Later, Reagan says, “Girls termed "sexually active” -- and that has replaced the word “promiscuous”-- are given help in order to prevent illegitimate births or abortion.” (paragraph 16) Because Reagan is throwing in a thought of his, he is using the device of Parenthesis. Parenthesis is a word, clause, or sentence inserted as an explanation or afterthought into a passage that is grammatically complete without it, in writing usually marked off by curved brackets, dashes, or commas. He does this by simply throwing in a short phrase in the middle of his sentence to say that, as a country, we don’t look at sex as something moral.…
In the persuasive article by Scott Anderson, the rhetor puts together an argument using the six components, Exordium, narration, partition, confirmation, refutation, and conclusion. He claims that minors should not be put into the adult system yet he strives more for people to ponder the situation at a much higher level of thinking. The exordium is used to grab the attention of the audience and show he is worth listening to. Since it is a difficult case, Anderson must use an insinuation. The insinuation is needed to ease a hostile audience into listening.…
Howard Zinn’s book was more reasonable, due to the fact that it gives information about the bad things that happened to the United States. His story explains what Christopher Columbus has done. Columbus wanted the Arawaks to be his slaves because of how built they are, they cut themselves for ignorance, and Columbus notice that their weapons were not made of iron. The book by Larry Schweikart and Michael Allen explains of how great the United States is, but do not know what kind of violence that occurred and gave the United States a lot of items. Zinn explains what Christopher Columbus did to trick the Arawak.…
David Conlin is a Senior at BYU-Idaho, his major is communications with an emphasis in advertising, his expected graduation date is December 2016. David is from Bay Area, California and enjoys speaking in third person, short walks along the beach, wearing indifferent expressions in portrait photography, and has a very real evolutionary fear of sharks.…
Due to the Confederation government’s inability to collect taxes from the states, one of the most effective ways for states to pay their debts was to give up their western land holdings to the national government. Therefore, North Carolina, in 1783, gave up their western lands that are now known as East Tennessee. Settlers flooded this area as a new chance. When the land was finally ceded to the national government, the settlers and speculators kept their private property rights in the region.…
Historians in the academic field may disagree with each and many not always come agree in something, however, they need to have consensus in finding out what is really…
Some history events are essential evidences that illustrate ideas of how the event begins and ends. Some historians take a time to write books and articles about important events to demonstrate deep details that readers may not know about. Many historians have constructed an event to their own ideological beliefs to infiltrate those beliefs to the readers. Moreover, a Presidential history or a biography topic can be constructed with a lot of interpretations that results in arguments and delegations between historians. Robert Dallek wrote Flawed Giant Lyndon Johnson and his time 1961-1973.…
A 7-2 majority ruled on the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford, citing a wide variety of constitutional grounds for support. One of the weakest arguments of this case was the argument for Dred Scott not being able to be classified as a citizen. As a result, he was not subject to the full right of freedoms and due process of law. Taney wrote that slaves lacked sovereignty and that they were not intended to be included by the framers of the Constitution (5). He writes that slaves were actually, “intended to be excluded from it.”…
The motive for that is safety, because the historian who breaks the pattern causes stares and suspicions.” (Zinn, n.d. , p. 59) If the information we are given is always following a certain pattern how are we supposed to grow and most importantly have a solid conception of the…
Clifford and James are two philosophers who have contradicting opinions on whether having sufficient evidence is always necessary to believe in something. Where Clifford believes you cannot believe in anything without sufficient evidence, James believes that if the evidence doesn’t point in one way or another, it is justified to believe something based on our will. I will be arguing that James’ side is indeed correct. In James’ paper, he provides concrete evidence as to why his opinion is correct.…
The Supreme Court, as Justice Madison puts it, is the Supreme interpreter of the law, and all laws that are not constitutional must be strike down. Brandeis also thinks this way. He thinks the interpreter of the law has supervisory powers. They must be impartial and not allow a citizen or government official to break the law. If citizens break the law, then the appropriate punishment applies according to the statutes; however, if the government breaks the law, then sanctions applies to uphold the integrity of the law.…
Arguments are constantly seen throughout each day. They are made on the news, in advertisements, and by professors. The choice weather to believe these arguments being made depends heavily on the argument’s ethos. Jeff Lliff gave a TED Talk about sleep and what the brain is doing during sleep. Each argument Lliff made was believable because of the ethos involved.…
Many events ranging from wars to elections have influenced American history as the American public knows today. Even though these events have been set in stone and are in-erasable from America’s past, they can be interpreted in a vast multitude of ways. There are also always two sides of a story, and one cannot fully develop an opinion on a specific topic without having knowledge that pertains to each side. With this in mind, it is only logical to apply a comparison between Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States and Larry Schweikart’s a Patriot’s History of the United States. More specifically, the difference in American foreign policy on the Vietnam War.…
The debate between E.H. Carr and G.R. Elton signifies the conflict between the “Old School” of historical studies and the Revisionist model. Carr proposes that there exists within historical studies the need for interpretation, and that there is no such thing as a universalized “truth” or “fact”. This is evocative of the Postmodernist phenomenon to critique and rethink approaches to history, which I will discuss later in this paper. Elton, on the other hand, emphasizes the universal “truth” within historical studies. He insists that there is no such thing as “subjectivity”, and all facts within historical sources are indeed just that – facts.…
In fact, while making a reputation about someone, we must be objective by not engaging our feelings and opinions and act like detectives, examining people’s motivations and assumptions while describing others, we must not judge anyone; therefore, we should also suspect our own motives. That is how historian must work to avoid being judgmental and subjective,…