Hume's Priori Knowledge

Improved Essays
As Hume has once thought that “reality is the world we experiment”; this statement shows how Hume acquires his personal knowledge from real world experiment. He also thought that “truth is a knowledge of relations between ideas. Knowledge of the empirical world is limited.” Kant thought that “reality is the world of experience that we actively construct” and “we construct knowledge by applying the faculties of the mind to sense experience”. Kant on the other hand is disturbed from thinking that everything in science is fine by Hume’s argument. Kant concludes that “there is pure in a priori knowledge but are rather the pre-conditions for any possible experience.” This essay will explore and answer the question: Are there just two ways in which …show more content…
To him, a priori knowledge is universal. An example could be sour apples are delicious; this is because we are picking out the actual taste of the apple when we bite into it. But in Hume’s sense, it is clear to say that words are ideas. When we say the word dog, it stands for our own idea of what a dog is. The idea of a dog is copied from our own idea of impressions of dogs. To Hume, complex ideas are composed of simple ones. And the simple ideas can be tracked back to an impression from which they were copied or else they are meaningless. Hume’s idea is that the humankind knowledge falls into two categories or kinds. The first knowledge is relations of ideas which means all a priori knowledge and the second type of knowledge is matters of fact which is all empirical knowledge. We know that it is a relations of ideas when we can deny things without having to get ourselves involved in any contradictions. We found a matter of fact when we can imagine thing being false and there is no contradictory about the subject/ object. An example for these two kinds could be the bachelors. When we say all bachelors are unmarried is in the relations of ideas. This is because when we imagine a married bachelor, that doesn’t make sense. But we know that it doesn’t make sense because we know the meaning of what a bachelor is: single man. But what if we say bachelors are messy? We would say that not all of bachelors are messy… this is because not all bachelors are messy, some are extremely neat indeed and therefore, it is a matter of fact. Other examples could be all triangles have three sides, we cannot imagine or practice a triangle with less than or more than three sides, therefore, it is a relations of ideas. But what if we say all dogs have four legs, it is true that most of the dogs have four legs, but what if some dogs were born with less than 4 legs or

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    For example, the idea of the moon is not as vivid as actually looking at it. Moreover, nothing can exist in the mind without being first being experienced and or from through a blend of other experiences. Hume’s argument cannot be significant because it lacks any reason to understand how to get true knowledge from induction. As well as, it does not allow for any analytical and mathematical truths that exist in the world. Kant’s Epistemology is the union of the Rationalist and Empiricist views of knowledge.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    He explains that even the small part of the universe we’re aware of is so diverse with many different springs, principles, and systems. Hume's point reveals that the comparison itself is a hasty generalization because we don't know enough about the universe as a whole to compare it to a machine. Also, alternative analogies and explanations exist that could be more probable. Hume explains it’s possible that the material world of matter falls into order or arranges itself on its own like the mental world of ideas.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume's Argument

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Hume begins his argument by asserting that animals, just like humans, learn from experience and come to infer causal connections between events. Hume describes this principle by saying: “[animals] become acquainted with the more obvious properties of eternal objects, and gradually, from their birth, treasure up a knowledge of the nature of fire, water, earth, stones, heights, depths, &c. and of the effect, which result from their operation” (Hume, 70). In order to illustrate his point, Hume cites several examples: horses learn what heights they can safely leap, and dogs learn to fear the sight of a whip (Hume, 70). Furthermore, Hume claims that non-human animals certainly do not learn to make these inferences by means of reason or argument.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also claims that every detail of intelligence that we have an understanding of is within animals, then proceeds to argue that it is more logical to view intelligence not as the originating cause of conflict order, but as a resulted cause. Hume believes that intelligence is not the beginning cause, but it is the blind, uncaring forces of nature that contributes to cause. A law implies a law creator, without a law creator, the law is meaningless and cannot accomplish anything to where Hume…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hume is a philosopher who is skeptical of miracles in any form. The first argument behind Hume’s skepticism is surrounded by the idea of a priori. A priori is having knowledge or a belief based on one’s thought alone, independent from experience. This is simply believing what you have heard from a separate source, or one’s own hypothesis, without proof.…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aquinas Vs Kant

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In order to understand Kant’s concept of metaphysics, it is important to note the differences between a priori knowledge and a posteriori knowledge. A posteriori knowledge is knowledge gained via experience, while a priori knowledge is knowledge that is gained without experience. Kant claims that metaphysics “must never be derived from experience ...(and) is therefore a priori cognition, coming from pure understanding and pure reason” (Kant, 266). In other words, Kant believes that metaphysics is comprised of nothing but a priori judgments. To further refine his claim, he outlines clear distinctions between two types of judgments: analytic judgments and synthetic judgments (Kant, 266).…

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume’s Fork is one of the many answers to Descartes’ Challenge. The Challenge asks, “How do I know the outside world matches my sense data?”. Hume’s Fork responds by stating that there are only two types of “justified knowledge”, the knowledge being the certainty of what you know to be true, which is asked for in Descartes’ Challenge. The first type of knowledge is a synthetic, a posteriori claim, which we make based on the sensations we experience as raw, forced data.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume’s Argument for the Belief in Uniformity of Nature Hume begins section seven of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding by expanding on his definitions he introduced in previous sections. In this section, on the idea of necessary connection,…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main concepts that Hume is known for is his idea of causality and the problem of induction. Hume believed that we can cannot prove…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lastly, Kant presents A priori ideas, which in term is a special kind of idea that tells you about the possibility of human experience, however these experiences don’t depend on experience that you have already had, but are supplied by reason in order to make sense of an…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However the knowledge we gain by analyzing the categories is synthetic a priori knowledge. Therefore Kant believed that people can’t establish the existence of universal moral laws by remaining with the phenomenal reality. It is necessary for people to use the power of pure reason to enter into the noumenal…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    German philosopher Immanuel Kant, uses his writing Prolegomena to discuss the question, is the study of metaphysics possible and what do we gain from studying or practicing it? Kant evaluates this question by discussing what distinguishes metaphysics from other natural sciences and mathematics. The many sections of this book explore this discussion and provide the necessary arguments to solve this question. Kant comes to a conclusion on the study of metaphysics and ultimately determines that it is a form of pseudoscience, and does not provide us with knowledge. This conclusion challenges the previous understanding and teachings of philosophers of the “school metaphysics” including teachings of Baumgarten.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, neither has been found truer than the other. Essentially, there is no right or wrong answer. Based on modern scientific views, some may believe that Hume’s ideas have the edge over Descartes. However it does seem ironic considering that Descartes believed that knowledge was only gained through logic and scientific method. His very methods were in turn used against him to prove that his ideas on human understanding have been used to debunk his ideas about…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As time passes, knowledge becomes more complex and philosophers start to develop different theories regarding how people come about this knowledge. There is a distinct difference between both Rationalism and Empiricism and both Descartes and Locke have found ways to discredit and support both views. Descartes argument towards Rationalism is much stronger than Hume's argument towards Empiricism. There is quite the distinction between both empiricism and rationalism. The major difference between rationalism and empiricism concerns their knowledge basis.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays