Grubb and Bennett pointed out that as a result, agencies may lack the fundamental awareness of trafficking definitions and signs of victimization. The primary core to finding victims going unnoticed can determine the situation to solve the issue (489). Grubb and Bennett show various surveys among many Georgia law enforcements if their agencies have a fundamental training. The question Grubb and Bennett pointed out “[measures] the amount of human trafficking training during the last four years” (493). The result was a phenomenon because most agencies by 75% have shown no training while the rest consisted of quartered percentage had either taken the training programs or unknown (493). The reason 75% of law enforcement did not receive the training is because many have lacked the official procedure to address human …show more content…
government and the activist citizen. Todd Melby describes that the U.S. government makes many changes to increase the awareness throughout their borders (4). Not only that, but the government also issues an aid supports to the victims and give full U.S. citizenship if the victims are foreign (6). Giving a better care may soothe the victims, but it is not enough. Willoughby Mariano argues that the “government officials have created programs that promise to find and help victims, but too often don’t” (Mariano). A government official may have too many things on hand to be able to promise to solve this issue. However, with this current issue in the rise, human trafficking still occurs and continues scheming their plan to target vulnerable