Human Beings Should Extend The Fundamental Principle Of Equal Consideration

1134 Words Nov 28th, 2016 5 Pages
In modern culture, human beings treat animals in ways termed as wrongful if meted out on them. People kill animals for consumption, cage them at will and even use them to conduct numerous experiments (Steinbock 1). Treating animals indifferently is morally incorrect. According to philosopher Peter Singer, no real difference between humans and non-humans justifies animal mistreatment. This is because humans evolved from animals. This single element clearly points out the fact that human beings similarly are animals. Singer believes that the greatest outcomes of any undertaking often cause people to experience abundant pleasure or minimum pain (Singer 4). In his opinion, human beings should extend the fundamental principle of equal consideration of interests to other non-human species. This is because no actual evidence enunciates that animals cannot experience happiness or feel pain. To elucidate his argument on extending equal consideration, Singer first tackles the popular notion that animals are the first species. Often, humans mistreat animals based on the assertion that animals are less intelligent creatures. People believe that the lack of intelligence in animals makes them morally irresponsible. In this regard, humans deem it morally appropriate for them to make everyday decisions that govern the livelihood of animals. Although animals lack certain capabilities possessed by human beings that may necessitate different treatment, this single fact does not justify the…

Related Documents