Hume Moral Judgments

Improved Essays
Moral judgments attribute moral qualities to an action. They concern either the existence of moral qualities (qualities of virtue or of obligation) or causal relationships between those moral qualities and other objects of our experience. If moral judgments are matter of fact judgments, then there are two senses in which moral judgments may be reasonable or unreasonable, true or false. Moral judgments are false when founded on a false supposition about the existence of moral qualities or when founded on misinformation about means and ends, or cause and effect. In either case it is the judgment which is mistaken. The point was first made by Hume in a general way:
A person may be affected with passion, by supposing a pain or pleasure to lie in an object, which has no tendency to produce either of these sensations, or which produces the contrary to what is imagined. A person may also take false measures for the attaining his end, and retard, by his foolish conduct, instead of forwarding the execution of any project .
But Hume also makes the same point with specific
…show more content…
Only passions, according to Hume, can motivate us. Reason can guide our conduct, but it can never motivate conduct or oppose the course of the passions. In order to explain how moral judgments can influence or guide conduct, we must understand the relationship between moral judgment and moral sentiment. Moral judgments are factual judgments about moral sentiments. One of the properties of moral sentiments or impressions is that, like all impressions, they give rise to ideas, in this case moral ideas. Among the properties of moral ideas, the ideas of virtue and vice, is that they give rise to the indirect passions. By giving rise to the indirect passions, action can be produced. The moral judgment which embodies the moral idea thus influences action by informing us of matters in which we are predisposed to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, he argues that moral statements simply express our attitudes about things in a non-descriptive manner and try to persuade others to share our own attitudes. Moral disagreement means a clash of different ideas and emotions. Ayer proves that moral statements are meaningless. Ayer first proposes that meaningful statements are either analytic or synthetic.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Midterm, Regan and Midgley: Understanding the Reality of Moral Judgment According to Tom Regan in “How Not to Answer Moral Questions,” moral judgment is irrelevant to the reality of moral truth. Though such judgments require understanding, justification, sound reasoning, real-world application, and independent verification, the mere existence of such judgments does not affect the truth of the matter. In “Moral Isolationism” Mary Midgley adopts a similar conclusion to Regan, though she does so through the argument of individual morality.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Connors and McCormick’s work Character, Choices, and Community examine person, action, and community as the essential elements of moral experience as prescribed within the Gospel message. This paper will expound upon the central themes of Connors and McCormick’s work and apply their treaties to the Andres Plane Crash as a way to examine how person, action, and community from moral norms and moral reasoning. In concluding, I will highlight the importance of community and context to the formation of one’s ethics and morality. Connors and McCormick insist that reflection on morality should begin with one’s lived experience rather than mere theory or idealist principles. It is within one’s lived experiences that we start to become aware of a…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hume uses the example of a banished statesman who has been offered kindness from his enemy even when he must leave the town. If it were learned that the event happened thousands of years prior, there would still be praise given in the present without any selfish intent from the praiser. Next, Hume says…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It all again goes back to sentiment being a liable part of the decision making. If in anyway it was possible to act without opinion, i would agree with Hume's suggestion that justice acts for the good of humanity. In this text Hume weighs the usage of sentiment and reason in moral decision making and then takes a deeper look at the justice…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Hume, despite appearances, everyone really does agree about the problem of liberty and necessity. In this essay I shall discuss the basis of Hume's argument, which I posit rests upon his views on necessary connection. That is, our notion of necessary connection comes about through the observation of constant conjunction of objects and events, from which we infer causal relationships. Furthermore, Hume applies his view of necessity to human nature and behaviour, and asserts that, despite what they may say, all people carry out their lives in a manner which indicates a convergent belief in necessity, both in unintelligent objects and humans. Finally, I shall evaluate Hume's compatibilist position, as presented in the Enquiry, **********…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with Hume's argument, “morality is sentiment”, because sometimes, my feelings impact my actions and my attitudes. Depending on my feelings, I do things differently than I would do when I am emotionally stable. If it is asked right or wrong, I would say it is wrong because we live in a society where rules are required to obey and follow whether we have born naturally evil or have born good and pure. We can understand someone's action in the view of Hume's but we cannot justify his or her action.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The interesting aspect of morality is how universally unbiased it is supposed to be, but yet, is still met with a debate towards what is morally correct and morally wrong. While morality is supposed to be objective, there is a subjectivity to whom those morals apply to and to whom they benefit or harm. In Chelsea Schein and Kurt Gray’s "The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm,” they discussed the evolution of morality and how difficult it is to establish a clear answer on what morality is. Schein and Gray wrote, “[one] definition of moral judgment is ‘evaluations (good vs. bad) of the actions or character of a person that are made with respect to a set of virtues held to be obligatory by a culture or subculture’ (Haidt, 2001, p. 817)” (Schein and Gray 35).…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hume Vs Kant

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages

    According to Kant, the contradiction comes about because suicide overrides the function of self-love, which is a continuation of life. Furthermore, all rational individuals have the duty of seeking the happiness of others and their perfection and failing in realizing such a task would result in willing inconsistency. Physician-assisted suicide, therefore, according to Kant destructs the rational agency of attaining tolerability in the state of affairs. Nevertheless, both Hume and Kant holds the same perceptions when Kant never opposed the preliminary arguments of Hume leading to the justification of physician-assisted suicide but he only differed on the resulting conclusion that was made by Hume.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Along with this, moral judgements must take into account the intentions of the person performing the action. Despite…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The study was carried out also to prove that a child’s ability to make moral judgements develops in a predictable way during childhood. Identify the theoretical proposition or hypothesis on which…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hume believed that justice promoted human happiness. Hume was a moral sentimentalist so he believed morality was grounded in something other than reason. He was similar to Hutcheson in this aspect but he also believed individual justice can sometime conflict with what benevolence would motivate us to do. A sentimentalist believes that judgments about what is right depends on our passions rather than reason or a moral sense but, he also thinks the sentimentalist owes us an account of how a sense of justice that is opposed to sympathy or self-interest that can also develop out of such motives. The virtue of justice in not natural and is actually artificial according to Hume.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays