans have found methods of survival. From the beginning of the human race, until agriculture is discovered and introduced, hunting, gathering, and scavenging was the only viable strategy of getting food (Weisdorf, 2005). These methods have evolved over time as either food supplies increased, decreased or disappeared. There wasn't a choice but to adapt to their surroundings to survive. From the beginning until about 10,000 years ago, hunting and gathering appeared to be the only viable methods as nothing else had been implemented successfully up to that point. Around 8500 BC, agriculture started to make an appearance in some parts of the world successfully. The transition to agriculture has been slow throughout time and adapted differently and at a different pace in each part of the world. What are some of the factors that led to the slow development of agriculture?
Hunting and gathering had been the primary survival method from the beginning of humanity until about 10,000 years ago. Up until the appearance of agriculture, people spent their days out and about
…show more content…
This involved the domestication of both plants and animals which took place over many years in different regions of the world. The factors that led to the development and rise of agriculture appear to be independent of each other but taken together appear to provide a significant push to find a better, more efficient way of supplying themselves with food. By developing new technologies, they had the potential to have a better future with their food supply right at their house as opposed to having to leave and gather all day. Agriculture eventually displaced hunter-gatherers in most areas and became the primary food procurement strategy, partially in part to the lack of wild foods in the areas and a need to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Neolithic transition brought with it the change from subsistence farming to sedentary agricultural lifestyles. The development of sedentary farming communities brought the Neolithic era an influx of new technology that makes this era a monumental marker for human history. These communities also brought new techniques for planting, fertilizing, and selecting seeds which all created larger yields and increased the reliance on sedentary cultivation. They also may be responsible for the decline of women's' social and economic positions in society that still affect people today. By 3500 B.C. people in the Middle East supported enough nonagricultural people to begin the first civilizations by using technology and tools such as digging sticks,…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Animal Domestication

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The domestication of animals and plants played a significant role in the lives of Neolithic people. Throughout the Paleolithic Age, groups of people hunted for animals and gathered naturally grown food. As T. Walter Wallbank mentioned, “Often described as the ‘first economic revolution’ in the history of man, this momentous change from a food-gathering to a food-producing economy initiated the Neolithic Age” (Document 1). Agriculture and economics became an important factor during this revolution. This concept is also pointed out in the comic by the Science Museum of Minnesota, “Plant and animal domestication is the key.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. At the beginning humans were relying on natural resources and hunting but now we made this system that we can have anything at any time. Back then humans were hunting for food and fighting with the predator with the minimum tools to survive but now we have massive farms and agriculture that we rely on and we eliminate all the predators. If this system break most of us going to die because of hunger.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Domestication of both animals and plants happen during the evolution of hunter-gatherers in the beginning to farming in the end. In the development of both these types of techniques to get resources we also developed a feel of human civilization. From Hunter-Gatherers to Farmers we have seen the changes of influences in the world we live in today. There are many advantages and disadvantages in hunter-gatherers, farmers, and the effects it has on humanities dealing with society and technology. Hunter-Gatherers had strong differences from today's society of agriculture and cities.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why was it that some of the most fertile areas of the world currently didn’t develop farming power? This chapter was mostly an in depth analysis about when places in the world first domesticated plants and animals as the latter chapter discusses as being vital to success. It needs no explanation why food production wasn’t formed in Eurasia’s artic areas or some of Africa’s desserts. It would simply be unable to support domesticated plants and animals. Farming first developed in small negligible parts of the globe.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people view agriculture as the key to success in human history and that it ultimately led humans to become civilized. In fact, the reasons are plausible. With agriculture present, humans were able to efficiently find food and store crops. Their unoccupied time was used to create marvelous architecture, compose musical masterpieces, and much more that we associate with the unique attributes that separate humans from animals. However, with good follows bad.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author presents his claim that the idea of agriculture was detrimental to our lives as human beings, and he goes on in the rest of the article to support this argument with scientific evidence provided by various paleopatholigists and his own personal experiences. Though the article is classified as an editorial, the author visits New Guinea and uses his experiences there to further his claim. This conflict is present throughout the text, for the author portrays his view of the effect of agriculture on the primitive and modern lives of human beings. He believes that agriculture posed as a threat to our advancement as human beings and opposes the idea altogether.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The domestication of animals also allowed for farmers to more effectively farm their land (Diamond 74). However, not all places had land that was suitable for the development of agricultural practices that would produce enough food surplus for the people to have specialists that could create better weapons, better farming techniques, etc. that would lead to organized politics (Diamond 58-62). Some places did not have enough land or the land was not suitable to crops, or at least the crops they had domesticated up to that point (Diamond 57). The available amount of arable land not only limited how much food was available, but also limited the population that could live in that area (Diamond 57).…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As soon as this Agricultural Revolution broke out, hunters and gatherers learned how to plant and grow…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As explained in his infamous essay, “The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race,” Jared Diamond argues that the adoption of agriculture led to many negative consequences that have hindered the general livelihood of humans. His argument is based on the comparison of the lifestyles of agriculture-based societies and hunter-gatherers, claiming that the latter lacked many of the challenging aspects that emerged with the beginnings of domestication and civilization. Diamond’s main points of focus are the negative health effects of people’s new diet, the increased spread of diseases, and the development of societal inequalities. In general, I agree with Diamond’s claim that the adoption of agriculture had some negative effects on humans,…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Instead of constantly moving around to find food sources, agriculture allow people to settle down in one place. Agriculture means less time to find food and more time to spare, people started to build amazing architecture and houses to their needs. With so much free time, people created some of the world’s impressive art forms. As agriculture continued to rise,…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Farming is the bedrock of America. For a long time, Americans were required to own land to vote and most Americans were farmers. Before the industrial age most had a farm and the men and their families would work on the farm to provide for their families. Eventually as time went on improvements were made not only to farming but to the roads and transportation as well. It was not only the Americans progressing as planters or farmers.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Agriculture Shift Agriculture began to spread throughout many Native territories, specifically the Northeastern and Southeastern, and began to transform many of the societies that relied on hunting and gathering for resources. As agriculture expanded, many cultures adapted to different economical systems to cater to this change. One primary crop, corn, managed to impact the entire eastern seaboard by making both Northeastern and Southeastern cultures use their environment to their full advantage. This efficient use of nature enabled agriculture to flourish. Each group’s economical practices began to intertwine with agricultural practices, shifting earlier ideals.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘Some human groups adapt to a new way of life. Others go after the bison’ [http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?historyid=ab63#ixzz3n8mZaeVA]. For those natives that decided to pursue a new way of life learnt quickly that they would have to adapt their means of gathering food, they soon discovered that ‘plants of all kinds grow more easily in the new temperate zones’, they also ‘learned that they could grow these plants where they wanted by collecting and planting the seeds from these wild plants’. As well as their new found farming skills, the natives would also go on to learn to domesticate animals, such as llama and…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    There is no smoking gun that connects agriculture specifically to the problems Diamond outlines. If one looks at the evolution of human biology over many centuries, overall human health has improved dramatically. The only reason why the standard of health might have dipped with the adoption of agriculture was that it was a change that the human body was not used to, but we have balanced out over time to where today, we enjoy an overall higher standard of living than hunter-gatherers. It is clear that Diamond wants to shift away from producing and pivot back to foraging, but this…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Brilliant Essays