Humorous Wedding Speech: A Boy Who Killed His Father

To the reverential and obliged members of this honest jury, my dedicated team and I thank you earnestly for your presence for participating in this crucially mundane process. We ask each of you to take the arguments made here and the valid points that are enacted into serious consideration, for which we are making the decisions that will impact a multitude of people within this country. Let us begin our civic duties with indignation in our hearts by starting with this question: should we let a boy who had assassinated his father quite innocuously, walk free among the innocent people in the streets? A product of the slums who deliberately murdered his own father out of pure rage by manipulating a switchblade knife, walk free to his undeserving …show more content…
She had stated that she had seen the boy stab his father through the moving elevated train at around midnight in between the two apartments. Gentlemen, how would you respond to that? A happy-go lucky woman who was witnessed murder for the first time in her life, and do you honestly anyone would scheme the feelings of pure shock? That woman has seen the boy grow up from a child through his adolescent years, and only to witnesses that very boy stab his father in refined vengeance. Regardless of the speed the elevated train was moving at, the lady had on looked the event occurring across, thus proving that it had occurred. This testimony is striving to push the envelope to prove that the boy is guilty, with the ludicrous story he professes. He possesses a cold fire in his heart, and is everywhere: in every evidence presented, in everything I say. Do you still believe that the boy is honorable, despite the validity of her …show more content…
But, why should he? Like a mouse stuck in trap, the old age has imprisoned him with fatigue and sickness to deem himself to be purposeful in this particular case. Others may say that the old man would have been to slow to actually see the culprit of the crime. However, the old man is another neighbor who overhears the boy screech to his father, “I’m going to kill you!”. A second later he heard the father's body falling, and he saw the boy running out of the house fifteen seconds after that. Not only that, the evidence is obviously reprimanded. How do you argue against that? The boy had stated his intent, according to the old man, and ended up killing his father with a knife that he brought on the night of. How do you know if the old man was slow, gentlemen? How have you controlled every aspect of this scene you have reenacted? Every result we have gotten is merely an approximated guess of what happened, and that is not acceptable when you are sealing the fate of the life of a