Bigfoot is one of the creatures that most captivated humans because it's was frequently seen but never captured, some scientists question its existence but many people claim that they have evidence and more that ten thousand sightings in the past two hundred years.
British Columbia has few of the most talked and discussed sightings because two of them occurred on the same night,about three hours apart. Two drivers allege that they saw Bigfoot on the same road only one mile distant. In my opinion, these sightings are false because a human being's average walking speed is about three miles per hour so this means three hours later while factoring in that you get tired you should have walked about six to seven miles, Bigfoot is between seven and …show more content…
Scientist tried to communicate with Bigfoot in the dark by tapping on a tree twice if Bigfoot was there then they would hear two taps coming back, but this doesn't prove that it was Bigfoot because chimps are known to do this type of behavior for communication.
One of the most controversial evidence of Bigfoot's existence is the Patterson film, which personally at first looks a bit true but upon further inspection, it looks fake because the figure of the body looks a lot like a man in a monkey suit, especially the fact that sole of the foot looks white just like most mascot costumes while gorillas’ sole is black. Also, Roger Patterson was shooting a movie about Bigfoot, so this footage was probably some sort of promotion for his movie or a way to make money.
To sum up, I believe that Bigfoot is nothing but a hoax because there is no legit evidence or a decent footage that you can identify what's in it, most footage has a very bad quality or a very shaky camera. In addition, the theory of evolution completely rejects the existence of
British Columbia has few of the most talked and discussed sightings because two of them occurred on the same night,about three hours apart. Two drivers allege that they saw Bigfoot on the same road only one mile distant. In my opinion, these sightings are false because a human being's average walking speed is about three miles per hour so this means three hours later while factoring in that you get tired you should have walked about six to seven miles, Bigfoot is between seven and …show more content…
Scientist tried to communicate with Bigfoot in the dark by tapping on a tree twice if Bigfoot was there then they would hear two taps coming back, but this doesn't prove that it was Bigfoot because chimps are known to do this type of behavior for communication.
One of the most controversial evidence of Bigfoot's existence is the Patterson film, which personally at first looks a bit true but upon further inspection, it looks fake because the figure of the body looks a lot like a man in a monkey suit, especially the fact that sole of the foot looks white just like most mascot costumes while gorillas’ sole is black. Also, Roger Patterson was shooting a movie about Bigfoot, so this footage was probably some sort of promotion for his movie or a way to make money.
To sum up, I believe that Bigfoot is nothing but a hoax because there is no legit evidence or a decent footage that you can identify what's in it, most footage has a very bad quality or a very shaky camera. In addition, the theory of evolution completely rejects the existence of