David Hume's First Impression Essay

Improved Essays
Hume divides “perception” into two things, “impressions” and “ideas”. To him impressions transmit to “sensing” or “feeling”, while ideas relate to “thinking”. “Sensing” should be assumed to be comprehensive, as Hume divides feelings into those of “sensation” and “reflection”. The main difference between the two is that reflections come from what we experience in our mind such as emotions, however; sensations come from our senses such as the sensation of touch. According to Hume, ideas are just “faint copies” of impressions that are “less forcible and lively”. An example of this is that we can love someone which is an impression and we can think about the concept of love which would be an idea. The concept will always feel fainter and weaker yet he directly …show more content…
The opinion that all ideas derive from sensory impressions is very appealing because there are ideas that don’t agree at all with our sense experience. An example of this is unicorns. Hume claims that basic ideas are replicas of impressions. Complex ideas cannot be copies of impressions however; they are composed of simple ideas. Take a unicorn for example; we have experiences of horses, horns and white color. Putting all that together gives us a unicorn. Hume believes all ideas originate from sensory impressions. He gives two arguments for his position. First, all ideas can be broken down into very simple ideas each of which can resemble an impression. Hume gives an example as the “idea of god” comes from the sensory impressions of “infinitely intelligent, wise and good being”. His second argument is that without a specific type of experience a person is lacking the ability to formulate an idea of that experience. He gives an example of how a blind man does not know color and how a mild mannered man cannot understand the motive of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He feels as if there was no “constant”, but instead, a casual contact among perceptions. Locke, however, feels that consciousness is what ties together the mind and body In conclusion, both John Locke and David Hume had interesting ideas on self-identity. While still having credible observations, I feel that Hume, in not accepting anything more than a bundle of impressions, left out much of the human experience, such that when the human is studied solely on a scientific level, without thought to his emotional being, much is left out and misunderstood.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume's Argument

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Hume begins his argument by asserting that animals, just like humans, learn from experience and come to infer causal connections between events. Hume describes this principle by saying: “[animals] become acquainted with the more obvious properties of eternal objects, and gradually, from their birth, treasure up a knowledge of the nature of fire, water, earth, stones, heights, depths, &c. and of the effect, which result from their operation” (Hume, 70). In order to illustrate his point, Hume cites several examples: horses learn what heights they can safely leap, and dogs learn to fear the sight of a whip (Hume, 70). Furthermore, Hume claims that non-human animals certainly do not learn to make these inferences by means of reason or argument.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To attack a piece of accepted knowledge is bold to say the least, and here Descartes’ focus is to better justify how one can credibly dispute anything. The idea of cutting an idea by the roots, as the tree metaphor is prominent, is new but also the way that is most effective in differentiating from the reality of life. Descartes poses the idea that as much as one can fool themselves to believe they are not dreaming, it is never certain whether we are in a physical conscious state. This idea is rather perplexing as, when looked deeper into, holds no faults. It can be said that any physical senses are not present in the dream state, but it is not necessarily true to everyone.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This relationship between the soul and sensation provides a basis for thoughts. From Epicurus’s…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compared to Locke, Hume offered a stricter empirical explanation regarding personal identity, because he believed knowledge was only attainable through “sense-perception”. Unlike Locke, Hume avoided appeals to God and did not trust the human senses—seeing, smelling, hearing, feeling, and tasting. For instance, Locke stated, “God is without beginning…and therefore concerning his identity there can be no doubt” (x); nevertheless, Hume rejected appeals to God and focused on experiences, which influenced him to introduce two new, enlightening ideas—impressions and ideas. Impressions refer to intense sensations or passions that are experienced by the senses while ideas were mentally thought-out or “faint images” of these urges or experiences (x).…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One Out of Many by V.S. Naipaul and On Seeing England for the First Time by Jamaica Kincaid are two first person texts where the narrators are driven into an unknown world. While both narratives deal with changes and the consequences those changes enable, they each show radically different perspectives. Naipaul’s narrator, Santosh, struggles with the internal pressures he places on himself when he doesn’t feel as though he blends in with his new environment, while Kincaid’s narrative focuses on the external pressures and the struggle of fighting oppression in a society that has already succumbed to it. Perception is a concept, or a creation built on how each individual sees the world. When an idea becomes entwined with the realism of life,…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Transcendentalism is social movement that was developed in New England around 1836 in reaction to rationalism. The transcendentalist movement is based on an idea that, in order to understand the nature of reality, one must first examine and analyze the reasoning process that governs the nature of experience. It may have started in 1836, but it still continues into our society today. This can be found in music, art, and movies, particularly, Disney movies. The movie Up is about a man named Carl who travels to the South African rain forest, a spot his wife and him had always wanted to go.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For David Hume, there are significant issues with the statement, “The ice cream melted because it was left out in the sun.” As an empiricist, he would claim that it is impossible to believe in causation and remain consistent. Some of Hume’s most important of contributions comes from his work on the philosophy of causation. Hume’s main axiom in his work is known as the Copy Principle, which states that every thing we come to think and know is through our own experience. The contents of the mind are perceptions, which can be further divided into impressions and ideas.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As mentioned previously, Hume believes that all ideas and concepts come from previous experience. Every idea from the simplest to the most complex that us humans have had, or are going to have in our lifetime, can all be traced back to and fuelled down to our impressions, or experiences with our inner and outer senses. On the contrary, if we cannot trace an idea back to its origins, then the idea should be discarded and rejected as meaningless. Hume’s Copy Principle requires one to understand the difference between simple and complex ideas as well as the difference between ideas and impressions. David Hume defines simple ideas as those made up of simple or one identity and cannot be further broken down into more basic concepts.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers John Locke and George Berkeley agreed that knowledge is derived from experience. However, while Locke argued that knowledge is also acquired through our senses, such as, primary qualities, the perception, and secondary qualities, the object perceived, Berkeley argued that our minds and ideas are the sole essence of most knowledge, except knowledge of self and knowledge of God. As a subjective idealist, he believed that physical objects only exist as they are perceived. More specifically, there are no primary or secondary properties of objects in themselves, and also, matter cannot be discovered through sensory perception. Both philosophers claimed that knowledge comes through experience, but Berkeley argues that material objects cannot exist if not experienced.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke's Argument Against Innate Ideas

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    This is the belief that it is not possible for there to be ideas in the mind that one is not aware of. Rationalists argued that once children grew up and developed mentally, they would be able to understand the innate ideas. For Locke, the idea that they have to be able to reason to understand and ideas that are supposed to be innate shows and strengthens his argument. This would, however, have to be based on the notion that innate ideas were conscious ideas. On the other hand, if these ideas are gained after reasoning or in conjunction with reasoning, they are not in fact innate fore if they were, such ideas would include mathematics.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ideas are defined as whatever is perceived or understood about something; despite this simple denotation, humankind 's capacity to acquire and understand these complex thoughts remains a controversy in philosophical literature. As major role models in the foundation of modern philosophy, Descartes and Locke feud over the definition of these ideas, the acquisition of these concepts, and the content of these thoughts. Descartes identifies with a rationalistic view where knowledge is based on innate ideas and these ideas are acquired through reason, whereas Locke believes in empirical explanations which state that ideas are formulated from sensory experiences with the outside world. In many of Descartes’ works, he emphasizes the importance of…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contrary to rationalism, Hume argues against the existence of innate ideas, suggesting instead that humans can only have knowledge gained from experience, which he calls impressions of sensations, and the subsequent ideas which are recalled from experience. Hume describes impressions as “[A]ll our more lively perceptions, when we hear, or see, or feel, or love, or hate, or desire, or will” (Hume, p.18, gp.13), and he furthers this by explaining that “[I]mpressions are distinguished from ideas, which are the less lively perceptions, of which we are conscious, when we reflect on any of those sensations or movements above mentioned” (p.18, gp.13). The basis of Hume’s argument is that humans acquire knowledge from experience—what is seen, heard, felt, etc.—and that all subsequent ideas come from these impressions which are gathered from experience. In addition, these impressions of sensation work together with ideas to give knowledge; without both, knowledge cannot be…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher David Hume investigates the nature of causation and how there is no way of humans understanding the necessary connection between cause and effect. This idea of necessary connection is crucial to understanding the logical structure of Hume’s arguments about causation because it is the central power of a cause to produce its corresponding effect. Accordingly, Hume argues that humans can never know the necessary connection between causes and effects because the laws of nature that govern this power are beyond comprehension. Moreover, Hume makes distinctions between what he calls Impressions and Ideas that sheds light on the ways in which ideas come into the mind. Additionally, Hume classifies three types of primary connections that bind all thoughts together, which are termed resemblance, contiguity, and cause and effect.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays