In his op-ed, David Brooks uses logos to support his argument that children of affluent parents are advantaged when compared to children of low-income families. Brooks cites that more affluent and educated parents are able to “breast-feed their babies at much higher rates… and for much longer” time than less educated parents, they “spend two to three times more time with their preschool children than less affluent parents,” and they have increased “education expenditures…by almost 300 percent,” compared to the spending of less affluent families, which has relatively flatlined. All of these statistics point out the discrepancies in the care …show more content…
By using multiple argument types he appeals to both the logic and emotions of the reader and makes his point clear, credible, and compelling. Hopefully his essay inspires readers to take action to combat the inequalities that children face in the education and employment systems in the United