Circumstances To Take The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
We are creatures who differently appreciate life. We value living and being around the world. We want to be involved in this universe, we want to love, we want to have a routine, we want to do the best we can, we want to accomplish our dreams, and to be successful. Life obviously means that you are existing and involved in this world. You have the capacity to breathe, react, understand, and feel what is around you. It means that your brain is aware of the dilemmas in the world, the difference between the good and the bad. We always search for happiness, relationships, improvements, experience, finance, stability, and entertainment. It is undoubtedly illegal and immoral to take a life. Nevertheless, there are some circumstances that might allow you to take life. According to Google Translate: “Circumstances are an event or fact that cause or help to cause something to happen, typically something undesirable”. Circumstances are beyond human control, they may force you to do bad things, such as taking life. Self-defense or defending your family’s, friends’s lives, is one of the most popular cases that occurs to the world. Thus, if you are saving another’s life and there is no …show more content…
If a criminal murders a victim, the criminal must go through the death penalty process after guilt has been proven by court. Punishing criminals can prevent other criminals from committing crimes, by enforcing and showing the consequences of murder, nonetheless execution will not necessarily stop the crime of murder. Yet it will assuredly diminish crimes. For instance, in Islam; the punishment of murder unquestionably is public execution. It is only to show the public that if you commit murder, this is your sanction. And the results show that murder in Islamic countries is rare, so it is morally obligated to execute the criminals after has proven guilt to prevent crimes, but if there are no consequences then murder mightn 't be deterred by the justice

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty The Death penalty is a highly controversial topic in present day politics. The public is concerned with how America’s most dangerous criminals are held responsible for their crimes as well as how they will be kept from harming others. It’s reasonable to want a mass murderer to be punished in a manner that removes further threat, but is it our place to decide if his or her life should be ended? In other words, is it moral for society to prescribe murder as retribution for murder?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life is a very broad, difficult topic to speak about. Often times, people have conflicting thoughts on what they think the value of life is, what the point of life is, or what life is really supposed to mean. Should it be based off of materialistic possessions? Should who a person is or what they do with their life define them? Or should humans simply live as they desire and not put a price tag on another person until after they are dead?…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A soldier can prepare himself for war, but no one can for the truth about what one will discover about themselves. Life consists not preparing for when things go in one's favor, but instead prepare for those days in which they…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On December 11th, 1962 the last two people were executed under Canadian law. Two men were hanged, which was the only method of capital punishment enforced in Canadian history (Setaram, 2015). One of the men, named Ronald Turpin, was convicted of killing a cop. The other, named Arthur Lucas, was convicted for murder. After these two trials in 1976, capital punishment was abolished.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Jeffrey Dahmer was a notorious serial killer and known cannibal who raped, murdered, and dismembered his victims. Instead of facing retributive punishment for his crimes, he was sentenced to multiple life terms and was later killed by an inmate. A person who has taken the life of another purposely and premeditated deserves to face the punishment of death under law. Executing a criminal who murdered another human being offers a way of retribution to the loved ones of the victim because even though they cannot change what has happened or have their loved one back, by seeing justice be served it assures to them that there will be no other victims and families who face the same tragedy, giving them some closure.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In Texas

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty does not act as a deterrent any better than other punishments. If it did, death penalty states would have lower rates of murder than non-death penalty states. This is not the case. The death penalty is hugely expensive.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrianne Haslet-Davis writes such a vivid recognition of enforcing the death penalty by the use of deterrence. She focuses on an individual story, hers being coming close to death. She goes on and on about if any individuals was murdered the life of the murderer should be also. The community tends to always use punishments to put down criminals from their cruel and heinous actions. However, with our crime rates so high, it's plain up simple that the smartest punishment for any murderer should be execution.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Haag, a sociologist, wrote an extensive explanation on why the death penalty would help deter criminals from committing crimes. He has stated that the death penalty may be the only way to keep some people from committing crimes. He has said that this will help reduce the number of victims to crimes such as murder and rape. Haag also feels that if the punishments for a crime is raised then the desire to commit a crime is quickly diminished. I agree with Haag.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty does not deter crime. It is viewed as inhumane and barbaric. Some argue that all human life is sacred. Some argue that the death penalty goes against every organized…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two distinguished social and political philosophers take opposing positions in this highly engaging work. Louis P. Pojman justifies the practice of execution by appealing to the principle of retribution, we deserve to be rewarded and punished according to the virtue or viciousness of our actions. He asserts that the death penalty does deter some potential murderers and that we risk the lives of innocent people who might otherwise live if we refuse to execute those deserving that punishment. Jeffrey Reiman argues that although the death penalty is a just punishment for murder, we are not morally obliged to execute murderers. Since we lack conclusive evidence that executing murderers is an effective deterrent and because we can foster the advance…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Death Penalty laws were first mentioned in the Code of Hammurabi, dating back to 1700 BC. Numerous different empires and countries used the death penalty for consequences of crime. Although many countries began to abolish the death penalty, the United States did not. During the colonial era is when the United States first began using Capital Punishment.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Australia should not have the death penalty for people who commit murder. Do you think Australia should have a death penalty? Well, I certainly don't. I believe we shouldn't have a death penalty in Australia because it can lead to people paying for crimes they did not commit also it does not prevent crimes and people have the right to live. As they say, 2 wrongs don't make a right.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If an individual's quality of life is terrible, they should have the right to stop suffering.” Many people live unhappy knowing that what they have is incurable. If assisted suicide is legal they can choose to do it and die in a peaceful way instead of waiting for their final day to come while they still suffer. People may also agree with this topic do to the “Pain and anguish of the patient's family and friends” which can be lessened, and they can say their final goodbyes.”…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I heard the sirens as I ran upstairs. My old dog was found dead in my grandparents backyard in his doghouse. My grandfather told me people beat the dog up because he was always howling at night. Is killing another justifiable? No, because killing one another is not a justifiable act.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is my own personal philosophy paper where I will be talking about views on life, health, illness, attitudes, beliefs related to death and dying, experiences and attitudes towards grief and bereavement, importance of culture on death and dying, and expectations of health professionals. I will talk about how my own life experiences have affected me in each of these categories. Everyone is exposed to different surrounding and situations. Other 's handle situations, or issues in their own way. It is time to see what I have been exposed to and how I have acted upon these issues.…

    • 2074 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics