In my opinion the Con article has a weaker argument. All things she put in the article were options you are able to fix with time. She also mentioned a big problem was "Human Error". This would make the Pro's article even more strong because it would say these driver less cars are more safe than an unpredictable human. Some things I would add into this article would be some more examples of these "driver less" cars making mistakes while driving because of some unknown obstacle. Another detail I would add in would be how inconvenient it would be to "refuel" these cars instead of just stopping at a gas station to fill up real quick.
