Federalist 51 Essay

Improved Essays
Federalist Paper

Today, the federal system is a good for large country because it is good for promoting the common good of individual then protecting individual rights just like the federalist wanted to this system to be. The United States is a big country and has many states, so it needs a big government to control all of the states and give all people their rights. In 1787, the federalist wanted a stronger central government and to give the center the government supreme power and make it more powerful than power of states rather than Anti- federalist who wanted the power of states to be stronger than the central government. When the U.S 13 colonies decelerated independence from the Great of Britain, the new U.S. government formed and made
…show more content…
The federalist #51 idea of having departments of government that insures checks and balances each other in contusion’s system. The structure of the government have branch and each branch oversea the other, and is a great idea as mentioned in the federalist # 51. The US president is a head of the executive, and he has power to prevent the legislature from becoming too powerful, and if the president misuse his power the other branches can impeach him. So legislature and executive can keep each other in check. Anti-federalist#1 idea was to make the power of the government in the hand of the states more than the power of the central government. Only small states support Anit-federalist because they want to make decision by themselves. Unlike the assumptions of the anti-federalists, the federal system did not take all the rights form the states but in reality gave them most of the decision making right that make the states have right to raise the tax to get more money, but the supreme law of the land is the constitution make sure that the union is the most powerful thing in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Despite the fact that the Constitution was written based on Federalist theories, it still allowed some power to rest only in the hands of the state government. This made American citizens content in the United States’ newly established…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 51 Summary

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James Madison wrote the Federalist Paper No. 51 specifically to explain to the readers how this new government makes liberty possible. He explains the various checks and balances that have been placed in order to ensure that not one specific branch would have too much power. The Federalist appeared in many different New York newspapers such as The New York Journal and The Daily Advertiser. The Federalist essays were written as responses to the many antifederalist opinions against the Constitution and they were originally intended to be only twenty essays long but were instead continued due to the continued criticisms of the Constitution.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism in the constitution helps guard against tyranny by giving neither the state or central government enough power to tyrannize. According to Doc. A, “James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788”, “power...is first divided between two distinct governments” Also in the Venn diagram on Doc A neither the state or local government possesses all the power. They either have to share a power or only one side gets that certain power. This helps guard against tyranny because it is preventing the central or local government from holding all power.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carmelo Figueroa Per. 4 November 2, 2017 How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? Tyranny is one of the reasons that governments have gone to anarchy; People have rebelled and started riots or even wars due to the oppression of tyranny. The founding fathers of America wanted a government that was strong, but not too strong.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were many ways that the constitution guarded against tyranny. In 1787 ,fifty five delegates met in philadelphia to fix the articles of confederation. They decided to make a new government, called the constitution, that prevented tyranny. Tyranny is a noun that means a cruel or oppressive government or rule. The constitution prevents dictatorship and tyranny in four ways: federalism, separation of power, small states vs. large states compromise, and checks and balances system.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist papers were written in attempt to get citizens to ratify the United States Constitution in 1787, and more specifically the citizens of New York. Eighty-five essays made up the Federalist papers. When citizens were reviewing the United States Constitution the Federalists papers basically guided them through it and helped people to understand how the Constitution should be interpreted as well as where the ideas came from. In the first paper we were assigned, Federalist number 10, James Madison argued that if you wanted a satisfactory economy the Partisan democracy is not the best idea to get that.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the ratification of the Constitution of 1787, the Articles of Confederation gave most of the power to the states. However, the Federalists wanted the national government to hold the majority of the power and not the states. They were in favor of limiting the power of the states. They did not believe a Bill of Rights was necessary because the state constitutions should protect the individual rights. Federalists believed that the best way to protect their rights was through a large republic.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists felt that states were free agents that should manage their own revenue and spend their money as they saw fit, while the Federalists felt that many individual and different fiscal and monetary policies led to economic…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists had the better argument overall because they had clear instances showing how a strong central government could become corrupt and lose interest in its citizens. They wanted the power to stay in the states because it would allow more control over what was happening within the nation and it would give citizens more protected rights. In the end, after several debates between the groups, they agreed on creating the Bill of Rights, which gave the citizens protected rights. In addition, they agreed on forming one central government that was made up of three branches, all with restricted powers because of the checks and balances between them.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would allow for the government to do things that aren't listed within the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were opposed to this. They wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Some examples of Anti-Federalists are George Mason and John Hancock. Anti-Federalists by definition are a political party that wanted the power of the individual state to be greater than the power of the central government, and a strict interpretation of the constitution promoted this.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays