Hugo Adam Bedau's Arguement

Improved Essays
Hugo Adam Bedau states that “most of us believe that it is not morally wrong and may even be our moral duty to use violence to prevent aggression” (738.) I firmly agree with this concept. In the case of self defense I would use violence against the individual causing harm to me. Would I go the extent of killing the person who was trying to kill me? The answer to that statement is: I do not know. Honestly, I would try every option available to me before killing the individual, but at the end of the day… whatever happens will happen. In the heat of the moment anything could occur. Bedau mentions, the statement “a life for life” (741.) This got me to thinking about how dumbfounded and idiotic that phrase is. I know Bedau would agree with me on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ofc Lazic responded to 1818 N Mansard Blvd to speak with the complainant (Christian Belcher) about an altercation he just had with his wife (Cynthia Belcher). Upon arrival, I spoke with Christian who was holding his juvenile child. Christian states that the argument began over his apartment being in disarray. Christian states that their apartment has not been cleaned for some time not. Christian states that he is not able to clean the apartment because he has to watch their son.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Benet’s Argument, Argumentative Essay When Stephen Vincent Benet said “We have no reason to hold Salem up to the obloquy.” He means to say we have not come far from Salem and need to improve. Michael Donald, an African American male, beaten, killed, and then hung from a tree in 1981. That was only 37 years ago, and to know that people were still being hung for the color of their skin, Benet’s argument is not too far from the truth.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The home in which citizens reside in is referred to as a “castle”, where the King and/or Queen must defend their grounds. From English Common Law, laws were derived to protect those who owned a home from defenseless harm or injury. Such laws, often referred to as “Castle Doctrine” or “stand-your-ground” laws, justify the harmful force of killing as a means of defense. Castle Doctrine laws inevitably pose a thought of linked homicide, where these laws allow citizens to legally commit homicide. Arguably, homicide is the unlawful killing with intention, where citizens are aware of the harm at hand.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has been a topic of contention since it was introduced among humankind. The two sides of this issue are either for or against it. There are many solid points between the two disagreeing parties that need to be explored to make an informed decision on which side you would choose to support. Two essays I will draw from in this writing are written by Edward Koch, who is for, and David Bruck, who is against it. Both parties have made excellent points in their writings and will be great avenues to explore while making your decision.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will argue that it is permissible to kill a villainous aggressor, an innocent aggressor, and an innocent threat, but not an innocent bystander. According to Judith Jarvis Thompson, it is morally permissible for person A to kill person B in self-defense if and only if (1) B will kill A unless A kills B, and (2) if B kills A, the B will violate A ’s right that B not kill A (Handout #16). The villainous aggressor is someone who is intentionally trying to kill you and who is morally responsible for trying (Handout #16).…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hugo Bedau supports 5 arguments against death penalty in his writing, The Case Against the Death Penalty. He has been a leading philosophical critic of capital punishment, making him a good source for this topic. Badau starts with his first argument: Capital Punishment is not a deterrent to capital crimes. Capital punishment is being used as a deterrent for crime because if people know that certain actions result to death by punishment, they are less likely to commit the crime. Badau argues, "A punishment can be an effective deterrent only if it is consistently and promptly employed.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Maus I by Art Spiegelman, the act of Vladek murdering the German soldier proves what is wrong is not always wrong by being an act of self-defense and an obligation. Society, as a whole, believes that murder is immoral. However, in this situation of Maus, Vladek considers his life threatened. Being in the middle of a war, Vladek considers survival his most important goal. At this moment, if he does not kill the soldier, the soldier might attempt to murder him.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For those whom like to act as if they were God and take a life intentionally deserves to be punished. In fact, other than God whom can punish someone are the jails and prison that house these types of individuals. There are some cold blooded killers out in the world, along with some individuals whom are not mentally able to make conscious delinquent actions. In fact these types of people become inmates inside of correctional institutions that are housed in supermax sanctions have prompted arguments regarding people are for or against the death penalty, the bans on executions on the mentally retarded and juveniles are also addressed. Giving that this world is filled with a very mixed cultural background of all kinds of human beings.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary John Arthurs has a unique stance on world hunger and moral obligation and the way that we should handle these issues. He opens up his argument by analyzing one of Pete Singers rules “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it. “(666) Arthur believes that rule of life is a flawed one. He counters this statement by giving a scenario using Singers moral rule. Arthur states “All of us could help others by giving away or allowing others to use our bodies.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial topic which receives a great deal of criticism from parties on both sides of the argument. Some suggest that it is morally sound on the basis of an eye-for-an-eye ideology, while others argue that its inherent hypocrisy makes the act illegitimate. By examining and analyzing Igor Primoratz’s A Life for a Life and its argument in support of the death penalty, I will attempt to both explain and discredit his argument on the grounds that murder ought not justify murder. Igor Primoratz’s central argument is that there is no equivalent punishment to murder, which is why in cases of murder, the death penalty is justified. Simply imprisoning someone who committed such a heinous crime as murder does not equate…

    • 1621 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial subject with plenty of opponents and supporters. The supporters of the death penalty make the argument that there are some criminals that as long as they are alive they’re a danger to everybody else. The opponents of the death penalty say that a judge and a jury shouldn’t be able to decide whether or not a person should live or die. Whether or not the death penalty is a fair and just punishment for criminals has been something that has been disputed ever since the death penalty was created. One of the death penalties supporters is Ernest Van Den Haag.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pierre Bourdieu, in Distinction, explains taste and preference between different social classes and education levels. He argues that taste is not pure and what we find aesthetically pleasing, and what we appreciate, in terms of art and literature, are directly connected to how people are raised and the way they are educated. Bourdieu is right in saying that literature and the study of art legitimizes social divisions in terms that those who can afford to receive a higher education will be able to understand and value it on a finer level. However, there are ways to promote more egalitarian ends, although it may be difficult. Pierre Bourdieu points out that taste shows class because, “taste classifies and it classifies the classifier” (1669).…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Vaillant's Argument Essay

    • 1095 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article, Vaillant illustrates how one of the men they followed during the study always managed to deal with bad experiences and was one of the best examples of good mental health in the entire study. When this individual was young his mother left with his father’s best friend and his reaction was that this had just happened the same way things happen in movies. This young man also went to war because his father wanted him to be a doctor, so he decided to go against his father’s wish and he joined the army. After he came back from war, he graduated, got married and had a strong relationship with his wife and kids. Vaillant wrote to him to ask him what his secret was because he had always ranked among the best examples of good mental…

    • 1095 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On October 13th, 1982, around 1:15 A.M. we arrived at the home of the Volupides. When we arrived, We saw Arthur Volupides laying on the ground dead. He lay with his feet on the second and third step. He held a glass in his left hand, wore a neat tuxedo, and a robe over the tuxedo. Mrs. Volupides is wearing a fancy dress, a lot of jewelry, and had been cooking.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays