Ever heard of the Mexican Robin Hood? And if his assassination was unjustified or justified? Well the assassination of Pancho Villa was justified because Obregon (Alvaro Obregon was a general) and Villa both made an agreement but Villa then broke the agreement. The agreement was that Villa would not join the Mexican politics. Villa joined either way because Mexico at the time was in need of a new president. With Villa joining the Mexican politics, he became to be a threat towards Obregon.
Due to the fact, Obregon got mad because Villa broke the agreement they had about him retiring and not joining the Mexican politics. Addition to that Villa did everything for his people. His people loved him. They reason why Villa broke the agreement was …show more content…
Obregon knew that people follow and support Villa. Villa was like a hero to his people. Not only, but also Obregon knew that Villa had a lot of supporters on his side and is why he told him to not get involved in the election, because he knew a lot of people would have followed him and vote for him. Pancho did not listen to Obregon because he knew that he couldn’t be trusted. With the result of that he got involved. That is what got Obregon mad and was probably the reason why he ordered the assassination.
In other hands, He thought a lot of people would care more about what Pancho said, because he had been a general of the revolution and he cared about his people and knew what was best for the people of Mexico. He was a hero to a lot of people, but was also a rebel to others. To Obregon, he was just a threat to him since a lot of people were on Villa’s side. He shouldn’t had never joined the politics. But he joined because he wanted the best for his people.
On the contrary these, are my reasons on why I thought his assassination was justified. He was threat to Obregon. Villa was also a general and a hero in the Revolution. He joined the politics because he wanted his people to be in good hands. Villa knew he couldn’t trust Obregon. Villa went through a lot growing up. He would steal from the rich to give to the poor, but he would also steal from the
Due to the fact, Obregon got mad because Villa broke the agreement they had about him retiring and not joining the Mexican politics. Addition to that Villa did everything for his people. His people loved him. They reason why Villa broke the agreement was …show more content…
Obregon knew that people follow and support Villa. Villa was like a hero to his people. Not only, but also Obregon knew that Villa had a lot of supporters on his side and is why he told him to not get involved in the election, because he knew a lot of people would have followed him and vote for him. Pancho did not listen to Obregon because he knew that he couldn’t be trusted. With the result of that he got involved. That is what got Obregon mad and was probably the reason why he ordered the assassination.
In other hands, He thought a lot of people would care more about what Pancho said, because he had been a general of the revolution and he cared about his people and knew what was best for the people of Mexico. He was a hero to a lot of people, but was also a rebel to others. To Obregon, he was just a threat to him since a lot of people were on Villa’s side. He shouldn’t had never joined the politics. But he joined because he wanted the best for his people.
On the contrary these, are my reasons on why I thought his assassination was justified. He was threat to Obregon. Villa was also a general and a hero in the Revolution. He joined the politics because he wanted his people to be in good hands. Villa knew he couldn’t trust Obregon. Villa went through a lot growing up. He would steal from the rich to give to the poor, but he would also steal from the