Identifying Human Cooperation

Better Essays
Psychological Identification and Understanding of Human Cooperation
Using a variety of studies, research strategies, and available data collected from different sources to define along with understand the complexity of human cooperation. Pointing out the problems in human cooperation; individuals deciding to work alone rather than in a group. Determining what factors causes dilemmas in human cooperation or in some instances leading to competition. Comparing and/or contrasting already existing research and arguments from a psychological perspective pertaining to this form of human communication. Considering different psychological reasoning’s as to how cooperation is beneficial to the individuals involved any why it is not done when the time
…show more content…
These activities help the group build social norms, learn how to act in social situations, can interpret others intentions through facial expressions, with an ability to communicate through vocal, facial, and non-vocal way (Argyle, 1991). Even though, cooperation may have derived from non-primates and other animals another way it came about is through kin selection. Kin selection suggest that cooperation derived from a strong tendency to help and treat one owns kin in a very wide range of circumstances (Dunbar e, 2001). Cooperation stimmed from the willingness to provide and help close relatives during times of need rather than individuals not of family dissent (Dunbar et al., 2001). With these explanations on how cooperation occurred; Griffin and Patton introduced another theory. Griffin and Patton cooperation was formed to overcome communication barriers/gaps between different groups of people. To narrow these gaps, we start accepting and in some cases adopting others ways, attitudes, and beliefs (Griffin & Patton, 1986). In return our cognitive dissonance will reduce in response of the new behaviors we picked up from the group. This allows all viewpoint to be voiced and understood with the intentions of resolving conflicts between the members of the group. Considering that, cooperation was built off the notation that the …show more content…
The desire to maximize rewards and minimize cost to the individuals involved causes conformity to happen; makes it easier to cooperate. Conformity is one of the two major ways that can influence group cooperation (Griffin & Patton, 1986). Brown book information page 140-142. Even though, cooperation seems easily obtained social dilemmas are as easy to develop. With conflict between an individual’s personal or selfish interests and the interests of the group (Tyler, 2011). Leading to the fundamental effects on how we think and act in any social situation that requires cooperation (Axelrod, 1984). When cooperation occurs, all members must be willing to effectively aid one another. If this criterion is not met it often lead to conflict, because one or more of the group members are invested only to benefit themselves. Axelrod determined this was due to the Prisoner’s Dilemma (1984). If agreed upon cooperation this strategy used to determine how much effort a person will put into cooperation based on how much effort received from the other members involved along with how trustworthy they are. In a way, we think about if we should cooperate with others to gain something verses getting cheated and gain

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Joe Tanney can enhance the team work by addressing the differences that are causing the division. He should have used both the direct and indirect strategies of managing the conflicts. The most appropriate indirect method would be accommodation. Since all members seem to be holding different opinions and there are differences, Joe should enhance accommodation in order to minimize the conflicts. A more direct strategy would be collaboration.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Direct, indirect and through network. Direct reciprocity is observed through members that share unrelated cooperative genes. Based on these individuals on can infer whether or not it is better to cooperate or defect the other person. This encounter is analyzed through a theoretic game called, Prisoners Dilemma conducted by Axelrod, 1984. A strategy of tic-for-tac where members consequently measure what will be beneficial to them in the long run.…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People will tend to know more and better about someone they new meet (strangers) with the effort of trying to reduce the uncertainty towards others. According to Berger and Calabrese (1975), they said that it is normal for people to exchange information between each others because it is a basic human function in order to reduce uncertainty. They also mentioned that reducing of uncertainty are the main motive and key step of interpersonal communication. The general purpose of studying uncertainty reduction theory can help people to understand human relationship in interpersonal communication. Basically, every person experience with the confront of uncertainty whereas in initial encounters, new…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Empathy involves listening objectively to the needs of other people in a group and exercising emotional intelligence. Empathy should not be mistaken for sympathy. While sympathy involves making the other person feel better, empathy takes into consideration other compounding factors to a situation. The trait helps to build trust with followers which in turn strengthens relationships and improves productivity. Leaders who truly listen to varied opinions and enable followers to forge forward toward solutions without controlling them are influential and can command commitment easily.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Global Teamwork Essay

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Higashi harsh attitude in communication is stern and abrupt where Kelly is fickle and timed. Communication is very important when dealing with other cultures especially in leadership. As a leader one must be able to be open and understand the differences taking in the fact that both parties view point are different culturally but should be disgusted and work through the miscommunication. It is coming together as a team that allows open communication, shared values which leads to team cohesion. As stated by Daft (2011) “Leaders encourage people to expand their minds and abilities and to assume responsibilities for their own action.” Every culture can bring different value and ideas it allowing others to ability to learn of each other expectations especially in the negotiation process.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups Introduction 1. Introducing the background and general idea about factors that facilitate cooperation a. Reputation systems and cooperation i. Past research has found that awareness of the possibility that one’s actions (reputation) can be communicated to others facilitates cooperation as the individual is less inclined to act selfishly ii. An individual’s reputation allows others to select those who are more cooperative and who might be better partners iii.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lastly, collaborating is everyone listening to each other, and coming up with a solution together. I think depending on the situation and who the conflict is with, determines the response/conflict handling style…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The diversity of the group can play an integral role when conflict occurs. It is important that a leader manage conflict effectively to alleviate if from spinning out of control. It can be assumed that from the previous information, transformational leaders can be more effective in conflict management due to the notion that they interact on an emotional level. Ayoko et al. suggests that “leaders must manage team members’ emotions during conflicts in order to avoid the development of negative group emotional history” (Ayoko & Konrad, 2012, p. 696).…

    • 1593 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Group Leadership Summary

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Conflict may first begin when developing the group. Conflict typically evolves due to personality differences or role disagreements. Listening with empathy can resolve the personality differences. Role conflicts can be handled by being aware of the assumptions you may bring to the table. Conflict is best handled by dealing with the issues at hand, instead of avoiding it.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Principal-agent (PA) scholars usually focus on the difficulty with getting agents to expend more effort, known as the moral hazard problem. Even though agents and principals may share a common goal, agents have personal incentives to increase their own self-interests. These incentives can lead to tension between the goals of the principal and the execution of the task by the agents (Miller 2005). Agents may prefer to shirk and consequently the principal will suffer. PA scholars may argue that implementation varies because of the amount of effort agents expend.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays