How Was The Union Victory In The Civil War Inevitable

Good Essays
The statement “Union Victory In The Civil War Was Inevitable” is faulty because the North has more power, heavy-duty guns, and has a well-balanced leadership. The South had it better; they knew their surroundings, had a great leader and could have been two steps ahead if they thought logically. What that means is if the South just used their heads instead of jumping into battle the entire time, they could have thought their way out of this instead of losing to the Union. The Union saw this advantage and took it and used it against the Confederacy. Union victory was inevitable because of how the Confederacy just jumped to battle without thinking and how the union won with the Confederacy big disadvantage against them.

The Union had a lot of advantages against the Confederacy and this was way the Union won because the Union thought long and hard about their attacks while the South took it as bait. Confederacy won the first battles repeatedly; they couldn't have gone on because of the fact that the Union had a greater population. The Union was also industrialized, so making weapons and obtaining supplies was easy. The Confederacy had only a small amount of soldiers even though the best military schools were located
…show more content…
This could've made Washington, DC completely surrounded by the Confederacy (Maryland and Virginia) and Lincoln would've either surrendered or he would have moved north and proclaimed New York or Philadelphia or even Boston as his capital. Kentucky and Missouri were very vital for either side in order to win the war. With these two states in the Union's hands, it was clear that the Union was having the upper hand. The border states were joining the Confederacy; the European powers would've been far more encouraged to recognize the Confederate States of America. Europeans seeking potential meant an unlimited supply of military

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Lee's Argumentative Essay

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Obviously, Lee was not the only person responsible for the Reconstruction. Grant and Lincoln also had a large part in making Appomattox go smoothly. And Appomattox did not mark the end of the Civil War, as Johnston still had a significant army fighting in North Carolina. But Lee’s ability to accept defeat for the good of the country kept America from falling apart. If it were not for Lee, America easily could have become a terrible, unstable battlefield, similar to modern war-torn countries such as Syria or Cambodia.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This battle convinced the Lincoln administration and the North that the Civil War would be a long costly affair . The first Battle of Bull Run is more significant than the second one. Despite the forewarning of the Confederate forces the union was still able to capitalize upon initial advantages. During this battle, it was the first time the Confederates lost a commander during war. Thus, in the first battle the union won the overall American Civil War, even though the union lost during the Second Battle of Bull…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It was a turning point for the Southerners because they fought as the underdog and their first major victory against the stronger unit gave them hope. It also struck the Northerners because they waltzed into battle thinking there would be minimal if any bloodshed but the Southerners proved their strength and commitment. This event was momentous in American history because it was the second time the underdogs won against an imperial power. The first was the American Revolution against the almighty British nation. The British were ensured to win but the Americans pulled through and gained their independence.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sherman once blurted out to a fellow officer: "I am a damned sight smarter than Grant; I know a great deal more about war, military history, strategy and grand tactics than he does....” (Military Leadership of North and South) Sherman recognized that the Northern military leaders were smarter and knew what it would take to win the Civil war. The Northern leaders were smart enough to prohibit freedom of speech and other liberties to keep the soldiers obedient and disciplined. They won the war due to the superiority of the Northern leaders and their ability to suspend certain liberties, the advantage that allowed the little guy to win in the past, that the South…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Civil War The fight between the Confederate and the Union created a war that defines the United States as a union today. Many historians argue that President Abraham Lincoln was overstepping his boundaries by going against the third amendment by beginning a war between States. Contrary to their beliefs, the war between the Union and the Confederate needed to happen to keep the United States together. Although the Union won the war, the laws, punishments, economy affected the civilians, soldiers and even the free slaves in a negative way. To begin with, the North is justified in invading the South to protect the Union.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Be careful not to write in first person and use words such as (I) A few of the causes of the first world war like imperialism and nationalism had the most significant impact in the beginning of World War 1, and others like alliances had the least impact on World War 1. Nationalism had influenced politics greatly with ethnic groups resenting domination by others and longed for their nations to become independent. Imperialism cause nations to fight over land and resources, leading to nations to resort to expand their arms. Lastly, the Alliance System was useful, yet compared with the other causes of the first war, alliances don’t fair well. The Alliance System didn’t last long and only came into effect until after the…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If a dominant European power such as England had acknowledged the Confederacy or, even worse, started to help the Confederate State militarily, the strategic embodiment would have been greatly adapted and the US might have had to make peace. Lastly, this battle was the first significant defeat of Gen. Robert E. Lee. Up until that time, he was seen by many in the North and South as indestructible. His defeat was good for morale in the North and helped convince the North that the war could be…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He worked tirelessly at ending slavery and did it ever so strategically and fairly that to argue against him being the strongest president listed would be absurd. Strength is defined as "the quality or state of being strong, in particular", this definition can be taken in many ways. In this situation, strength is being discussed as a characteristic of someone's personality. Meaning, that person is strong in how they act, lead, and believe. Lincoln displayed this by using tactics no one expected to help support his cause when he was the underdog.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Lincoln praised Thomas Jefferson for elevating human rights over property rights.” [Text pg. 431] Even though at this time war in America brought upon death in gruesomely massive numbers, Lincoln felt that the war was inevitable and action had to be taken in one way or another. “Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.” [Lincoln…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He learned through this that he was going to have to take a more active role in the war than he had anticipated. President Lincoln took on a new role in 1862 of learning how to really fight a war. He started studying war and strategy. He began to seek guidance from his advisers. “He requested information as to the location of forces, their state of readiness, and the levels of arms and ammunition they held… He would never again adhere to the position that a passive containment strategy would suffice to bring the Confederates to their sense and win the war.” (McGovern 2009) By adjusting the Union’s tactics the chances of winning the war was looking much better.…

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays